This overview analyses the recent emergence of the concept of alcohols harm to others (AHTO) and the potential policy implications embedded in this research perspective. The overview is an account of ways in which recent alcohol research has grasped the kind of harm that goes beyond the drinker. It positions the dimensions of alcohol's harm to others as a research perspective in relation to other established research approaches to alcohol-related problems.
Findings
Several concepts presented within different disciplines have focused on how adverse consequences of drinking go beyond the individual drinker. However, the scientific discussion is still characterised by an obvious conceptual instability. Alongside the growing research interest in alcohol's harm to others there is a political discourse stressing the urgency of alcohol policy measures protecting innocent victims against damage from others' alcohol use.
Conclusions
In drawing attention to the interactional nature of alcohol-related harm, the AHTO perspective brings a novel syntagmatic and cross-cutting aspect to established traditions in alcohol research and forms a unique scientific approach. The AHTO perspective has the potential for creating a political will to move the alcohol policy agenda forward, but the question of a suitable and credible term is unresolved. Conceptually, the AHTO perspective is still in a state of flux, while politically it is loaded with considerable ambitions and interests related to causal attributions and ethical conclusions embedded in the research perspective.
AIHW (2002). Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2001 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: First results. AIHW cat. no PHE 35. Canberra: AIHW.
2.
BaborT. (2011). Commentary on Laslett et al. (2011): Alcohol-related collateral damage and the broader issue of alcohol's social costs.Addiction, 106(9), 1612–1613.
3.
BaborT., CaetanoR., CasswellS., EdwardsG., GiesbrechtN., GrahamK., GrubeJ., GruenewaldP., HillL., HolderH., HomelR., österbergE., RehmJ., RoomR., & RossowI. (2010). Alcohol: No ordinary commodity. Research and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BaklienB. (1987). Andres fyll [Others' drinking].Tidsskrift om edruskapsspørsmål, 1, 21–24.
5.
BerryR., & BolandJ. (1977). The economic cost of alcohol abuse.New York: Free Press.
6.
BruunK., EdwardsG., LumioM., MäkeläK., PanL., PophamR. E., RoomR., SchmidtW., SkogO., SulkunenP., & österbergE. (1975). Alcohol control policies in public health perspective.Forssa: The Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies.
7.
BurgessA. (2009). Commentary: The politics of health risk promotion. “Passive drinking”: A “good lie” too far?Health, Risk & Society, 11(6), 527–540.
8.
CasswellS., YouR., & HuckleT. (2011). Alcohol's harm to others: Reduced wellbeing and health status for those with heavy drinkers in their lives.Addiction, 106(6), 1087–1094.
9.
ConnorJ., & CasswellS. (2009). The burden of road trauma due to other peoples' drinking.Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41(5), 1099–1103.
10.
ElianyM., GiesbrechtN., NelsonM., Well-manB. & WortleyS. (1992). Alcohol and other drug use by Canadians: A National Alcohol and Other Drugs Survey (1989). Technical report. Ottawa: Health Canada.
11.
European Commission (2006). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions:An EU strategy to support Member States in reducing alcohol related harm. European Communities, COM 6) 625 final. Luxembourg: European Communities.
12.
FekjaerH. O. (2011, June). Changing paradigms in the alcohol field. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Symposium of the Kettil Bruun Society for Epidemiological and Social Studies on Alcohol, Melbourne.
13.
FillmoreK. M. (1985). The social victims of drinking.British Journal of Addiction, 80(3), 307–314.
14.
GiesbrechtN., CukierS., & SteevesD. (2010). Collateral damage from alcohol: Implications of “second-hand effects of drinking” for populations and health priorities.Addiction, 105(8), 1323–1325.
15.
GiesbrechtN., & WestP. (1997). Drinking patterns and drinking-related benefits, harm and victimization experiences: Reports from community-based general population surveys.Contemporary Drug Problems, 24, 557–579.
16.
GmelG., RehmJ., RoomR., & GreenfieldT. K. (2000). Dimensions of alcohol-related social and health consequences in survey research.Journal of Substance Abuse, 12(1–2), 113–138.
17.
