This article explores residential patterns across generations of new immigrant groups. The discussion is situated in a multi-ethnic context. The analysis is based on data from the 2001 Canadian census and focuses on three visible minority groups in the four largest metropolitan areas of Canada. In line with the spatial assimilation perspective, the authors found that visible minority groups reside in neighborhoods where, over generations, as the proportion of whites increases, the proportions of their own group and other minority groups decline. The findings also show support that socioeconomic resources are positively related to residential integration and that each successive generation is more efficient than the previous generation in translating socioeconomic resources. However, echoing the place stratification perspective, variations in the effect of socioeconomic resources within each group and generation have been documented. Taken together, the results suggest that the factors contributing to residential integration are more complicated in a multi-ethnic context.
AlbaRichard D.LoganJohn R., 1991. “Variations on Two Themes: Racial and Ethnic Patterns in the Attainment of Suburban Residence”. Demography28: 431–53.
2.
AlbaRichard D.LoganJohn R., 1993. “Minority Proximity to Whites in Suburbs: An Individual-Level Analysis of Segregation”. American Journal of Sociology98: 1388–427.
3.
AlbaRichard D.LoganJohn R.CrowderKyle. 1997. “White Neighborhoods and Assimilation: The Greater New York Region, 1980–1990”. Social Forces75: 883–909.
4.
AlbaRichard D.NeeVictor. 2003. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BoydMonicaGriecoElizabeth M., 1998. “Triumphant Transitions: Socioeconomic Achievements of the Second Generation”. International Migration Review32: 853–76.
6.
Chase-LansdaleP. LindsayGordonRachel A.Brooks-GunnJeanneKlebanovPamela K., 1997. “Neighborhood and Family Influences on the Intellectual and Behavioral Competence of Preschool and Early School-Age Children”. Pp. 119–45 in Neighborhood Poverty: Context and Consequences for Children, Volume I, edited by Brooks-GunnJ.DuncanG. J.AberJ. L., New York: Russell Sage Press.
7.
ClarkWilliam A. V.1998. The California Cauldron: Immigration and the Fortunes of Local Communities. New York: Guilford Press.
8.
ClarkWilliam A. V.LedwithValerie. 2007. “How Much Does Income Matter in Neighborhood Choice?”Population Research and Policy Review26(2): 145–61.
9.
FarleyReynoldsAlbaRichard. 2002. “The New Second Generation in the United States”. International Migration Review36: 669–701.
10.
FongEric. 1996. “A Comparative Perspective of Racial Residential Segregation: American and Canadian Experiences”. Sociological Quarterly37: 501–28.
11.
FongEricGuliaMilena. 1999. “Differences in Neighborhood Qualities among Major Racial/Ethnic Groups in Canada”. Sociological Inquiry69(4)575–98.
12.
FongEricShibuyaKumiko. 2005. “Multiethnic Cities in North America”. Annual Review of Sociology31: 285–304.
13.
FongEricWilkesRima. 1999. “An Examination of Spatial Assimilation Model”. International Migration Review33: 594–620.
14.
GansHerbert J.1979. “Symbolic Ethnicity: The Future of Ethnic Groups and Culture in America”. Ethnic and Racial Studies2: 1–19.
15.
HenryFrances. 1994. Caribbean Diaspora in Toronto. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
16.
IcelandJohn. 2004. “Beyond Black and White: Residential Segregation in Multiethnic America”. Social Science Research33(2)(June): 248–71.
17.
IcelandJohnScopillitiMelissa. 2008. “Immigrant Residential Segregation in U.S. Metropolitan Areas, 1990–2000”. Demography45: 79–94.
18.
KimDae Young. 2004. “Leaving the Ethnic Economy: The Rapid Integration of Second-Generation Korean Americans in New York”. Pp. 257–80 in Becoming New Yorkers: Ethnographies of the New Second Generation, edited by KasinitzP.MollenkopfJ. H.WatersM. C., New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
19.
