Trust in research is important but not well understood. We examine the ways that researchers understand and practice trust in research. Using a qualitative research design, we interviewed 19 researchers, including eight researchers involved in Australian Indigenous research. The project design focused on sensitive research including research involving vulnerable participants and sensitive research topics. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. We found that researchers’ understanding of trust integrates both the conceptual and concrete; researchers understand trust in terms of how it relates to other similar concepts and how they practice trust in research. This provides a sound basis to better understand trust in research, as well as identifying mechanisms to regain trust when it is lost in research.
AlpertG. P.RojekJ.HansenJ. A. (2013). Building bridges between police researchers and practitioners: Agents of change in a complex world. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
2.
BaierA. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96, 231-260.
3.
BergerR. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15, 219-234.
4.
BradyM. (1981). Some problems of method and theory in Aboriginal research. In CashmanP. (Ed.), Research and the delivery of legal services (pp. 281-285). Sydney, Australia: Law Foundation of New South Wales.
5.
BuchananA. E. (2000). Trust in managed care organizations. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 10(3), 189-212.
6.
CampbellT. D. (2014). A clash of paradigms? Western and indigenous views on health research involving Aboriginal peoples. Nurse Researcher, 21(6), 39-43.
7.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, & Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (2014). Tri-council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Retrieved from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2-2014/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf
8.
CharmazK. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
9.
ChristopherS.WattsV.McCormickA. K. H. G.YoungS. (2008). Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1398-1406.
10.
DamschroderL. J.PrittsJ. L.NebloM. A.KalarickalR. J.CreswellJ. W.HaywardR. A. (2007). Patients, privacy and trust: Patients’ willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 223-235.
11.
DurieM. (2004). Understanding health and illness: Research at the interface between science and indigenous knowledge. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33, 1138-1143.
12.
EadesS. J.ReadA. W. (1999). The Bibbulung Gnarneep Project: Practical implementation of guidelines on ethics in indigenous health research. The Medical Journal of Australia, 170, 433-436.
13.
EdwardsR. (2013). Power and trust: An academic researcher’s perspective on working with interpreters as gatekeepers. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16, 503-514.
14.
GuilleminM.GillamL.BarnardE.StewartP.WalkerH.RosenthalD. (2016). “We’re checking them out”: Indigenous and non-Indigenous research participants’ accounts of deciding to be involved in research. International Journal for Equity in Health, 15(1), Article 8.
15.
GuilleminM.GillamL.RosenthalD.BolithoA. (2010). Resources employed by health researchers to ensure ethical research practice. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(2), 21-34.
16.
GuilleminM.GillamL.RosenthalD.BolithoA. (2012). Human research ethics committees: Examining their roles and practices. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(3), 38-49.
17.
HardinR. (1993). The street-level epistemology of trust. Politics & Society, 21, 505-529.
18.
Health Research Council of New Zealand. (2010). Guidelines for researchers on health research involving Maori 2010. Auckland: Author.
19.
HumpheryK. (2000). Indigenous health and “Western research.”Melbourne, Australia: VicHealth Koori Health Research and Community Development Unit, Centre for the Study of Health & Society, University of Melbourne.
20.
IllingworthP. M. L. (2005). Trusting medicine: The moral costs of managed care. London, England: Routledge.
21.
KahnS. A.RubinD. T. (2016). When subjects violate the research covenant: Lessons learned from a failed clinical trial of fecal microbiota transplantation. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. doi:10.1038/ajg.2016.153
22.
MacDonaldN. E.StanwickR.LynkA. (2014). Canada’s shameful history of nutrition research on residential school children: The need for strong medical ethics in Aboriginal health research. Paediatrics & Child Health, 19(2), Article 64.
23.
McAullayD.AndersonI.GriewR. (2002). The ethics of Aboriginal health research: An annotated bibliography. Parkville, VIC: VicHealth Koori Health Research and Community Development Unit.
24.
McDonaldM.TownsendA.CoxS. M.PatersonN. D.LafrenièreD. (2008). Trust in health research relationships: Accounts of human subjects. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(4), 35-47.
25.
McNoltyL. A.PayneR. (2015). Relying on trust for research on medical practice in learning health systems. The American Journal of Bioethics, 15(9), 30-32.
26.
MiltonC. L. (2012). Trust-mistrust conflicts of interest and nurse research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 25, 133-136.
27.
National Health and Medical Research Council. (2003). Values and ethics: Guidelines for ethical conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research.
28.
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council, & Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee. (2007). National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
29.
PachecoC. M.DaleyS. M.BrownT.FilippiM.GreinerK. A.DaleyC. M. (2013). Moving forward: Breaking the cycle of mistrust between American Indians and researchers. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 2152-2159.
30.
PellegrinoE. D.VeatchR. M.LanganJ. (1991). Ethics, trust, and the professions: Philosophical and cultural aspects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
31.
PirrieA.MacAllisterJ.MacleodG. (2012). Taking flight: Trust, ethics and the comfort of strangers. Ethics and Education, 7, 33-44.
SmithL. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). London, England: Zed Books.
34.
SteinheiderB.WuestewaldT.BoyatzisR. E.KroutterP. (2012). In search of a methodology of collaboration: Understanding researcher–practitioner philosophical differences in policing. Police Practice & Research, 13, 357-374.
35.
StoneM. A.RedsellS. A.LingJ. T.HayA. D. (2005). Sharing patient data: Competing demands of privacy, trust and research in primary care. The British Journal of General Practice: The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 55, 783-789.
36.
WagenknechtS. (2015). Facing the incompleteness of epistemic trust: Managing dependence in scientific practice. Social Epistemology, 29, 160-184.
37.
WallersteinN. B.DuranB. (2006). Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promotion Practice, 7, 312-323.
38.
WallersteinN. B.DuranB. (2010). Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: The intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. American Journal of Public Health, 100(Suppl. 1), S40-S46.
