Relationships of trust between research participants and researchers are often considered paramount to successful research; however, we know little about participants’ perspectives. We examined whom research participants trusted when taking part in research. Using a qualitative approach, we interviewed 36 research participants, including eight Indigenous participants. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. This article focuses on findings related to non-Indigenous participants. In contrast to Indigenous participants, non-Indigenous participants placed their trust in research institutions because of their systems of research ethics, their reputation and prestige. Researchers working in non-Indigenous contexts need to be cognizant that the trust that participants place in them is closely connected with the trust that participants have in the institution.
AppelbaumP.LidzC.GrissoT. (2004). Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: Frequency and risk factors. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 26(2), 1-8. doi:10.1177/1740774512456455
2.
BaierA. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96, 231-260.
3.
BuchananA. (2000). Trust in managed care organizations. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 10, 189-212.
4.
CampbellT. (2014). A clash of paradigms? Western and Indigenous views on health research involving aboriginal peoples. Nurse Researcher, 21(6), 39-43. doi:10.7748/nr.21.6.39.e1253
5.
Campos-CastilloC.WoodsonB.Theiss-MorseE.SacksT.Fleig-PalmerM.PeekM. (2016). Examining the relationship between interpersonal and institutional trust in political and health care contexts. In ShockleyE.NealT. M. S.PytlikzilligL. M.BornsteinB.H. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on trust (pp. 99-115). New York, NY: Springer.
6.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, & Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (2010). Tri-council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans.
7.
CharmazK. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
8.
DurieM. (2004). Understanding health and illness: Research at the interface between science and Indigenous knowledge. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33, 1138-1143.
9.
GuilleminM.GillamL.BarnardE.StewartP.WalkerH.RosenthalD. (2016a). “Doing trust”: How researchers conceptualize and enact trust in their research practice. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11, 370-381.
10.
GuilleminM.GillamL.BarnardE.StewartP.WalkerH.RosenthalD. (2016b). “We’re checking them out”: Indigenous and non-Indigenous research participants’ accounts of deciding to be involved in research. International Journal for Equity in Health, 15. doi:10.1186/s12939-016-0301-4
11.
HammJ.LeeJ.TrinknerR.WingroveT.LebenS.BreuerC. (2016). On the cross-domain scholarship of trust in the institutional context. In ShockleyE.NealT. M. S.PytlikzilligL. M.BornsteinB.H. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on trust (pp. 131-156). New York, NY: Springer.
12.
HardinR. (1991). Trusting persons, trusting institutions. In ZeckhauserR. (Ed.), Strategy and choice (pp. 185-210). Boston, MA: MIT Press.
13.
HardinR. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
KassN.SugarmanJ.FadenR.Schoch-SpanaM. (1996). Trust: The fragile foundation of contemporary biomedical research. The Hastings Centre Report, 26(5), 25-29.
16.
KerasidouA. (2017). Trust me, I’m a researcher! The role of trust in biomedical research. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 20, 43-50.
17.
KimS.LeeJ. (2012). E-participation, transparency, and trust in local government. Public Administration Review, 72, 819-828. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02593.x
18.
KongsholmN.KappelK. (2017). Is consent based on trust morally inferior to consent based on information?Bioethics, 31, 432-442. doi:10.1111/bioe.12342
19.
MacdonaldN.StanwickR.LynkA. (2014). Canada’s shameful history of nutrition research on residential school children: The need for strong medical ethics in aboriginal health research. Paediatrics and Child Health, 19, Article 64.
20.
McDonaldM.TownsendA.CoxS. M.LafrenièreD.PatersonN. (2008). Trust in health research relationships: Accounts of human subjects. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(4), 35-47.
21.
MolyneuxC. S.PeshuN.MarshK. (2005). Trust and informed consent: Insights from community members on the Kenyan coast. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 1463-1473. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.073
22.
MouzasS.HennebergS.NaudeP. (2007). Trust and reliance in business relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 41, 1016-1032.
23.
National Health and Medical Research Council. (2015, May). National statement on ethical conduct in human research 2007. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
24.
O’NeillO. (2002a). Autonomy and trust in bioethics: The Gifford lectures 2001. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
O’NeillO. (2002b). A question of trust: The BBC Reith lectures 2002. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
PachecoC.DaleyS.BrownT.FilippiM.GreinerK.DaleyC. (2013). Moving forward: Breaking the cycle of mistrust between American Indians and researchers. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 2152-2159.
27.
PellegrinoE.ThomasmaD. C. (1993). The virtues in medical practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. (2011). “Ethically impossible”: STD research in Guatemala from 1946–1948. Washington DC: US Government Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues.
29.
Vigoda-GadotE. (2007). Citizens’ perceptions of politics and ethics in public administration: A five-year national study of their relationship to satisfaction with services, trust in governance, and voice orientations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 285-305. doi:10.1093/jopart/muj018