GreenfieldT. K., Karriker-JaffeK. J., GiesbrechtN., KerrW. C., YeY., & BondJ. (2014). Second-hand drinking may increase support for alcohol policies: New results from the 2010 National Alcohol Survey.Drug and Alcohol Review, 33(3), 259–267.
18.
GreenfieldT. K., YeY., KerrW., BondJ., RehmJ., & GiesbrechtN. (2009). Externalities from alcohol consumption in the 2005 National Alcohol Survey: Implications for policy.International Journal of Environ Research and Public Health, 6(12), 3205–3224.
19.
HolderH. (1998). Alcohol and the community: A systems approach to prevention.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
HolderH., GruenewaldP. J., PonickiW. R., TrenoA. J., GrubeJ. W., SaltzR. F., VoasR. B., ReynoldsR., DavisJ., SanchezL., GaumontG., & RoeperP. (2000). Effect of community-based interventions on high-risk drinking and alcohol-related injuries.JAMA, 284(18), 2341–2347.
21.
HolmilaM. (2011). Getting the full picture of alcohol's burden in the society. Commentary on Casswell et al.Addiction, 106(6), 1095–1096.
JohanssonP., JarlJ., ErikssonA., GerdthamU. G., Hemströmö., SelinK. H, LenkeL., RamstedtM., & RoomR. (2006). The social costs of alcohol in Sweden 2002. SoRAD, Forskningsrapport nr 36. SoRAD: Stockholm.
24.
JonesR. J., & GreenfieldT. K. (1991). Alcohol and other drug problems in Marin County, California: Results from a general population survey. San Rafael, CA: Marin Institute for the Prevention of Alcohol and Other Drug Problems.
25.
KlingemannH., & GmelG. (Eds.) (2001). Mapping the social consequences of alcohol consumption. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26.
LangleyJ. D., KypriK., & StephensonS. C. R. (2003). Secondhand effects of alcohol use among university students: Computerised survey.British Medical Journal, 327, 1023.
27.
LaslettA.-M. (2012, August). The cultural, societal and historical development leading up to the increasing policy significance of alcohol's harm to others. Paper presented at the Nordic Alcohol and Drug Researchers' Assembly, Copenhagen.
28.
LaslettA. M., CatalanoP., ChikritzhsT., DaleC., DoranC., FerrisJ., JainullabudeenT., LivingstonM., MatthewsS., MugavinJ., RoomR., SchlotterleinM., & WilkinsonC. (2010). The range and magnitude of alcohol's harm to others.Fitzroy, Victoria: AER Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre.
29.
LaslettA.-M.RoomR., FerrisJ., WilkinsonC., LivingstonM., & MugavinJ. (2011). Surveying the range and magnitude of alcohol's harm to others in Australia.Addiction, 106(9), 1603–1611.
30.
LeuR., & LutzP. (1977). Economic aspects of alcohol consumption in Switzerland. Zürich: Schulthess.
31.
LevineH. (1993). Temperance cultures: Concern about alcohol problems in Nordic and English-speaking cultures. In LaderM., EdwardsG., & DrummondD. C. (Eds.), The nature of alcohol and drug-related problems (pp.16–36). New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
MäkeläK. (2012). Cost-of-alcohol studies as a research programme.Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 29(4), 321–343.
33.
MäkeläK., & RoomR. (1985). Alcohol policy and the rights of the drunkard.Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 9(1), 2–5.
34.
MäkeläP., FonagerK., HibellB., NordlundS., SabroeS., & SimpuraJ. (1999). Drinking habits in the Nordic countries. SIFA rapport Nr. 2. Oslo: Statens institutt for alkohol- og narkotikaforskning.
35.
MantonE., MacLeanS., LaslettA.-M., & RoomR. (2014). Alcohol's harm to others: Using qualitative research to complement survey findings.International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research, 3(2), 143–148.
36.
NavarroH. J., DoranC. M., & ShakeshaftA. P. (2011). Measuring costs of alcohol harm to others: A review of the literature.Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 114(2–3), 87–99.
37.
PeltonenM. (1988). Viinapäästä kolerakauhuun. Kirjoituksia sosiaalihistoriasta [From weak tolerance to alcohol to the horror of cholera. Writings in social history]. Helsinki: Hanki ja jää.
