In this piece, I explore two related issues of new critical Indigenous research. First, building on previous work, I recap the similarities and differences—in terms of social justice issues—of several historical cases regarding Indigenous peoples. I then examine the role of respect—especially “reciprocal respect”—in Pan-Pacific Indigenous research and give exemplars from New Zealand, Filipino, Aboriginal, and Samoan contexts as discussion points that ground a larger examination of mutual respect, mutuality, and cooperative behaviour. Finally, I suggest that the historical treatments of various Indigenous peoples to this day impact upon the form and tenor of critical Indigenous research.
Amituanai-ToloaM. (2006). Tapuia (space made sacred) in bridging research and relationships: Brown culture and commonsensical ethics. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 3(1), 200–219. doi:10.1177/117718010600300111
2.
BishopR. (1999). Kaupapa Maori research: An indigenous approach to creating knowledge. In RobertsonN. (Ed.), Māori and psychology: Research and practice—The proceedings of a symposium sponsored by the Maori and Psychology Research Unit (pp. 1–6). Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato.
3.
BlixB. H. (2015). “Something decent to wear”: Performances of being an insider and an outsider in Indigenous research. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 175–183. doi:10.1177/1077800414542702
4.
BrunerE. M. (2005). Culture on tour: Ethnographies of travel.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
CaimanR. (2003). The treaty of Waitangi.Auckland, New Zealand: Reed Books.
6.
CarlinJ. (2001, November 5). America must learn from Mandela. New Statesman, 130(4562):15–16.
7.
DahlénP. (2014). The Olympic creation as a sacred story: History and myth in Jens Lind's documentaryThe Sunshine Olympics 1912. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 31, 557–569. doi:10.1080/09523367.2014.890185
8.
DenzinN. K. (2008). IRBs and the turn to Indigenous research ethics. In JegatheesanB. (Ed.), Access, a zone of comprehension, and intrusion (pp. 97–123). Bingley, England: Emerald.
9.
GilmanS. C. (2005). Ethics codes and codes of conduct as tools for promoting an ethical and professional public service: Comparative successes and lessons.Washington, DC: PREM, the World Bank. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/mena/governance/35521418.pdf
10.
HornerJ. (2004). Seeking racial justice: An insider's memoir of the movement for Aboriginal advancement.Canberra, Australia: Aboriginal Studies Press.
MaussM. (2002). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies (HallsW. D., Trans.). London, England: Routledge Classics.
14.
NichollsC. (2005). Death by a thousand cuts: Indigenous language bilingual education programmes in the Northern Territory of Australia, 1972–1998. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8, 160–177. doi:10.1080/13670050 508668604
15.
Pe-PuaR. (2015). Indigenous research: Practice and advocacy. In RinehartR. E., emeralde., & MatamuaR. (Eds.), Ethnographies in Pan Pacific research: Tensions and positionings (pp. 89–110). New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
PereR. R. (1997). Te wheke: A celebration of infinite wisdom (2nd ed.). Wairoa, New Zealand: Ao Ako Global Learning.
PohatuW. (2007). The Marae: Nau mai haere mai ki te marae: Welcome to our marae, welcome to our culture.Auckland, New Zealand: Reed Books.
19.
RigneyL.-I. (2006). Indigenist research and Aboriginal Australia. In KunnieJ. E. & GodukaN. I. (Eds.), Indigenous peoples’ wisdom and power: Affirming our knowledge through narratives (pp. 32–48). London, England: Ashgate.
20.
SmithG. (1992, November 23). “Tane-Nui-A-Rangi's legacy … Propping up the sky… “: Kaupapa Maori as resistance and intervention.Paper presented at NZARE/AARE Joint Conference, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
21.
SmithL. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples.London, England: Zed Books.
22.
SmithL. T. (2014). Social justice, transformation and Indigenous methodologies. In RinehartR., BarbourK. N., & PopeC. C. (Eds.), Ethnographic worldviews: Transformations and social justice (pp. 15–20). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
23.
StricklandR. J. (1985–1986). Genocide-at-law: An historic and contemporary view of the Native American experience. University of Kansas Law Review, 34, 713–755.
24.
TuagaluI. (2008). Heuristics of the Vā. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 4(1), 107–126. doi:10.1177/117718010800400110
25.
WendtA. (1996). Tatauing the post-colonial body. Span, 42–43, 15–29.