LeeJenniferBeanFrank D., 2004. “America's Changing Color Lines: Immigration, Race/Ethnicity and Multiracial Identification”. Annual Review of Sociology30: 221–42.
20.
LoganJohnAlbaRichardLeungShu-Yin. 1996. “Minority Access to White Suburbs: A Multiregional Comparison”. Social Forces74(3): 851–82.
21.
LoganJohnAlbaRichardZhangWenquan. 2002. “Immigrant Enclaves and Ethnic Communities in New York and Los Angles”. American Sociological Review67: 299–322.
22.
MasseyDouglas S.CondranGretchen A.DentonNancy A., 1987. “The Effect of Residential Segregation on Black Social and Economic Well-Being”. Social Forces66: 29–56.
23.
MasseyDouglas S.DentonNancy A.DentonNancy A., 1985. “Spatial Assimilation as a Socioeconomic Outcome”. American Sociological Review50: 94–106.
24.
MasseyDouglas S.DentonNancy A., 1988. “Residential Segregation of Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, and Cubans by Socioeconomic Status and Generation”. Social Science Quarterly69: 797–817.
25.
MasseyDouglas S.MullanBrendan P., 1984. “Processes of Hispanic and Black Spatial Assimilation”. American Journal of Sociology89: 836–73.
26.
MorenoffJeffreySampsonRobert J., 1997. “Violent Crime and the Spatial Dynamics of Neighborhood Transition: Chicago, 1970–1990”. Social Forces76: 31–64.
27.
MylesJohnHouFeng. 2004. “Changing Colours: Spatial Assimilation and New Racial Minority Immigrants”. Canadian Journal of Sociology29: 29–58.
28.
PerlmannJoelWaldingerRoger. 1997. “Second Generation Decline? Children of Immigrants Past and Present—A Reconsideration”. International Migration Review31: 893–922.
29.
PortesAlejandroRumbautRubén G., 1996. Immigrant America: A Portrait, 2nd edition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
PortesAlejandroRumbautRubén G., 2001. Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
PortesAlejandroZhouMin. 1993. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and its Variants”. The ANNALS of the Academy of Political and Social Science530: 74–96.
32.
RosenbaumEmilyFriedmanSamantha R., 2001. “Differences in the Locational Attainment of Immigrant and Native-Born Households with Children in New York City”. Demography38: 337–48.
33.
RosenbaumEmilyFriedmanSamantha R., 2004. “Generational Patterns in Home Ownership and Housing Quality in New York City, 1999”. International Migration Review38: 1492–534.
34.
RumbautRuben G.2000. “Profiles in Resilience: Educational Achievement and Ambition among Children of Immigrants in Southern California”. Pp. 257–94 in Resilience across Contexts: Family, Work, Culture, and Community, edited by TaylorR., Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35.
ShibutaniTamotsuKwanKian M., 1965. Ethnic Stratifcation: A Comparative Approach. New York: Macmillan.
36.
SouthScott J.CrowderKyleChavezErick. 2005a. “Geographic Mobility and Spatial Assimilation among U.S. Latino Immigrants”. International Migration Review39: 577–607.
37.
SouthScott J.CrowderKyleChavezErick. 2005b. “Mgration and Spatial Assimilation among U.S. Latinos: Classical Versus Segmented Trajectories”. Demography42(3): 497–521.
38.
StevensGillian. 1992. “The Social and Demographic Context of Language Use in the United States”. American Sociological Review57: 171–85.
39.
TuanMia. 1998. Forever Foreigners or Honorary Whites? The Asian Ethnic Experience Today. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
40.
WaldingerRogerFelicianoCynthia. 2004. “Will the New Second Generation Experience ‘Downward Assimilation’? Segmented Assimilation Re-assessed”. Ethnic and Racial Studies27: 376–402.
41.
WilsonWilliam Julius. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
ZhouMin. 1997. “Segmented Assimilation: Issues, Controversies, and Research on the New Second Generation”. International Migration Review31(4): 975–1008.
