Eye dominance tests (24 comparisons) varied markedly in agreement with each other for 225 consecutive screening evaluations (5 yr. to 55 yr.) in a reading clinic.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BernerG. E.BernerD. E.Relation of ocular dominance, handedness, and the controlling eye in binocular vision. AMA Archives of Ophthalmology, 1953, 50, 603–608.
2.
DelacatoC. H.The treatment and prevention of reading problems. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas, 1959.
3.
DelacatoC. H.The diagnosis and treatment of speech and reading problems. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas, 1963.
4.
FreedC.Can sighting tests be linked to the clumsiness syndrome?Optical Journal and Review of Optometry, 1973, 110, 23–29.
5.
HarrisA. J.Lateral dominance, directional confusion, and reading disability. Journal of Psychology, 1957, 44, 283–294.
6.
HarrisA. J.Harris Tests of Lateral Dominance: manual of directions for administration and interpretation. (3rd ed.) New York: Psychological Corp., 1958.
7.
LeWinnE. B.DomanG.DomanR. J.DelacatoC. H.SpitzE. B.ThomasE. W.Neurological organization: the basis for learning. In HelmuthJ. (Ed.), Learning disorders. Vol. 2. Seattle: Special Child Publications, 1966. Pp. 47–93.
8.
McNemarQ.Psychological statistics. (4th ed.) New York: Wiley, 1969. Pp. 54–58.
9.
OrtonS. T.Reading, writing, and speech problems in children. New York: Norton, 1937.
10.
PalmerL. L.A comparison of a visual dissociation test on the Keystone Telebinocular with other tests of dominance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, North Texas State Univer., 1974. (a)
