This article provides a framework that can be used to design a metrics system for organizations with multiple stakeholders and shows how it can be applied in the area of corporate social responsibility (CSR). The authors propose that the effort to identify, collect, and calibrate metrics is critical for the diffusion of CSR activities across corporations because metrics allow the goals of different stakeholders to be expressed in terms of a single common denominator. The authors propose the AGREE model, which incorporates multiple stakeholders (audiences); multiple value functions (goals); the inputs, commitments, and actions needed to realize the consensus goals (resources); intertemporal returns (effectiveness); and the costs of such actions (efficiency). This approach leads to a set of metrics that can be used to assess the impact of CSR actions on stakeholders beyond the company's customers, collaborators, and competitors to the larger community. The article concludes with an examination of the issues involved in harnessing CSR metrics to evaluate performance and guide future actions.
AlexanderGordon J., and BuchholzRogene A. (1978), “Corporate Social Performance and Stock Market Performance,”Academy of Management Journal, 21(3), 479–86.
2.
AlloucheJose, and LarochePatrice (2005), “A Meta-Analytical Investigation of the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance,”Revue de Gestion des Resources Humaines, 57, 18–41.
3.
ArlowPeter, and GannonMartin J. (1982), “Social Responsiveness, Corporate Structure, and Economic Performance,”Academy of Management Review, 7(2), 235–41.
4.
Avi-YonahReuven S. (2005), “The Cyclical Transformations of the Corporate Form: A Historical Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility,”Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 30(3), 767–818.
5.
BackhausKristin B., StoneBrett A., and HeinerKarl (2002), “Exploring the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness,”Business and Society, 41(3), 292–318.
6.
BarthMary E., and McNicholsMaureen F. (1995), “Estimation and Market Valuation of Environmental Liabilities Relating to Superfund Sites,”Journal of Accounting Research, 32(3), 177–209.
7.
BelkaouiAhmed (1976), “The Impact of the Disclosure of the Environmental Effects of Organizational Behavior on the Market,”Financial Management, 5(4), 26–31.
8.
BelkaouiAhmed, and KarpikPhilip G. (1989), “Determinants of the Corporate Decision to Disclose Social Information,”Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2(1), 36–51.
9.
BhattacharyaC.B., and KorschunDaniel (2008), “Stakeholder Marketing: Beyond the Four Ps and the Customer,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 27(Spring), 113–16.
10.
BhattacharyaC.B., and SenSankar (2004), “Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives,”California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.
11.
BlacconiereWalter G., and PattenDennis M. (1994), “Environmental Disclosures, Regulatory Costs, and Changes in Firm Value,”Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18(3), 149–78.
CampbellJohn L. (2007), “Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility,”Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–67.
14.
CarrollArchie B. (1979), “A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance,”Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.
15.
CarrollArchie B. (1991), “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders,”Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
16.
CarrollArchie B. (1999), “Corporate Social Responsibility,”Business and Society, 38(3), 268–95.
17.
ChenKung H., and MetcalfRichard W. (1980), “The Relationship Between Pollution Control Record and Financial Indicators Revisited,”Accounting Review, 55(1), 168–77.
18.
DavidsonWallace N., and WorrellDan L. (1988), “The Impact of Announcements of Corporate Illegalities on Shareholder Returns,”Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 195–200.
19.
DavidsonWallace N., and WorrellDan L. (1992), “The Effect of Product Recall Announcements on Shareholder Wealth,”Strategic Management Journal, 13(6), 467–73.
20.
ElkingtonJohn (1994), “Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development,”California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.
21.
ElkingtonJohn (1998), Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business.Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
22.
ForbusPamela (2007), talk given at the Stakeholder Marketing Consortium, Aspen, Colorado (September 15).
23.
FrankRobert (2007), Richistan: A Journey Through the American Wealth Boom and the Lives of the New Rich.New York: Crown Publishers.
24.
FrederickShane, LoewensteinGeorge, and O'DonoghueTed (2002), “Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review,”Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351–401.
25.
