Does the number of people with whom someone communicates influence what he or she discusses and shares? Six studies demonstrate that compared with narrowcasting (i.e., communicating with just one person), broadcasting (i.e., communicating with multiple people) leads consumers to avoid sharing content that makes them look bad. Narrowcasting, however, encourages people to share content that is useful to the message recipient. These effects are driven by communicators’ focus of attention. People naturally tend to focus on the self, but communicating with just one person heightens other-focus, which leads communicators to share less self-presenting content and more useful content. These findings shed light on the drivers of word of mouth and provide insight into when the communication sender (vs. receiver) plays a relatively larger role in what people share.
AlickeMark D., and GovorunOlesya (2005), “The Better-Than-Average Effect,” in The Self in Social Judgment, MarkD. Alicke, DunningDavid A., and KruegerJoachim I., eds. New York: Psychology Press, 85–106.
2.
AlickeMark D., KlotzM.L., BreitenbecherDavid L., YurakTricia, and VredenburgDebbie S. (1995), “Personal Contact, Individuation, and the Better-Than-Average Effect,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 804–825.
3.
ApperlyIan A., RiggsKevin J., SimpsonAndrew, ChiavarinoClaudia, and SamsonDana (2006), “Is Belief Reasoning Automatic?”Psychological Science, 17(10), 841–44.
4.
ArkinRobert (1981), “Self-Presentation Styles,” in Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research, TedeschiJ.T., ed. New York: Academic Press, 311–34.
5.
BalesRobert F. (1951), Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups.Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
BaumeisterRoy F., BratslavskyEllen, FinkenauerCatrin, and VohsKathleen D. (2001), “Bad Is Stronger Than Good,”Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–70.
7.
BellPaul A. (1978), “Affective State, Attraction, and Affiliation: Misery Loves Happy Company, Too,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(4), 616–19.
8.
BergerJonah (2011), “Arousal Increases Social Transmission of Information,”Psychological Science, 22(7), 891–93.
9.
BergerJonah (2013), Contagious: Why Things Catch On.New York: Simon & Schuster.
10.
BergerJonah, and IyengarRaghuram (2013), “Communication Channels and Word of Mouth: How the Medium Shapes the Message,”Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 567–79.
11.
BergerJonah, and MilkmanKatherine (2012), “What Makes Online Content Viral?”Journal of Marketing, 49(March), 192–205.
12.
BergerJonah, and SchwartzEric (2011), “What Drives Immediate and Ongoing Word of Mouth?”Journal of Marketing Research, 48(October), 869–80.
13.
BrooksAlison Wood, and SchweitzerMaurice E. (2011), “Can Nervous Nelly Negotiate? How Anxiety Causes Negotiators to Make Low First Offers, Exit Early, and Earn Less Profit,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(1), 43–54.
14.
BrownJacqueline Johnson, and ReingenPeter H. (1987), “Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 350–62.
15.
BrownJonathon D., CollinsRebecca L., and SchmidtGreg W. (1988), “Self-Esteem and Direct Versus Indirect Forms of Self-Enhancement,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(3), 445–53.
16.
BuffardiLaura E., and Keith CampbellW. (2008), “Narcissism and Social Networking Web Sites,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10), 1303–1314.
17.
CarverCharles S., and ScheierMichael F. (1978), “Self-Focusing Effects of Dispositional Self-Consciousness, Mirror Presence, and Audience Presence,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(3), 324–32.
18.
ChambersJohn R., and WindschitlPaul D. (2004), “Biases in Social Comparative Judgments: The Role of Nonmotivated Factors in Above-Average and Comparative-Optimism Effects,”Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 813–38.
19.
CheemaAmar, and KaikatiAndrew M. (2010), “The Effect of Need for Uniqueness on Word of Mouth,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47(June), 553–63.
20.
ChenZoey, and BergerJonah (2013), “When, Why, and How Controversy Causes Conversation,”Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 580–93.
21.
ChevalierJudith A., and MayzlinDina (2006), “The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews,”Journal of Marketing Research, 43(August), 345–54.
22.
ChiouWen-Bin, and LeeChun-Chia (2013), “Enactment of One-to-Many Communication May Induce Self-Focused Attention That Leads to Diminished Perspective Taking: The Case of Facebook,”Judgment and Decision Making, 8(3), 372–80.
23.
ChiuYi, ChiouJin-Chern, FangWeileun, LinYung-Jiun, and WuMingching (2007), “Design, Fabrication, and Control of Components in MEMS-Based Optical Pickups,”IEEE Transactions in Magnetics, 43(2), 780–85.
24.
ChouHui-Tzu Grace, and EdgeNicholas (2012), “‘They Are Happier and Having Better Lives Than I Am’: The Impact of Using Facebook on Perceptions of Others’ Lives,”Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 117–21.
25.
CialdiniRobert B., BordenRichard J., ThorneAvril, WalkerMarchus Randall, FreemanStephen, and SloanLloyd Reynolds (1976), “Basking in Reflected Glory: Three (Football) Field Studies,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3), 366–75.
26.
ClarkHerbert H., and SchaeferEdward F. (1989), “Contributing to Discourse,”Cognitive Science, 13(2), 259–94.
27.
CorfmanKim P. (1995), “The Importance of Member Homogeneity to Focus Group Quality,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 22, FrankR. Kardes, and SujanMita, eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 354–59.
28.
DavisDeborah, and BrockTimothy C. (1975), “Use of First Person Pronouns as a Function of Increased Objective Self-Awareness and Performance Feedback,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(4), 381–88.
29.
De AngelisMatteo, BonezziAndrea, PelusoAlessandro, RuckerDerek, and CostabileMichele (2012), “On Braggarts and Gossips: A Self-Enhancement Account of Word-of-Mouth Generation and Transmission,”Journal of Marketing Research, 49(August), 551–63.
