Information and communications technology (ICT) has impacted almost all human service disciplines and currently is evolving in social work. This study provides a systematic review of ICT-enhanced social work interventions, with particular reference to their intervention fidelity (IF), validity, and the role of ICT in the helping relationship process.
Method:
We assessed specific articles published in journals classified under the “Social Work” research area in the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI; N = 17).
Results:
All studies that met specific criteria indicated positive intervention outcomes, most of them were of “good” or “fair” quality in terms of their validity, and almost all of them upheld IF. However, there was room for improvement in the conceptualization component of the ICT intervention application.
Conclusions:
These ICT-enhanced intervention studies established a foundation to enable unique practice insights to advance social work practice knowledge. Additional practice and research in this area are necessary in order to further our understanding about ICT and their use in social work interventions. Implications are discussed and suggestions are provided.
Australian Association of Social Worker. (2013a). Ethics and practice guideline—Social media, information and communication technologies: Part 1. Melbourne: Author.
2.
Australian Association of Social Worker. (2013b). Ethics and practice guideline—Social media, information and communication technologies: Part 2. Melbourne: Author.
3.
BarreraM.GlasgowR. E.McKayH. G.BolesS. M.FeilE. G. (2002). Do Internet-based support interventions change perceptions of social support? An experimental trial of approaches for supporting diabetes self-management. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 637–654. doi:10.1023/a:1016369114780
4.
BellgA. J.BorrelliB.ResnickB.HechtJ.MinicucciD. S.OryM.CzajkowskiS. (2004). Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychology, 23, 443–451. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443
5.
BestP.ManktelowR.TaylorB. (2014). Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: A systematic narrative review. Children and Youth Services Review, 41, 27–36. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.001
6.
BigelowK. M.CartaJ. J.LefeverJ. B. (2008). Txt u ltr using cellular phone technology to enhance a parenting intervention for families at risk for neglect. Child Maltreatment, 13, 362–367. doi:10.1177/1077559508320060
7.
BordnickP. S.TraylorA. C.CarterB. L.GraapK. M. (2012). A feasibility study of virtual reality-based coping skills training for nicotine dependence. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 293–300. doi:10.1177/1049731511426880
8.
British Association of Social Workers. (2013). BASW social media policy. Birmingham, England: Author.
9.
CalamR.SandersM. R.MillerC.SadhnaniV.CarmontS. A. (2008). Can technology and the media help reduce dysfunctional parenting and increase engagement with preventative parenting interventions?Child Maltreatment, 13, 347–361. doi:10.1177/1077559508321272
10.
Chadegani ArezooA.SalehiH.Md YunusmM.FarhadiH.FooladiM.FarhadiM.Ale EbrahimN. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of science and Scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9, 18–26.
11.
ChesterA.GlassC. A. (2006). Online counselling: A descriptive analysis of therapy services on the Internet. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 34, 145–160. doi:10.1080/03069880600583170
12.
ChiC. W.FrydenbergE. (2009). Coping in the cyberworld: Program implementation and evaluation—A pilot project. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 19, 196–215. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.19.2.196
13.
ChoiY. J.AnS. (2015). Interventions to improve responses of helping professionals to intimate partner violence: A systematic review. Research on Social Work Practice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1049731515579420
14.
ConnV. S. (2012). Unpacking the Black Box: Countering the problem of inadequate intervention descriptions in research reports. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 34, 427–433. doi:10.1177/0193945911434627
15.
Council on Social Work Education. (2008). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Alexandria, VA: Author.
16.
DarleneR.-E. (2008). SSCI, ISI, JCR, JIF, IF, and journal quality. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 19, 185–189. doi:10.1002/hrdq.1235
17.
DelaneyR.NelsonC.PacificiC.WhiteL.SmalleyB. K. (2012). Web-enhanced preservice training for prospective resource parents: A randomized trial of effectiveness and user satisfaction. Journal of Social Service Research, 38, 503–514. doi:10.1080/01488376.2012.696416
18.
DunlopJ. M.HoloskoM. J. (2007). Information technology and evidence-based social work practice. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
19.
