Rapid access to the results of high quality research studies for real time use during clinical care is the aim of evidence-based medicine.
Methods:
The current volume and methods of disseminating research findings are barriers to this goal. Electronic publishing, CD-ROMs for personal computers, and Internet-based databases and searching are tools helping to overcome these barriers.
Results:
Several examples in the United Kingdom and United States employing these tools are described.
Conclusions:
Technology is making traditional narrative reviews such as printed textbooks obsolete for the practice of evidence-based medicine.
SmithR. What clinical information do doctors need?British Medical Journal1996;313:1062–1068.
2.
MulrowCD. Rationale for systematic reviews. British Medical Journal1994;309: 597–599.
3.
GeddesJRWilczynskiNReynoldsSSzatmariPStreinerDL. Evidence-based mental health—The first year. Evidence-Based Mental Health1999;2:3–5.
4.
AntmanEMLauJKupelnickBMostellerFChalmersTC. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Medical Association1992;268:240–248.
5.
CochraneAL. 1931–1971: A critical review, with particular reference to the medical profession. In Medicines for the year 2000. London: Office of Health Economics, 1979;1–11.
Anonymous. Schizophrenia and the Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Collaboration Schizophrenia Review Group. Schizophrenia Research1994;13:185–187.
8.
The Cochrane Collaboration. The Cochrane Library. Oxford: Update Software, 1996.
9.
HaynesRBWilczynskiNMcKibbonKAWalkerCJSinclairJC. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association1994;1:447–458.
