Many marketing communications are carefully designed to cast a brand in its most favorable light. For example, marketers may prefer to highlight a brand's membership in the top 10 tier of a third-party list instead of disclosing the brand's exact rank. The authors propose that when marketers use these types of imprecise advertising claims, subtle differences in the selection of a tier boundary (e.g., top 9 vs. top 10) can influence consumers’ evaluations and willingness to pay. Specifically, the authors find a comfort tier effect in which a weaker claim that references a less exclusive but commonly used tier boundary can actually lead to higher brand evaluations than a stronger claim that references a more exclusive but less common tier boundary. This effect is attributed to a two-stage process by which consumers evaluate imprecise rank claims. The results demonstrate that consumers have specific expectations for how messages are constructed in marketing communications and may make negative inferences about a brand when these expectations are violated, thus attenuating the positive effect such claims might otherwise have on consumer responses.
AhluwaliaRohini and BurnkrantRobert E. (2004), “Answering Questions About Questions: A Persuasion Knowledge Perspective for Understanding the Effects of Rhetorical Questions,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (1), 26–42.
2.
ArtzNancy and TyboutAlice M. (1999), “The Moderating Impact of Quantitative Information on the Relationship Between Source Credibility and Persuasion: A Persuasion Knowledge Model Interpretation,”Marketing Letters, 10 (1), 51–63.
3.
BalasubramanianSiva K., MathurIke, and ThakurRamendra (2005), “The Impact of High-Quality Firm Achievements on Shareholder Value: Focus on Malcolm Baldrige and J.D. Power and Associates Awards,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33 (4), 413–22.
4.
BettmanJames R., LuceMary Frances, and PayneJohn W. (1998), “Constructive Consumer Choice Processes,”Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (3), 187–217.
5.
BiswasAbhijit and BurtonScot (1993), “Consumer Perceptions of Tensile Price Claims in Advertisements: An Assessment of Claim Types Across Different Discount Levels,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21 (3), 217–29.
6.
BrownAlexander L., CamererColin F., and LovalloDan (2013), “Estimating Structural Models of Equilibrium and Cognitive Hierarchy Thinking in the Field: The Case of Withheld Movie Critic Reviews,”Management Science, 59 (3), 733–47.
7.
CampbellMargaret C. and KirmaniAmna (2000), “Consumers’ Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (1), 69–83.
8.
ChaikenShelly (1980), “Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (5), 752–66.
9.
ChaikenShelly and MaheswaranDurairaj (1994), “Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing: Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgment,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66 (3), 460–73.
10.
ChuPai-Cheng and SpiresEric E. (2001), “Does Time Constraint on Users Negate the Efficacy of Decision Support Systems?”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85 (2), 226–49.
DarkePeter R. and RitchieRobin J. B. (2007), “The Defensive Consumer: Advertising Deception, Defensive Processing, and Distrust,”Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (February), 114–27.
13.
DeanDwane Hal and BiswasAbhijit (2001), “Third-Party Organization Endorsement of Products: An Advertising Cue Affecting Consumer Prepurchase Evaluation of Goods and Services,”Journal of Advertising, 30 (4), 41–57.
14.
DehaeneStanislas and MehlerJacques (1992), “Cross-Linguistic Regularities in the Frequency of Number Words,”Cognition, 43 (1), 1–29.
15.
DijksterhuisAp, SmithPamela K., Van BaarenRick B., and WigboldusDaniël H.J. (2005), “The Unconscious Consumer: Effects of Environment on Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15 (3), 193–202.
16.
Ein-GarDanit, ShivBaba, and TormalaZakary L. (2012), “When Blemishing Leads to Blossoming: The Positive Effect of Negative Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (5), 846–59.
17.
FazioRussell H (1990), “A Practical Guide to the Use of Response Latency in Social Psychological Research,” in Research Methods in Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 11, HendrickC.A. and ClarkM.S., eds. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
18.
FriestadMarian and WrightPeter (1994), “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts,”Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (1), 1–31.
19.
GilbertDaniel T., TafarodiRomin W., and MalonePatrick S. (1993), “You Can't Not Believe Everything You Read,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (2), 221–33.
20.
GoldsmithKelly and AmirOn (2010), “Can Uncertainty Improve Promotions?”Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (December), 1070–77.
21.
GriceH. Paul (1975), “Logic and Conversation,” in Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts, Vol. 3, ColePeter and MorganJerry L., eds. New York: Academic Press.
22.
GriceH. Paul (1978), “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation,” in Syntax and Semantics: Pragmatics, Vol. 9, ColePeter, ed. New York: Academic Press.
23.
GriffithAmanda and RaskKevin (2007), “The Influence of the U.S. News and World Report Collegiate Rankings on the Matriculation Decision of High-Ability Students: 1995–2004,”Economics of Education Review, 26 (2), 244–55.
24.
GuptaSunil and CooperLee G. (1992), “The Discounting of Discounts and Promotion Thresholds,”Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (3), 401–11.
25.