FeilE. G.BaggettK. M.DavisB.SheeberL.LandryS.CartaJ. J.BuzhardtJ. (2008). Expanding the reach of preventive interventions development of an internet-based training for parents of infants. Child Maltreatment, 13, 334–346. doi:10.1177/1077559508322446
20.
FinnJ.KermanB.LeCornecJ. (2004). Building skills-building futures: Providing information technology to foster families. Families in Society-The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 85, 165–176.
21.
FinnJ.KermanB.LeCornecJ. (2005). Reducing the digital divide for children in foster care: First-year evaluation of the building skills-building futures program. Research on Social Work Practice, 15, 470–480. doi:10.1177/1049731505278026
22.
FraserM. W.GalinskyM. J. (2010). Steps in intervention research: Designing and developing social programs. Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 459–466. doi:10.1177/1049731509358424
23.
FuJ. S. (2013). ICT in education: A critical literature review and its Implications. International Journal of Education & Development Using Information & Communication Technology, 9, 112–125.
24.
GelattV. A.Adler-BaederF.SeeleyJ. R. (2010). An interactive web-based program for stepfamilies: Development and evaluation of efficacy. Family Relations, 59, 572–586. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00624.x
25.
GiffordsE. D. (2009). The Internet and social work: The next generation. Families in Society-The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 90, 413–418. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.3920
26.
HalfordS.ObstfelderA.LotheringtonA. T. (2009). Beyond implementation and resistance: How the delivery of ICT policy is reshaping healthcare. Policy & Politics, 37, 113–128.
27.
HarrisR. P.HelfandM.WoolfS. H.LohrK. N.MulrowC. D.TeutschS. M.AtkinsD. (2001). Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: A review of the process. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20, 21–35.
28.
HillA.ShawI. G. R. (2011). Social work & ICT. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
HogueA.LiddleH. A.RoweC. (1996). Treatment adherence process research in family therapy: A rationale and some practical guidelines. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 33, 332.
30.
HoldenG.BearisonD. J.RodeD. C.RosenbergG.FishmanM. (1999). Evaluating the effects of a virtual environment (STARBRIGHT World) with hospitalized children. Research on Social Work Practice, 9, 365–382.
31.
HoloskoM. J. (2010). What types of designs are we using in social work research and evaluation?Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 665–673.
32.
KaganoffE.BordnickP. S.CarterB. L. (2012). Feasibility of using virtual reality to assess nicotine cue reactivity during treatment. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 159–165. doi:10.1177/1049731511428617
33.
LanfrancoS. (2008). Information and communication technology (ICT): In the service of human services. Currents: Scholarship in the Human Services, 7, 1–18.
34.
LiebermanM. A.WinzelbergA.GolantM.WakahiroM.DiMinnoM.AminoffM.ChristineC. (2005). Online support groups for Parkinson’s patients: A pilot study of effectiveness. Social Work in Health Care, 42, 23–38. doi:10.1300/J010v42n02_02
35.
MarkauskaiteL. (2003). Critical review of research findings on information technology in education. Informatics in Education—An International Journal, 2, 65–78.
36.
MileyK. K.O’MeliaM.DuBoisB. (2009). Generalist social work practice: An empowering approach. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
37.
MishnaF.BogoM.RootJ.SawyerJ. L.Khoury-KassabriM. (2012). “It just crept in”: The digital age and implications for social work practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 40, 277–286. doi:10.1007/s10615-012-0383-4
38.
MishnaF.CookC.SainiM.WuM. J.MacFaddenR. (2011). Interventions to prevent and reduce cyber abuse of youth: A systematic review. Research on Social Work Practice, 21, 5–14. doi:10.1177/1049731509351988
39.
MoherD.CookD. J.EastwoodS.OlkinI.RennieD.StroupD. F., & QUOROM Group. (1999). Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. The Lancet, 354, 1896–1900.
40.
MoncherF. J.PrinzR. J. (1991). Treatment fidelity in outcome studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 247–266.
41.