38.
RehmJ., BaliunasD., BrochuS., FischerB., GnamW., PatraJ., PopovaS., Sarnocinska-HartA., & TaylorB. (2006). The costs of substance abuse in Canada 2002. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
39.
RehmJ., & GmelG. (1999). Patterns of alcohol consumption and social consequences: Results from an 8-year follow-up study in Switzerland.Addiction, 94(6), 899–912.
40.
RoizenR. (2004). How does the nation's “alcohol problem” change from era to era? Stalking the social logic of problem-definition transformations since Repeal. In TracyS. & AckerC. (Eds.), Altering the American consciousness: Essays on the history of alcohol and drug use in the United States, 1800– 2000 (pp. 61–87). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. Retrieved from http://www.roizen.com/ron/postrepeal.htm.
41.
RoomR. (1996). Alcohol consumption and social harm: Conceptual issues and historical perspectives.Contemporary Drug Problems, 23(3), 373–388.
42.
RoomR. (1998). Drinking patterns and alcohol-related social problems: Framework for analysis in developing societies.Drug and Alcohol Review, 17(4), 389–398.
43.
RoomR. (2000). Concepts and items in measuring social harm from drinking.Journal of Substance Abuse, 12, 93–111.
44.
RoomR. (2008, June). Thinking about measuring alcohol's harm to others. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Alcohol Epidemiology Symposium of the Kettil Bruun Society, Victoria, BC, Canada.
45.
RoomR., FerrisJ., LaslettA.-M., LivingstonM., MugavinJ., & WilkinsonC. (2010). The drinker's effect on the social environment: A conceptual framework for studying alcohol's harm to others.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 7(4), 1855–1871.
46.
RoomR., HellmanM., & SteniusK. (2015). Addiction: The dance between concept and terms.The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research, 4(1), 27–35.
47.
RossowI., & HaugeR. (2004). Who pays for the drinking? Characteristics of the extent and distribution of social harms from others' drinking.Addiction, 99(9), 1094–102.
SingleE., CollinsD., EastonB., HarwoodH., LapsleyH., KoppP., & WilsonE. (2003). International guidelines for estimating the costs of substance abuse. Second edition. Switzerland: World Health Organization.
50.
SingleE., CollinsD., EastonB., HarwoodH., LapsleyH., & MaynardA. (1996). International guidelines on estimating the costs of substance abuse.Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
51.
SulkunenP. (2000). The liberal arguments. In SulkunenP., SuttonC., TigerstedtC., & WarpeniusK. (Eds.), Broken spirits: Power and ideas in Nordic alcohol control (pp. 67–91). NAD publication 39. Helsinki: NAD publication.
52.
SulkunenP. (2009). The saturated society. Governing risk and lifestyles in consumer society.London: SAGE Publications.
53.
SulkunenP., & WarsellL. (2012). Universalism against particularism. Kettil Bruun and the ideological background of the total consumption model.Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 29(3), 217–232.
54.
TigerstedtC. (2001). The dissolution of the alcohol policy field: Studies on the Nordic Countries. University of Helsinki. Department of Social Policy. Research Reports 1/2001. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
55.
WarpeniusK.HolmilaM. & TigerstedtC. (Eds.) (2013). Alkoholi- ja päihdehaitat läheisille, muille ihmisille ja yhteiskunnalle [Alcohol- and drug-related harm to other people and society]Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare.
56.
WarpeniusK., & SuttonC. (2000). The ideal of the alcohol-free society. In SulkunenP., SuttonC., TigerstedtC., & WarpeniusK. (Eds.), Broken spirits: Power and ideas in Nordic alcohol control (pp. 45–66). NAD publication 39. Helsinki: NAD publication.
57.
World Health Organization WHO (2007). WHO expert committee on problems related to alcohol consumption. WHO Technical report series 944. Geneva: WHO.
58.
World Health Organization WHO (2009). Global health risks: Mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva: WHO.
59.
World Health Organization WHO (2010). Global strategy to reduce the harmful use of alcohol. Geneva: WHO.