FreedmanMartin, and JaggiBikki (1982), “An Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Pollution Disclosures Included in Annual Financial Statements on Investors’ Decisions,” in Advances in Public Interest Accounting, Vol. 1, NeimarkMarilyn, ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 193–212.
26.
FriedmanMilton (1970), “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits,”New York Times Magazine, (September 13), 32–33, 122, 124, 126.
27.
FroomanJeff (1997), “Socially Irresponsible and Illegal Behavior and Shareholder Wealth: A Meta-Analysis of Event Studies,”Business and Society, 36(3), 221–49.
28.
GoyalAshima (2006), “Corporate Social Responsibility as a Signaling Device for FDI,”International Journal of the Economics of Business, 13(1), 145–63.
29.
GrossmanBlake R., and SharpeWilliam F. (1986), “Financial Implications of South African Divestment,”Financial Analysts Journal, 42(July-August), 15–29.
30.
HamiltonJames T. (1995), “Pollution as News: Media and Stock Market Reactions to the Toxics Release Inventory Data,”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(1), 98–113.
31.
HamiltonSally, JoHoje, and StatmanMeir (1993), “Doing Well While Doing Good? The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds,”Financial Analyst Journal, 49(6), 62–66.
32.
HarjotoMaretno A., and JoHoje (2007), “Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility,” working paper, Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University.
33.
HarperRichard K., and AdamsStephen C. (1996), “CERCLA and Deep Pockets: Market Response to the Superfund Program,”Contemporary Economic Policy, 14(1), 107–115.
34.
HartStuart L., and AhujaGautam (1996), “Does It Pay to Be Green? An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Emission Reduction and Firm Performance,”Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30–37.
35.
HermalinBenjamin E. (2005), “Trends in Corporate Governance,”Journal of Finance, 60(5), 2351–84.
36.
HillRonald P., AinscoughThomas, ShankTodd, and ManullangDaryl (2007), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Socially Responsible Investing: A Global Perspective,”Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 165–74.
37.
IngramRobert W. (1978), “An Investigation of the Information Content of (Certain) Social Responsibility Disclosures,”Journal of Accounting Research, 16(2), 270–85.
38.
JarrellGregg, and PeltzmanSam (1985), “The Impact of Product Recalls on the Wealth of Sellers,”Journal of Political Economy, 93(3), 512–36.
39.
JensenMichael (2002), “Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function,”Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–56.
40.
KanterRosabeth M. (1999), “From Spare Change to Real Change: The Social Sector as Beta Site for Business Innovation,”Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 123–32.
41.
KarpoffJonathan M., and LottJohn R. (1993), “The Reputational Penalty Firms Bear from Committing Criminal Fraud,”Journal of Law and Economics, 36(2), 757–802.
42.
KarpoffJonathan M., LottJohn R., and WehrlyEric W. (2005), “The Reputational Penalties for Environmental Violations: Empirical Evidence,”Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), 653–75.
KnackStephen, and KeeferPhilip (1997), “Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 295–321.
46.
KonarShameek, and CohenMark (2001), “Does the Market Value Environmental Performance?”Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281–89.
47.
KreanderNiklas, GrayRob H., PowerDavid M., and SinclairC.D. (2005), “Evaluating the Performance of Ethical and Non-Ethical Funds: A Matched Pair Analysis,”Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(7-8), 1465–93.
48.
LemonKatherine N., and SeidersKathleen (2005), “Making Marketing Accountable: A Broader View,” in Does Marketing Need Reform?ShethJ., and SisodiaR., eds. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 201–208.
49.
LuckChristopher, and PilotteNancy (1993), “Domini Social Index Performance,”Journal of Investing, 2(Fall), 60–62.
50.
LuoXueming, and BhattacharyaC.B. (2006), “Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value,”Journal of Marketing, 70(October), 1–18.
51.
MargolisJoshua D., ElfenbeinHillary A., and WalshJames P. (2007), “Does It Pay to Be Good? A Meta-Analysis and Redirection of Research on Corporate Social and Financial Performance,” working paper, Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley.
