To complement their in-house, designer-driven efforts, companies are increasingly experimenting with crowdsourcing initiatives in which they invite their user communities to generate new product ideas. Although innovation scholars have begun to analyze the objective promise of crowdsourcing, the current research is unique in pointing out that merely marketing the source of design to customers might bring about an incremental increase in product sales. The findings from two randomized field experiments reveal that labeling crowdsourced new products as such—that is, marketing the product as “customer-ideated” at the point of purchase versus not mentioning the specific source of design—increased the product's actual market performance by up to 20%. Two controlled follow-up studies reveal that the effect observed in two distinct consumer goods domains (food and electronics) can be attributed to a quality inference: consumers perceive “customer-ideated” products to be based on ideas that address their needs more effectively, and the corresponding design mode is considered superior in generating promising new products.
AfuahAllan, and TucciChristopher L. (2012), “Crowdsourcing as a Solution to Distant Search,”Academy of Management Review, 37 (3), 355–75.
2.
BanerjeeAbhijit V. (1992), “A Simple Model of Herd Behavior,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107 (3), 797–817.
3.
BayusBarry L. (2013), “Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community,”Management Science, 59 (1), 226–44.
4.
BertrandMarianne, KarlinDean, MullainathanSendhil, ShafirEldar, and ZinmanJonathan (2010), “What's Advertising Content Worth? Evidence from a Consumer Credit Marketing Field Experiment,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125 (1), 263–306.
5.
BilkeyWarren J., and NesErik (1982), “Country-of-Origin Effects on Product Evaluations,”Journal of International Business Studies, 13 (1), 89–100.
6.
BoudreauKevin J., LaceteraNicola, and LakhaniKarim R. (2011), “Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis,”Management Science, 57 (5), 843–63.
7.
DahlDarren W., FuchsChristoph, and SchreierMartin (2015), “Why and When Consumers Prefer Products of User-Driven Firms: A Social Identification Account,”Management Science, 61 (8), 1978–88.
8.
FlintDaniel J., HoytChris, and SwiftNancy (2014), Shopper Marketing: Profiting from the Place Where Suppliers, Brand Manufacturers, and Retailers Connect. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
9.
FrankeNikolaus, PoetzMarion K., and SchreierMartin (2014), “Integrating Problem Solvers from Analogous Markets in New Product Ideation,”Management Science, 60 (4), 1063–81.
10.
FrankeNikolaus, von HippelEric, and SchreierMartin (2006), “Finding Commercially Attractive User Innovations: A Test of Lead User Theory,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23 (4), 301–15.
11.
FuchsChristoph, PrandelliEmanuela, and SchreierMartin (2010), “The Psychological Effects of Empowerment Strategies on Consumers' Product Demand,”Journal of Marketing, 74 (January), 65–79.
12.
FuchsChristoph, PrandelliEmanuela, SchreierMartin, and DahlDarren W. (2013), “All That Is Users Might Not Be Gold: How Labeling Products as User Designed Backfires in the Context of Luxury Fashion Brands,”Journal of Marketing, 77 (September), 75–91.
13.
FuchsChristoph, and SchreierMartin (2011), “Customer Empowerment in New Product Development,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (1), 17–32.
14.
FuchsChristoph, SchreierMartin, and van OsselaerStijn M.J. (2015), “The Handmade Effect: What's Love Got to Do with It?”Journal of Marketing, 79 (March), 98–110.
15.
GirotraKaran, TerwieschChristian, and UlrichKarl T. (2010), “Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea.,”Management Science, 56 (4), 591–605.
HarrisonGlenn W., and ListJohn A. (2004), “Field Experiments,”Journal of Economic Literature, 42 (December), 1009–55.
18.
HoweJeff (2006), “The Rise of Crowdsourcing,”Wired, 14 (6), 1–4.
19.
JensenMorten B., HienerthChristoph, and LettlChristopher (2014), “Forecasting the Commercial Attractiveness of User‐Generated Designs Using Online Data: An Empirical Study Within the LEGO User Community,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31 (S1), 75–93.
20.