HardestyDavid M., BeardenWilliam O., and CarlsonJay P. (2007), “Persuasion Knowledge and Consumer Reactions to Pricing Tactics,”Journal of Retailing, 83 (2), 199–210.
26.
HiltonDenis J. (1995), “The Social Context of Reasoning: Conversational Inference and Rational Judgment,”Psychological Bulletin, 118 (2), 248–71.
27.
HoConnie Suk-Han and ChengFanny Sim-Fong (1997), “Training in Place-Value Concepts Improves Children's Addition Skills,”Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22 (4), 495–506.
28.
IsaacMathew S. and SchindlerRobert M. (2014), “The Top-Ten Effect: Consumers’ Subjective Categorization of Ranked Lists,”Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (6), 1181–202.
29.
Isaac, Mathew S., Yantao Wang, and Robert M. Schindler (2016), “The Round Number Advantage in Consumer Debt Payoff,” working paper, Seattle University.
30.
JansenCarel J.M. and PollmannMathijs M.W. (2001), “On Round Numbers: Pragmatic Aspects of Numerical Expressions,”Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 8 (3), 187–201.
31.
JohnLeslie K., BaraszKate, and NortonMichael I. (2015), “What Hiding Reveals: Ironic Effects of Withholding Information,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113 (4), 954–59.
32.
KahnemanDaniel (2003), “Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics,”American Economic Review, 93 (5), 1449–75.
33.
KirmaniAmna and ZhuRui (2007), “Vigilant Against Manipulation: The Effect of Regulatory Focus on the Use of Persuasion Knowledge,”Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (November), 688–701.
34.
LeclercFrance, HseeChristopher K., and NunesJoseph C. (2005), “Narrow Focusing: Why the Relative Position of a Good in Its Category Matters More Than It Should,”Marketing Science, 24 (2), 194–205.
35.
LeeLeonard, AmirOn, and ArielyDan (2009), “In Search of Homo Economicus: Cognitive Noise and the Role of Emotion in Preference Consistency,”Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (2), 173–87.
36.
LicataJane W., BiswasAbhijit, and KrishnanBalaji C. (1998), “Ambiguity and Exaggeration in Price Promotion: Perceptions of the Elder and Nonelder Consumer,”Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32 (1), 56–81.
37.
LucaMichael and SmithJonathan (2013), “Salience in Quality Disclosure: Evidence from the US News College Rankings,”Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 22 (1), 58–77.
38.
LucaMichael and SmithJonathan (2015), “Strategic Disclosure: The Case of Business School Rankings,”Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 112 (April), 17–25.
39.
MeredithMarc (2004), “Why Do Universities Compete in the Ratings Game? An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of the U.S. News and World Report College Rankings,”Research in Higher Education, 45 (5), 443–61.
40.
MeyerWulf-Uwe, NiperlMichael, RudolphUdo, and SchützwohlAchim (1991), “An Experimental Analysis of Surprise,”Cognition and Emotion, 5 (4), 295–311.
41.
MillerElizabeth G. and KahnBarbara E. (2005), “Shades of Meaning: The Effect of Color and Flavor Names on Consumer Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (1), 86–92.
42.
MobleyMary F., BeardenWilliam O., and TeelJesse E. (1988), “An Investigation of Individual Responses to Tensile Price Claims,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 273–79.
43.
PettyRichard E., CacioppoJohn T., and SchumannDavid (1983), “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement,”Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (2), 135–46.
44.
PettyRichard E., FlemingMonique A., PriesterJoseph R., and FeinsteinAmy Harasty (2001), “Individual Versus Group Interest Violation: Surprise as a Determinant of Argument Scrutiny and Persuasion,”Social Cognition, 19 (4), 418–42.
45.
PopeDevin G. (2009), “Reacting to Rankings: Evidence from ‘America's Best Hospitals’,”Journal of Health Economics, 28 (6), 1154–65.
46.
SchwarzNorbert (1996), Cognition and Communication: Judgmental Biases, Research Methods and the Logic of Conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47.
ShivBaba and FedorikhinAlexander (1999), “Heart and Mind in Conflict: The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making,”Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (3), 278–92.
48.
SieglerRobert S. and RobinsonMitchell (1982), “The Development of Numerical Understanding,” in Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol. 16, ReeseH.W. and LipsittL.P., eds. New York: Academic Press.
49.
SigurdBengt (1988), “Round Numbers,”Language in Society, 17 (2), 243–52.
50.
SperberDan and WilsonDierdre (1986), Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
51.
WardAndrew and BrennerLyle (2006), “Accentuate the Negative the Positive Effects of Negative Acknowledgment,”Psychological Science, 17 (11), 959–62.
52.
WilsonTimothy D. and GilbertDaniel T. (2008), “Explaining Away: A Model of Affective Adaptation,”Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3 (5), 370–86.
53.
WilsonTimothy D. and SchoolerJonathan W. (1991), “Thinking Too Much: Introspection Can Reduce the Quality of Preferences and Decisions,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 (2), 181–92.
54.
YoshidaHajime and KuriyamaKazuhiro (1986), “The Numbers 1 to 5 in the Development of Children's Number Concepts,”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41 (2), 251–66.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