52.
MargolisJoshua D., and WalshJames P. (2003), “Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.
53.
Marketing Science Institute (2008), 2008-2010 Research Priorities: A Guide to MSI Research Programs and Procedures.Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
54.
McWilliamsAbagail, and SiegelDonald (2001), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?”Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.
55.
MickDavid (2007), “The End(s) of Marketing and the Neglect of Moral Responsibility by the American Marketing Association,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 26(Fall), 289–92.
56.
MooreGeoffrey (1999), Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling Technology Products to Mainstream Customers.New York: Capstone Publishing.
57.
MorrisseyDaniel J. (1989), “Toward a New/Old Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility,”Syracuse Law Review, 40, 1005–1039.
58.
NakaoYuriko, AmanoAkihiro, MatsumuraKanichiro, GenbaKiminori, and NakanoMakiko (2007), “Relationship Between Environmental Performance and Financial Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Japanese Corporations,”Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(2), 106–118.
59.
NavarroPeter (1988), “Why Do Corporations Give to Charity?”Journal of Business, 61(1), 65–93.
60.
OrlitzkyMarc, SchmidtFrank L., and RynesSara L. (2003), “Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis,”Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.
61.
PelozaJohn (2006), “Using Corporate Social Responsibility as Insurance for Financial Performance,”California Management Review, 48(2), 52–72.
62.
RayDebraj (1998), Development Economics.New York: Princeton University Press.
63.
RosenbloomJerry S. (2001), The Handbook of Employee Benefits, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
64.
RustRoland T., LemonKatherine N., and ZeithamlValarie A. (2004), “Return on Marketing: Using Customer Equity to Focus Marketing Strategy,”Journal of Marketing, 68(January), 109–127.
65.
SandelandsLloyd E. (2003), “The Argument for God from Organization Studies,”Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(10), 1–10.
66.
SauerDavid (1997), “The Impact of Social-Responsibility Screens on Investment Performance: Evidence from the Domini 400 Social Index and Domini Equity Mutual Fund,”Review of Financial Economics, 6(2), 137–49.
67.
SchnietzKaren E., and EpsteinMarc J. (2005), “Exploring the Financial Value of a Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility During a Crisis,”Corporate Reputation Review, 7(4), 327–45.
68.
SchwartzRobert (1968), “Corporate Philanthropic Contributions,”Journal of Finance, 23(3), 479–97.
69.
SenSankar, and BhattacharyaC.B. (2001), “Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38(May), 225–43.
70.
SenSankar, BhattacharyaC.B., and KorschunDaniel (2006), “The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Strengthening Multiple Stakeholder Relationships: A Field Experiment,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–66.
71.
ShankTodd, ManullangDaryl, and HillRon (2005), “Doing Well While Doing Good Revisited: A Study of Socially Responsible Firms’ Short-Term Versus Long-Term Performance,”Managerial Finance, 31(8), 33–46.
72.
SiltenBobbi (2007), talk given at the Stakeholder Marketing Consortium, Aspen, Colorado (September 14).
73.
SparDebora L., and La MureLane T. (2003), “The Power of Activism,”Assessing the Impact of NGOs on Global Business, 45(3), 78–101.
74.
SrinivasanShuba, and HanssensDominique (2009), “Marketing and Firm Value: Metrics, Methods, Findings, and Future Directions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36(June), 293–312.
Van de VeldeEveline, VermeirWim, and CortenFilip (2005), “Finance and Accounting: Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance,”Corporate Governance, 5(3), 129–38.
78.
VershoorCurtis C. (1998), “A Study of the Link Between a Corporation's Financial Performance and Its Commitment to Ethics,”Journal of Business Ethics, 17(13), 1509–1516.
79.
WalshJames P. (2005), “Taking Stock of Stakeholder Theory,”Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 426–38.
80.
HarwellWells C.A. (2002), “The Cycles of Corporate Social Responsibility: An Historical Retrospective for the Twenty-First Century,”Kansas Law Review, 51(November), 77–140.
