Mischief,Mystery,and Moments That Matter

Abstract

Here we challenge the traditional separation of science and art and demonstrate significant ways in which the social sciences can be enriched through performative inquiry. We begin with a brief commentary on philosophic work that detaches representation from observation. In effect, there is no privileged (in principal, accurate, neutral, or objective) representation of a given observation. We then explore the potentials of expanding the repertoire of representation to include forms more traditionally located within the arts. Included are instances of experimental writing, performative monologue, autoethnography as poetry; dramatic performance and visual art as theory. By expanding the repertoire of inquiry in this way, not only are the social sciences enriched but also their capacity to communicate with the surrounding culture.

Keywords

performative inquiry autoethnography qualitative inquiry

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Austin

J. L.

(1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Clifford

(1986). Introduction: Partial truths. In Clifford

Marcus

(Eds.), Writing cultures: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 1-26). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Eliot

T. S.

(1963). The love song of J. Alfred Prufrock. In Eliot

T. S.

(Ed.), Collected poems: 1909-1962 (pp. 3-7). London, England: Faber and Faber.

Emerson

(1983). The outer word and inner speech: Bakhtin, Vygotsky, and the internalization of language. Critical Inquiry, 10, 245-264.

Flax

(1987). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 12, 621-643.

Gergen

K. J.

(1994). Realities and relations: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gergen

K. J.

(2009). An invitation to social construction (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.

Gergen

K. J.

(2012). Playing with purpose: Adventures in performative social science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Left Coast Press.

Harding

(1986). The instability of the analytical categories of feminist theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 11, 645-664.

10.

Janet

(1928). L’évolution de la mémoire et de la notion du temps [The evolution of memory and the notion of time]. Paris, France: L. Alcan.

11.

Kauffman

L. S.

(1986). Discourses of desire: Gender, genre, and epistolary fictions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

12.

Kuhn

(1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

13.

Quine

W. V. O.

(1964). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

14.

Rabuzzi

K. A.

(l988). Motherself: A mythic analysis of motherhood. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

15.

Sprinker

(1980). Fictions of the self: The end of autobiography. In Olney

(Ed.), Autobiography: Essays theoretical and critical (pp. 340-358). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

16.

Wittgenstein

(1953). Philosophical investigations. London, England: Blackwell.