JeppesenLars Bo, and FrederiksenLars (2006), “Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments,”Organization Science, 17 (1), 45–63.
21.
JeppesenLars Bo, and LakhaniKarim R. (2010), “Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search,”Organization Science, 21 (5), 1016–33.
22.
JohanssonL., HaglundÅ., BerglundL., LeaP., and RisvikE. (1999), “Preference for Tomatoes, Affected by Sensory Attributes and Information About Growth Conditions,”Food Quality and Preference, 10 (4), 289–98.
23.
KardesFrank R., PosavacSteven S., and CronleyMaria L. (2004), “Consumer Inference: A Review of Processes, Bases, and Judgment Contexts,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (3), 230–56.
24.
KornishLaura J., and UlrichKarl T. (2014), “The Importance of the Raw Idea in Innovation: Testing the Sow's Ear Hypothesis,”Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (February), 14–26.
25.
LilienGary L., MorrisonPamela D., SearlsKathleen, SonnackMary, and von HippelEric (2002), “Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-Generation Process for New Product Development,”Management Science, 48 (8), 1042–59.
26.
MoreauC. Page, and HerdKelly B. (2010), “To Each His Own? How Comparisons with Others Influence Consumers’ Evaluations of Their Self-Designed Products,”Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (5), 806–19.
27.
NishikawaHidehiko, SchreierMartin, and OgawaSusumu (2013), “User-Generated Versus Designer-Generated Products: A Performance Assessment at Muji,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30 (2), 160–67.
28.
OgawaSusumu, and PillerFrank T. (2006), “Reducing the Risks of New Product Development.,”MIT Sloan Management Review, 47 (2), 65–71.
29.
PoetzMarion K., and SchreierMartin (2012), “The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas?”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29 (2), 245–56.
30.
RaoAkshay R., and MonroeKent B. (1989), “The Effect of Price, Brand Name, and Store Name on Buyers’ Perceptions of Product Quality: An Integrative Review,”Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (August), 351–57.
31.
SchreierMartin, FuchsChristoph, and DahlDarren W. (2012), “The Innovation Effect of User Design: Exploring Consumers’ Innovation Perceptions of Firms Selling Products Designed by Users,”Journal of Marketing, 76 (July), 18–32.
32.
SchulzeAnja, and HoeglMartin (2008), “Organizational Knowledge Creation and the Generation of New Product Ideas: A Behavioral Approach,”Research Policy, 37 (10), 1742–50.
33.
ShahSonali (2000), “Sources and Patterns of Innovation in a Consumer Products Field: Innovations in Sporting Equipment,”working paper #4105, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
34.
ShethJagdish N. (1972), “The Future of Buyer Behavior Theory,” in Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research. College Park, MD: Association for Consumer Research.
35.
StephenAndrew T., ZubcsekPeter P., and GoldenbergJacob (2016), “Lower Connectivity Is Better: The Effects of Network Structure on Redundancy of Ideas and Customer Innovativeness in Interdependent Ideation Tasks,”Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (April), 263–79.
36.
TerwieschChristian, and UlrichKarl T. (2009), Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
37.
ToubiaOlivier, and FlorèsLaurent (2007), “Adaptive Idea Screening Using Consumers,”Marketing Science, 26 (3), 342–60.
38.
UlrichKarl T. (2007), Design: Creation of Artifacts in Society. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
39.
Von HippelEric (2005), Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
Von HippelEric, de JongJeroen P.J., and FlowersStephen (2012), “Comparing Business and Household Sector Innovation in Consumer Products: Findings from a Representative Study in the United Kingdom,”Management Science, 58 (9), 1669–81.
41.
Von HippelEric, OgawaSusumu, and de JongJeroen P.J. (2011), “The Age of the Consumer-Innovator,”MIT Sloan Management Review, 53 (1), 27–35.
42.
WellsWilliam D. (1993), “Discovery-Oriented Consumer Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (4), 489–504.
43.
ZhangJuanjuan (2010), “The Sound of Silence: Observational Learning in the U.S. Kidney Market,”Marketing Science, 29 (2), 315–35.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
