Aside from the literature on inter-racial and cross-sex relationships, few studies have examined the determinants of relationships that cross social boundaries. The authors contribute to this literature by considering the social boundary between the religious and the non-religious. Surveys of U.S. adults provide evidence of popular aversion toward the non-religious, but this analysis of the Baylor Religion Survey (2005) shows that the majority of religious Americans report a friendship with someone who is not religious at all. The authors find that such boundary-crossing relationships are largely structured by homophily, opportunities for intergroup contact, and religious barriers to intergroup contact. These findings reveal that some religiously themed conflicts that are common among cultural elites may not be particularly salient in the realm of daily social life.
AllisonPaul D.2001. Missing Data, Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 7–136. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
AllportGordon. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
ArgyleMichaelBeit-HallahmiBenjamin. 1975. The Social Psychology of Religion. London: Routledge.
4.
PressAssociated. 2011. “Alabama: Governor Apologizes for Excluding Non-Christians.”New York Times, January 20, A19.
5.
BaderChristopher D.MenckenCarson F.FroesePaul. 2007. “American Piety 2005: Content and Methods of the Baylor Religion Survey.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion46(4):447–63.
6.
BakerJoseph O.SmithBuster G., 2009. “The Nones: Social Characteristics of the Religiously Unaffliated.”Social Forces87(3):1251–64.
7.
BainbridgeWilliam Sims. 2005. “Atheism.”Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion1(2):1–24.
8.
BergJustin A.2009. “White Public Opinion toward Undocumented Immigrants: Threat and Interpersonal Environment.”Sociological Perspectives52(1):39–58.
9.
BlauPeter M.1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
10.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardo. 2006. Racism without Racists. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefeld.
11.
CragunRyanKosminBarryKeysarArielaHammerJoseph H.NielsenMichael. Forthcoming. “On the Receiving End: Discrimination Toward the Non-Religious.”Journal of Contemporary Religion.
12.
CollettJessica L.LizardoOmar. 2009. “A Power-Control Theory of Gender and Religiosity.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion48(1):213–31.
13.
CragunRyan T.2009. “On the Receiving End: Discrimination against the Non-Religious.” Paper presented at the Inaugural Meeting of the Non-Religion and Secularism Research Network, Oxford, UK.
14.
DipreteThomas A.GelmanAndrewTeitlerJulienZhengTianMcCormickTyler. 2011. “Segregation in Social Networks Based on Acquaintanceship and Trust.”American Journal of Sociology116(4):1234–83.
15.
DoughertyKevinJohnsonByron R.PolsonEdward C., 2007. “Recovering the Lost: Remeasuring U.S. Religious Affliation.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion46(4):483–99.
EdgellPennyGerteisJosephHartmannDouglas. 2006. “Atheists as ‘Other’: Moral Boundaries and Cultural Membership in American Society.”American Sociological Review71(2):211–34.
18.
EmersonMichael O.KimbroRachel TolbertYanceyGeorge. 2002. “Contact Theory Extended: The Effects of Prior Racial Contact on Current Social Ties.”Social Science Quarterly83(3):745–61.
19.
FeldScott. 1981. “The Focused Organization of Social Ties.”The American Journal of Sociology86(5):1015–35.
20.
FeldScott. 1982. “Social Structural Determinants of Similarity among Associates.”American Sociological Review47(6):791–801.
21.
GrannovetterMark. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.”American Journal of Sociology78(6):1360–80.
22.
GrannovetterMark. 1983. “The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited.”Sociological Theory1(1):201–33.
23.
HammerJoseph. 2009. “The Nature and Sequelae of Religious Discrimination as Experienced by Atheists.” Paper at the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.
24.
HayesBernadette C.2000. “Religious Independents within Western Industrialized Nations: A Socio-Demographic Profile.”Sociology of Religion61(2):191–207.
25.
HewstoneMilesBrownRupert. 1986. “Contact Is Not Enough: An Intergroup Perspective on the ‘Contact Hypothesis’.” Pp. 1–44 in Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounter, edited by HewstoneM.BrownR., Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
26.
HortonNicholas J.LipsitzStuart R.ParzenMichael. 2003. “A Potential for Bias when Rounding in Multiple Imputation.”The American Statistician57(4):229–32.
27.
HoutMichaelFischerClaude S., 2002. “Why More Americans Have No Religious Preference: Politics and Generations.”American Sociological Review67(2):165–90.
28.
HunterJames D.1992. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.
29.
JackmanMary R.CraneMarie. 1986. “Some of My Best Friends Are Black…: Interracial Friendship and Whites' Racial Attitudes.”The Public Opinion Quarterly50(4):459–86.
30.
KeysarAriela. 2007. “Who Are America's Atheists and Agnostics?” Pp. 33–39 in Secularism and Secularity: Contemporary International Perspectives, edited by KosminB.KeysarA., Hartford, CT: Institute for the Study of Secularism in Society and Culture.
