To determine their relative effects, the preferences of 19 deprived and 21 non-deprived preschoolers for both complex stimuli and novel stimuli was measured. The deprived children showed a lack of preference for the novel stimuli but did not differ from the non-deprived group in their preference for complexity. These data clarified a confounding of these stimulus dimensions which had occurred in previous studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerlyneD. E.Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.
2.
BerlyneD. E.Arousal and reinforcement. In LevineD. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1967. Lincoln: Univer. of Nebraska Press, 1967. Pp. 1–110.
3.
BerlyneD. E.Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.
4.
BerlyneD. E.The new experimental aesthetics. In BerlyneD. E. (Ed.), Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. New York: Wiley, 1974. Pp. 1–25.
5.
BronsonG. W.The fear of novelty. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 350–358.
6.
ButlerJ. M.RiceL. N.Adience, self-actualization and drive. In WepmanJ. M.HeineR. W. (Eds.), Concepts of personality. Chicago: Aldine, 1963. Pp. 79–110.
7.
HicksR. A.DockstaderS.Cultural deprivation and preschool children's preferences for complex and novel stimuli. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968, 27, 1321–1322.
8.
HicksR. A.DockstaderS.Parker-SchumacherM.Cultural deprivation and response biases of preschool children for complex and novel stimuli. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1975, 40, 999–1003.
9.
HicksR. A.PackwoodJ.Effects of structural complexity of bigrams on paired-associate learning and retention of children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971, 62, 290–292.
10.
MarshallH. H.Learning as a function of task interest, reinforcement, and social class variables. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1969, 20, 133–137.