MowbrayO.QuinnA. (2015). A systematic review of treatment services among older adults with substance use problems. Research on Social Work Practice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1049731515579075
42.
National Association of Social Workers & Association of Social Work Boards. (2005). Standards for technology and social work practice. Washington, DC: Author.
43.
NicholasD. B.ChahauverA.BrownstoneD.HetheringtonR.McNeillT. (2012). Evaluation of an online peer support network for fathers of a child with a brain tumor. Social Work in Health Care, 51, 232–245. doi:10.1080/00981389.2011.631696
44.
NicholasD. B.FellnerK. D.FrankM.SmallM.HetheringtonR.SlaterR.DanemanD. (2012). Evaluation of an online education and support intervention for adolescents with diabetes. Social Work in Health Care, 51, 815–827. doi:10.1080/00981389.2012.699507
45.
NieuwboerC. C.FukkinkR. G.HermannsJ. M. A. (2013). Online programs as tools to improve parenting: A meta-analytic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 1823–1829. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.08.008
46.
PacificiC.WhiteL.CummingsK.NelsonC. (2005). Vstreet.com: A web-based community for at-risk teens. Child Welfare, 84, 25–46.
47.
ParrottL.Madoc-JonesI. (2008). Reclaiming information and communication technologies for empowering social work practice. Journal of Social Work, 8, 181–197. doi:10.1177/1468017307084739
48.
PoonE. G.JhaA. K.ChristinoM.HonourM. M.FernandopulleR.MiddletonB.BlumenthalD. (2006). Assessing the level of healthcare information technology adoption in the United States: A snapshot. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 6, 1–9.
49.
ReamerF. G. (2013). Social work in a digital age: Ethical and risk management challenges. Social Work, 58, 163–172. doi:10.1093/sw/swt003
50.
RichardsD.ViganoN. (2013). Online counseling: A narrative and critical review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69, 994–1011. doi:10.1002/jclp.21974
51.
RosenA.ProctorE. K.StaudtM. M. (1999). Social work research and the quest for effective practice. Social Work Research, 23, 4–14.
52.
RothmanJ.ThomasE. J. (1994). Intervention research: design and development for the human service. New York, NY: Routledge.
53.
Social Welfare Department. (2011). Invitation to operate pilot cyber youth outreaching projects service specifications. Hong Kong, China: Author.
54.
SoutterJ.HamiltonN.RussellP.RussellC.BushbyK.SloperP.BartlettK. (2004). The Golden Freeway: A preliminary evaluation of a pilot study advancing information technology as a social intervention for boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and their families. Health & Social Care in the Community, 12, 25–33. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00465.x
55.
TaylorS.MulroyE. A.AustinM. J. (2004). Social work textbooks on human behavior and the social environment: an analysis of the social environment component. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 10, 85–110. doi:10.1300/J137v10n03_04
56.
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2008). Subject benchmark statement: Social work. London, England: Author.
57.
ThyerB. A. (2001). What is the role of theory in research on social work practice?Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 9–25. doi:10.2307/23043845
58.
ThyerB. A. (2008). The potentially harmful effects of theory in social work. In ThyerB. A.SowersK. M.DulmusC. N. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of social work and social welfare, Volume 2: Human behavior in the social environment (pp. 519–541). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
59.
TuckerA. R.BlytheB. (2008). Attention to treatment fidelity in social work outcomes: A review of the literature from the 1990s. Social Work Research, 32, 185–190.
60.
WatlingS.RogersJ. (2012). Social work in a digital society. London, England: Sage.
61.
WestD.HeathD. (2011). Theoretical pathways to the future: Globalization, ICT and social work theory and practice. Journal of Social Work, 11, 209–221. doi:10.1177/1468017310386835
62.
WodarskiJ. S. (2011). The social work practice research conundrum. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 21, 577–600. doi:10.1080/10911359.2011.580249
63.
ZilbersteinK. (2013). Technology, relationships and culture: Clinical and theoretical implications. Clinical Social Work Journal, 1–8. doi:10.1007/s10615-013-0461-2
