Participating in research must be an educational experience for students in order to ethically justify its inclusion as a requirement in college courses. Introductory Psychology students (N = 280) completed a written class assignment describing their research participation as a means to enhance this educational mission. Approximately half of students spontaneously mentioned something positive about the significance of the research or what they learned, with the remainder providing neutral, mixed, or negative comments. Students could articulate clearly and knowledgeably about the research in which they had participated. Such an assignment is an effective means to foster an understanding of the science of psychology.
ArnettJ. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614.
2.
BrittonB. K. (1979). Ethical and educational aspects of participating as a subject in psychology experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 6, 195–198.
3.
BrittonB. K.RichardsonD.SmithS. S., & HamiltonT. (1983). Ethical aspects of participating in psychology experiments: Effects of anonymity on evaluation, and complaints of distressed subjects. Teaching of Psychology, 10, 146–149.
4.
BrodyJ. L.GluckJ. P., & AragonA. S. (2000). Participants' understanding of the process of psychological research: Debriefing. Ethics & Behavior, 10(1), 13–25.
5.
ChiM. T. H.FeltovichP. J., & GlaserR. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152.
6.
CorenS. (1987). The psychology student subject pool: Student responses and attitudes. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 28, 360–363.
7.
DarlingJ.GoedertK.CeynarM.ShoreW., & AndersonD. (2007). Learning about the means to an end: What U.S. introductory psychology students report about experimental participation. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 6, 91–97.
8.
DaughertyT. K. (1996). Short-term effects of research participation in college men. Journal of Psychology, 130, 71–77.
9.
DavisJ. R. & FernaldP. S. (1975). Laboratory experience versus subject pool. American Psychologist, 30, 523–524.
10.
FraleyR. C. (2007). Using the Internet for personality research: What can be done, how to do it, and some concerns. In RobinsR. W.FraleyR. C., & KreugerR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 130–148). New York: Guilford.
11.
JungJ. (1969). Current practices and problems in the use of college students for psychological research. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 10, 280–290.
12.
KimbleG. A. (1987). The scientific value of undergraduate research participation. American Psychologist, 42, 267–268.
13.
LandrumR. E. & ChastainG. (1999). Subject pool policies in undergraduate-only departments: Results from a nationwide survey. In ChastainG. D. & LandrumR. E. (Eds.), Protecting human subjects: Departmental subject pools and institutional review board (pp. 25–42). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14.
LeakG. K. (1981). Student perception of coercion and value from participation in psychological research. Teaching of Psychology, 8, 147–149.
15.
LindsayR. C. & HoldenR. R. (1987). The introductory psychology subject pool in Canadian universities. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 28, 45–52.
16.
MassonM. (2009). Medical students say thanks to anatomical donors at annual service. University of Michigan Record Online, September. Retrieved November 17, 2009, from http://www.ur.umich.edu/0910/Sep21_09/18.php.
17.
MillerA. (1981). A survey of introductory psychology subject pool practices among leading universities. Teaching of Psychology, 8, 211–213.
18.
NimmerJ. G. & HandelsmanM. M. (1992). Effects of subject pool policy on student attitudes toward psychology and psychological research. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 141–144.
19.
NSABP donates sculpture to NIH to commemorate 50th anniversary. (2008). The Cancer Letter, 34, 1.
20.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.ZamboangaB. L.ThompsonR. A., & SchmersalL. A. (2005). Extra credit as incentive for voluntary research participation. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 150–153.
21.
RichardsonD. R.PegalisL., & BrittonB. (1992). A technique for enhancing the value of research participation. Contemporary Social Psychology, 16(1/2), 1–13.
22.
SearsD. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 515–530.
23.
SieberJ. E. (1999). What makes a subject pool (un)ethical? In ChastainG. D. & LandrumR. E. (Eds.), Protecting human subjects: Departmental subject pools and institutional review boards (pp. 43–64). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24.
SieberJ. E. & SaksM. J. (1989). A census of subject pool characteristics and policies. American Psychologist, 44(7), 1053–1061.
25.
SmartR. G. (1966). Subject selection bias in psychological research. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 7, 115–121.
26.
SmithS. S. & RichardsonD. (1983). Amelioration of deception and harm in psychological research: The important role of debriefing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1075–1082.
27.
WaiteB. M. & BowmanL. L. (1999). Research participation among general psychology students at a metropolitan comprehensive public university. In ChastainG. D. & LandrumR. E. (Eds.), Protecting human subjects: Departmental subject pools and institutional review boards (pp. 69–85). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28.
WintreM. G.NorthC., & SugarL. A. (2001). Psychologists' response to criticisms about research based on undergraduate participants: A developmental perspective. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 42, 216–225.
