ZmudzinskaMCzarnecka-OperaczMSilnyWKramerL.Contact allergy in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers—possible role of chronic venous insufficiency. Contact Dermatitis2006;54:100–5.
2.
MachetLCouhéCPerrinaudA. A high prevalence of sensitization still persists in leg ulcer patients: A retrospective series of 106 patients tested between 2001 and 2002 and a meta-analysis of 1975–2003 data. Br J Dermatol2004;150:929–35.
3.
TavadiaSBianchiRDaweRS. Allergic contact dermatitis in venous leg ulcer patients. Contact Dermatitis2003;48:261–5.
4.
JankicevicJVesicSVukicevicJ. Contact sensitivity in patients with venous leg ulcers in Serbia: Comparison with contact dermatitis patients to ulcer patients. Contact Dermatitis2008;38:32–6.
5.
ParamsothyYCollinsMSmithAG. Contact dermatitis in patients with leg ulcers. Contact Dermatitis1988;18:30–6.
6.
SaapLFahimSArsenaultE. Contact sensitivity in patients with leg ulcerations, a North American study. Arch Dermatol2004;140:1241–6.
7.
MarasovicDVuksicI. Allergic contact dermatitis in patients with leg ulcers. Contact Dermatitis1999;41:107–9.
8.
EedyDJ. Mupirocin allergy in the setting of venous ulceration. Contact Dermatitis1995;32:240.
9.
OsmundsenPE. Contact dermatitis to chlorhexidine. Contact Dermatitis1982;8:81–3.
10.
WolfR. The lanolin paradox. Dermatology1996;192:198–202.
11.
MallonEPowellSM. Sorbitan sesquioleate—a potential allergen in leg ulcer patients. Contact Dermatitis1994;30:180–1.
12.
Pasche-KooFPilettaPAHunzikerN. High sensitization rate to emulsifiers in patients with chronic leg ulcers. Contact Dermatitis1994;31:226–8.
13.
de Waard-van der SpekFBDevillersACAOranjeAP. Allergic contact dermatitis to sorbitan sesquioleate in adaptic wound dressing. Contact Dermatitis2007;57:54–6.
14.
DissanayakeMPowellSM. Allergic contact dermatitis from BHT in leg ulcer patients. Contact Dermatitis1989;21:195.
15.
PereiraTFlourMGoossensA. Allergic contact dermatitis from modified colophonium in wound dressings. Contact Dermatitis2007;56:5–9.
16.
MallonEPowellSM. Allergic contact dermatitis from Granuflex hydrocolloid dressings. Contact Dermatitis1994;30:110–1.
17.
SalimAShawS. Recommendation to include ester gum resin when patch testing patients with leg ulcers. Contact Dermatitis2001;44:34–60.
18.
Timmer-de MikLToonstraJ. Allergy to hydrocolloid dressing. Contact Dermatitis2008;58:124–5.
19.
SassevilleDTennstedtDLachapelleJM. Allergic contact dermatitis from hydrocolloid dressings. Am J Contact Dermatitis1997;8:236–8.
20.
ParslewREvansSKingCM. Allergic contact dermatitis from polyisobutylene in stoma bags. Contact Dermatitis1996;35:178–9.
21.
HellandSNyforsAUtneL. Contact dermatitis to Synthaderm®. Contact Dermatitis1983;9:504–6.
22.
WilsonCLCameronJPowellSM. High incidence of contact dermatitis in leg ulcer patients. Clin Exp Dermatol1991;16:250–3.
23.
KulozikMPowellSMCherryG. Contact sensitivity in community-based leg ulcer patients. Clin Exp Dermatol1988;13:82–4.
24.
GooptuCPowellSM. The problems of rubber hypersensitivity (types I and IV) in chronic leg ulcer and stasis eczema patients. Contact Dermatitis1999;41:89–93.
25.
PerrenaudDRameletAA. Chronic leg ulcers and eczema. Curr Probl Dermatol1999;27:165–9.
26.
GallenkemperGRabeEBauerR. Contact sensitization in chronic venous insufficiency: Modern wound dressings. Contact Dermatitis1998;38:274–8.
27.
AngeliniGRantuccioFMeneghiniCL. Contact dermatitis in patients with leg ulcers. Contact Dermatitis1975;1:81–7.
28.
MaltenKE. Sensitizers in leg bandages. Contact Dermatitis1977;3:217–8.
29.
LimK-STangMGoonA. Contact sensitization in patients with chronic venous ulcers in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis2007;56:94–8.
30.
SchechterJFWilkinsonRDDel CarpioJ. Anaphylaxis following the use of bacitracin ointment. Report of a case and review of the literature. Arch Dermatol1984;120:909.
31.
SoodATaylorJS. Bacitracin: Allergen of the year. Am J Contact Dermatitis2003;14:3–4.
32.
EboDGBridtsCHStevensWJ. IgE-mediated anaphylaxis from chlorhexidine: Diagnostic possibilities. Contact Dermatitis2006;55:301–2.
33.
JonssonMFiskerstrandEJ. Contact urticaria syndrome due to carboxymethylcellulose in hydrocolloid dressing. Contact Dermatitis1999;41:344–5.
