Corporate social initiatives (CSIs) are increasingly important in boosting public acceptance for companies, and emerging research suggests corporate social marketing (CSM) could be the most effective type of CSI. However, scholars caution that CSM is not a one-size-fits-all. Through a content analysis of Coca-Cola’s social media posts on potentially controversial topics related to sustainability, health, and social change, this study explores how CSI type and message content influence public response to an organization’s social media corporate social responsibility posts. Posts emphasizing socially responsible business practices generally received the most favorable public response, while posts focused on cause promotion were received the most negatively. Findings also suggest that CSM is less effective when the issue and advocated behavior change appears to be acting against the company’s interests.
AndreasenA. R. (1994). Social marketing: Its definition and domain. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 13, 108–114.
2.
BhattacharyaC. B. (1999). Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Social Marketing Quarterly, 5, 14–15.
3.
BhattacharyaC. B.SenS. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47, 9–24. doi:10.2307/41166284
ColleoniE. (2013). CSR communication strategies for organizational legitimacy in social media. Corporate Communications, 18, 228–248. doi:10.1108/13563281311319508
9.
ConeC. L.FeldmanM. A.DaSilvaA. T. (2003). Causes and effects. Harvard Business Review, 81(7), 95–101.
10.
DahlS. (2010). Current themes in social marketing research: Text-mining the past five years. Social Marketing Quarterly, 16, 128–136.
11.
DahlsrudA. (2006). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1–13. doi:10.1002/csr.132
12.
DarmonK.FitzpatrickK.BronsteinC. (2008). Krafting the obesity message: A case study in framing and issues management. Public Relations Review, 34, 373–379.
13.
de BakkerF. G. A.den HondF. (2008). Activists’ influence tactics and corporate policies. Business Communication Quarterly, 71, 107–111.
14.
DellarocasC. (2003). The digitization of word-of-mouth: Promise and challenges of online reputation systems. Management Science, 49, 1407–1424. doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1407.17308
15.
EinwillerS. A.SteilenS. (2014). Handling complaints on social network sites—An analysis of complaints and complaint responses on Facebook and Twitter pages of large US companies. Public Relations Review. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.012
16.
EllenP. S.WebbD. J.MohrL. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 147–157. doi:10.1177/0092070305284976
17.
EtterM. (2013). Reasons for low levels of interactivity: (Non-) interactive CSR communication in Twitter. Public Relations Review, 39, 606–608.
GrozaM. D.PronschinskeM. R.WalkerM. (2011). Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 639–652. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0834-9
20.
HayesA. F.KrippendorffK. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89. doi:10.1080/19312450709336664
21.
HerrickC. (2009). Shifting blame/selling health: Corporate social responsibility in the age of obesity. Sociology of Health and Illness, 31, 51–65.
22.
HoefflerS.KellerK. L. (2002). Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21, 78–89. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jppm.21.1.78.17600
23.
JUST Capital. (2015). The research: How does America define just corporate behavior. Retrieved September 29, 2015, fromhttp://justcapital.com/research/
KimH. S. (2011). A reputational approach examining publics’ attributions on corporate social responsibility motives. Asian Journal of Communication, 21, 84–101. doi:10.1080/01292986.2010.524230
26.
KimY. (2014). Strategic communication of corporate social responsibility (CSR): Effects of stated motives and corporate reputation on stakeholder responses. Public Relations Review, 40, 838–840.
27.
KimS. Y.ReberB. H. (2008). Public relations place in corporate social responsibility: Practitioners define their role. Public Relations Review, 34, 337–342. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.07.003
28.
KotlerP.HessekielD.LeeN. (2012). Good works! Marketing and corporate initiatives that build a better world … and the bottom line. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
29.
KotlerP.LeeN. (2005a). Best of breed: When it comes to gaining a market edge while supporting a social cause, “corporate social marketing” leads the pack. Social Marketing Quarterly, 11, 91–103. doi:10.1080/15245000500414480
30.
KotlerP.LeeN. (2005b). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
31.
KrippendorffK. (2004a). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
LacyS.RiffeD. (1996). Sampling error and selecting intercoder reliability samples for nominal content categories: Sins of omission and commission in mass communication quantitative research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 969–973. doi:10.1177/107769909607300414
34.
LeeN.AschermannK.EhrmannR.MintzJ. (2005). The challenges and rewards of partnering with the private sector to achieve social marketing objectives. Social Marketing Quarterly, 11, 51–59. doi:10.1080/15245000500308963
35.
LeeN.KotlerP. (2015). Social marketing: Changing behaviors for good. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
MenonS.KahnB. E. (2001). Corporate sponsorships of philanthropic activities: Do they help the sponsor?Social Marketing Quarterly, 7, 76–79.
37.
MorenoA.CapriottiP. (2009). Communicating CSR, citizenship and sustainability on the web. Journal of Communication Management, 13, 157–175. doi:10.1108/13632540910951768
38.
PerezA.del BosqueI. R. (2013). Extending on the formation process of CSR image. Social Marketing Quarterly, 19, 156–171.
39.
SchwarzA. (2012). How publics use social media to respond to blame games in crisis communication: The Love Parade tragedy in Duisburg 2010. Public Relations Review, 38, 430–437.
40.
SenS.BhattacharyaC. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 225–243.
41.
SmithE. (2012). Corporate image and public health: An analysis of the Phillip Morris, Kraft, and Nestle websites. Journal of Health Communication, 17, 582–600.
42.
SmithK. T.AlexanderJ. J. (2013). Which CSR related headings do Fortune 500 companies use on their websites?Business Communication Quarterly, 76, 155–171.
43.
SniderJ.HillR.MartinD. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world’s most successful firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 48, 175–187.
44.
VanhammeJ.GrobbenB. (2009). Too good to be true! The effectiveness of CSR history in countering negative publicity. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 273–283.
45.
VestergaardA. (2015). Facebook and the public framing of a corporate crisis. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20, 163–177.
46.
WalkerM.HeereB.ParentM. M.DraneD. (2010). Social responsibility and the Olympic Games: The mediating role of consumer attributions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 77–91. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0445-x
47.
WimmerR.DominickJ. (2013). Mass media research: An introduction (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
48.
ZerfassA.MorenoA.TenchR.VercicD.VerhoevenP. (2013). European communication monitor 2013: A changing landscape—Managing crises, digital communication and CEO positioning in Europe. Results of a survey in 43 countries. Brussels, Belgium: EACD/EUPRERA, Helios Media.