31.
KalmijnMatthius. 1991. “Shifting Boundaries: Trends in Religious and Educational Homogamy.”American Sociological Review56(6):786–800.
32.
KundaZiva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.”Psychological Bulletin108(3):480–98.
33.
LazarsfeldPaul F.MertonRobert K., 1954. “Friendship as a Social Process: A Substantive and Methodological Analysis.” Pp. 18–66 in Freedom and Control in Modern Society, edited by BergerM., New York: Van Nostrand.
34.
LinNan. 1999. “Social Networks and Status Attainment.”Annual Review of Sociology25: 467–87.
35.
MarsdenPeter V.1987. “Core Discussion Networks of Americans.”American Sociological Review52(1):122–31.
36.
MarsdenPeter V.1988. “Homogeneity in Confiding Relations.”Social Networks10(1):57–76.
37.
McPhersonMiller J.Smith-LovinLynn. 1987. “Homophily in Voluntary Organizations: Status Distance and the Composition of Face-to-Face Groups.”American Sociological Review52(3):370–79.
38.
MillerAlan S.StarkRodney. 2002. “Gender and Religiousness: Can Socialization Explanations Be Saved?”American Journal of Sociology107(6):1399–423.
39.
NyhanBrendanReiflerJason. 2010. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.”Political Behavior32(2):303–30.
40.
OlsonDaniel V. A.CarrollJackson W., 1992. “Religiously Based Politics: Religious Elites and the Public.”Social Forces70(3):765–86.
41.
PettigrewThomas F.TroppLinda R., 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90(5):751–83.
PodolnyJoel M.BaronJames N., 1997. “Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace.”American Sociological Review62(5):673–93.
44.
PorterJeremyBrownSusannah M., 2008. “On the Diversity of Friendship and Network Ties: A Comparison of Religious versus Nonreligious Group Membership in the Rural American South.”Southern Rural Sociology23(1):277–97.
45.
PutnamRobert D.2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
46.
ScheitleChristopher P.AdamczykAmy. 2009. “It Takes Two: The Interplay of Individual and Group Theology on Social Embeddedness.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion48(1):16–29.
47.
SherkatDarren. 2010. “Religion and Verbal Ability.”Social Science Research39(1):2–13.
48.
SelfhoutMaartenDeniseenJaapBranjeSusanMeeusWim. 2009. “In the Eye of the Beholder: Perceived, Actual, and Peer-Rated Similarity in Personality, Communication, and Friendship Intensity During the Acquaintanceship Process.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96(6):1152–65.
49.
SteenslandBrianParkJerry Z.RegnerusMark D.RobinsonLynn D.WilcoxBradford W.WoodberryRobert D., 2000. “The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art.”Social Forces79(1):291–318.
50.
StolzenbergRoss M.Blair-LoyMaryWaiteLinda J., 1995. “Religious Participation in Early Adulthood: Age and Family Life Cycle Effects on Church Membership.”American Sociological Review60(1):84–103.
51.
SuitorJ. JillKeetonShirley. 1997. “Once a Friend, Always a Friend? Effects of Homophily on Women's Support Networks across a Decade.”Social Networks19(1):51–62.
52.
SuitorJ. JillPillemerKarlKeetonShirley. 1995. “When Experience Counts: The Effects of Experiential and Structural Similarity on Patterns of Support and Interpersonal Stress.”Social Forces73(4):1573–88.
53.
ThoitsPeggy A.1992. “Identity Structures and Psychological Well-Being: Gender and Marital Status Comparisons.”Social Psychology Quarterly55(3):236–56.
54.
UenoKoji. 2010. “Patterns of Cross-Orientation Friendships in High Schools.”Social Science Research39(3):444–58.
55.
UslanerEric. 2002. “Religion and Civic Engagement in Canada and the United States.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion41(2):239–54.
56.
UslanerEric. 2008. “Trust as a Moral Value.” Pp. 101–21 in The Handbook of Social Capital, edited by CastiglioneD.van DethJ.W.WollebG., Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
57.
VerbruggeLois M.1977. “The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices.”Social Forces56(2):576–97.
58.
von HippelPaul T.2007. “Regression with Missing Ys: An Improved Strategy for Analyzing Multiply Imputed Data.”Sociological Methodology37(1):83–117.
59.
WrightErik O.ChoDonmoon. 1992. “The Relative Permeability of Class Boundaries to Cross-Class Friendships: A Comparative Study of the United States, Canada, Sweden, and Norway.”American Sociological Review57(1):85–102.
60.
WuthnowRobert. 2003. “Overcoming Status Distinction? Religious Involvement, Social Class, Race, and Ethnicity in Friendship Patterns.”Sociology of Religion64(4):423–42.
