This research relied on a field experiment involving a real-world instance of corporate philanthropy to shed light on both the scope and limitations of the strategic returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR). In particular, the authors demonstrate that the impact of CSR in the real world is not only less pervasive than has been previously acknowledged but also more multifaceted than has been previously conceptualized. The findings indicated that contingent on CSR awareness, which was rather low, stakeholders did react positively to the focal company not only in the consumption domain but in the employment and investment domains as well. Stakeholder attributions regarding the genuineness of the company’s motives moderated these effects.
Alsop, Ronald. 2002. “For a Company, Charitable Works Are Best Carried Out Discreetly.”The Wall Street JournalJanuary 16.
2.
Baron, Reuben M. and David A. Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51 (December): 1173-1182.
3.
Barone, Michael J., Anthony D. Miyazaki, and Kimberly A. Taylor. 2000. “The Influence of Cause-Related Marketing on Consumer Choice: Does One Good Turn Deserve Another?”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science28 (Spring): 248-263.
4.
Bhattacharya, C. B. and Sankar Sen. 2003. “Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationship With Companies.”Journal of Marketing67 (April): 76-88.
5.
Bhattacharya, C. B. and Sankar Sen. 2004. “Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives.”California Management Review47 (Fall): 9-25.
6.
Brown, Tom J. and Peter A. Dacin. 1997. “The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses.”Journal of Marketing61 (January): 68-85
7.
Brown, Tom J., Peter A. Dacin., Michael G. Pratt, and David A. Whetten. 2006. “Identity, Intended Image, Construed Image, and Reputation: An Interdisciplinary Framework and Suggested Terminology.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science34(2): 99-106.
8.
Cone. 2004“Cone Corporate Citizenship Study.” Research Report. Boston: Cone.
9.
Donaldson, Thomas and Lee E. Preston. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications.”Academy of Management Review20 (1): 65-92.
10.
Ellen, Pam Scholder, Deborah J. Webb, and Lois A. Mohr. 2006. “Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Social Responsibility Programs.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science34(2): 147-157.
11.
Fein, Steven. 1996. “Effects of Suspicion on Attributional Thinking and the Correspondence Bias.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology70 (June): 1164-1184.
12.
Forehand, Mark R. and Sonya Grier. 2003. “When Is Honesty the Best Policy? The Effect of Stated Company Intent on Consumer Skepticism.”Journal of Consumer Psychology13 (3): 349-357.
13.
Greening, D. W., and D. B. Turban. 2000. “Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce.”Business & Society39 (3): 254-280.
14.
Gourville, John T. and V. Kasturi Rangan. 2004. “Valuing the Cause Marketing Relationship.”California Management Review47 (Fall): 38-58.
15.
Kerlinger, F. N.1986. Foundations of Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
16.
Klein, Jill and Niraj Dawar. 2004. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumers’ Attributions and Brand Evaluations in a Product-Harm Crisis.”International Journal of Research in Marketing21 (3): 203-217.
17.
Lichtenstein, Donald R., Minette E. Drumwright, and Bridgette M. Braig. 2004. “The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Donations to Corporate-Supported Nonprofits.”Journal of Marketing68 (October): 16-33.
18.
Maignan, Isabelle, and O. C. Ferrell. 2004. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science32 (Winter): 3-19.
19.
Paul, Peter J., Gilbert A Churchill, Jr., and Tom Brown. 1993. “Caution in the Use of Difference Scores in Consumer Research.”Journal of Consumer Research19 (March): 655-677.
20.
Sen, Sankar and C. B. Bhattacharya. 2001. “Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility.”Journal of Marketing Research38 (May): 43-62.
21.
Smith, N. Craig2003. “Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How?”California Management Review45 (Summer): 1-25.
22.
Turban, D. B. and D. W. Greening. 1997. “Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees.”Academy of Management Journal40 (3): 658-763.
23.
Ulrich, Dave and Norm Smallwood. 2004. “Capitalizing on Capabilities.”Harvard Business Review82 (June): 119-128.