30.
DichterE. (1966), “How Word of Mouth Advertising Works,”Harvard Business Review, 44(November/December), 147–66.
31.
DuboisDavid, BonezziAndrea, and De AngelisMatteo (2013), “The Dangers of Strong Ties: How Interpersonal Closeness Influences Word-of-Mouth Valence,” working paper, INSEAD.
DunningDavid, BovenLeaf Van, and LoewensteinGeorge (2001), “Egocentric Empathy Gaps in Social Interaction and Exchange,” in Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 18, Edward LawlerMichael, MaceyW., ThyeShane R., and WalkerHenry A., eds. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 65–97.
34.
EmlerNick (1990), “A Social Psychology of Reputation,”European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 171–93.
35.
EngelJames F., BlackwellRoger D., and KegerreisRobert J. (1969), “How Information Is Used to Adopt an Innovation,”Journal of Advertising Research, 9(4), 3–8.
36.
EpleyNicholas, KeysarBoaz, BovenLeaf Van, and GilovichThomas (2004), “Perspective Taking as Egocentric Anchoring and Adjustment,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 327–39.
37.
FenigsteinAllan, and AbramsDominic (1993), “Self-Attention and the Egocentric Assumption of Shared Perspectives,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29(4), 287–303.
38.
FiskeSusan T. (2001), “Social and Societal Pragmatism: Commentary on Augustinos, Gaskell, and Lorenzi-Cioldi,” in Representations of the Social: Bridging Research Traditions, DeauxKay, and PhilogeneGina, eds. New York: Blackwell, 249–53.
39.
FrenzenJonathan, and NakamotoKent (1993), “Structure, Cooperation, and the Flow of Market Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 360–75.
40.
GilovichThomas, MedvecVictoria Husted, and SavitskyKenneth (2000), “The Spotlight Effect in Social Judgment: An Egocentric Bias in Estimates of the Salience of One's Own Actions and Appearance,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 211–22.
41.
GoffmanErving (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.New York: Anchor.
42.
GonzalesAmy L., and HancockJeffrey T. (2011), “Mirror, Mirror on My Facebook Wall: Effects of Exposure to Facebook on Self-Esteem,”Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(1), 79–83.
43.
GranovetterMark S. (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties,”American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–80.
44.
GriceH. Paul (1975), “Logic and Conversation,” in Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, ColePeter, and MorganJerry L., eds. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.
45.
HamiltonDavid L., and ShermanSteven J., (1996), “Perceiving Persons and Groups,”Psychological Review, 103(2), 336–55.
46.
HastieReid, and ParkBernadette (1986), “The Relationship Between Memory and Judgment Depends on Whether the Judgment Task Is Memory-Based or On-Line,”Psychological Review, 93(3), 258–68.
47.
HayesAndrew F., PreacherKris J., and MyersTeresa A. (2011), “Mediation and the Estimation of Indirect Effects in Political Communication Research,” in The Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques, BucyE.P., and Lance HolbertR., eds. New York: Routledge, 434–65.
48.
Hennig-ThurauThorsten, GwinnerKevin P., WalshGianfranco, and GremlerDwayne D. (2004), “Electronic Word-of-Mouth via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet?”Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52.
49.
HigginsE. Tory (1999), “‘Saying Is Believing’ Effects: When Sharing Reality About Something Biases Knowledge and Evaluations,” in Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge, LeighL. Thompson, LevineJohn M., and MessickDavid M., eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 33–49.
50.
HoorensVera (1996), “Self-Favoring Biases for Positive and Negative Characteristics: Independent Phenomena?”Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 53–67.
51.
IckesWilliam, ReidheadSusan, and PattersonMiles (1986), “Machiavellianism and Self-Monitoring: As Different as ‘Me’ and ‘You,’”Social Cognition, 4(1), 58–74.
52.
IyengarRaghuram, Van den BulteChristophe, and ValenteThomas W. (2011), “Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion,”Marketing Science, 30(2), 195–212.
53.
JenniKaren, and LoewensteinGeorge (1997), “Explaining the Identifiable Victim Effect,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(3), 235–57.
54.
KellyKristine M., and JonesWarren H. (1997), “Assessment of Dispositional Embarrassability,”Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 10(4), 307–333.
55.
KleinWilliam M. (1992), “Constructing Social Reality: Greater Bias for Negative Than for Positive Behaviors?” paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association (Boston).
56.
KrugerJustin (1999), “Lake Wobegon Be Gone! The ‘Below-Average Effect’ and the Egocentric Nature of Comparative Ability Judgments,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 221–32.
57.
LandisM.H., and BurttHarold E. (1924), “A Study of Conversations,”Journal of Comparative Psychology, 4(1), 81–89.
58.
LataneBibb (1981), “The Psychology of Social Impact,”American Psychologist, 36(4), 343–56.
59.
LeRougeDavy, and WarlopLuk (2006), “Why It Is So Hard to Predict Our Partner's Product Preferences: The Effect of Target Familiarity on Prediction Accuracy,”Journal of Consumer Research, 33(3), 393–402.
60.
LockeKenneth D., and HorowitzLeonard M. (1990), “Satisfaction in Interpersonal Interactions as a Function of Similarity in Level of Dysphoria,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 823–31.
61.
McGuireWilliam J. (1985), “Attitudes and Attitude Change,” in The Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd ed., LindzeyG., and AronsonE., eds. New York: Random House, 233–46.
62.
MoldovanSarit, GoldenbergJacob, and ChattopadhyayAmitava (2011), “The Different Roles of Product Originality and Usefulness in Generating Word of Mouth,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(2), 109–119.
63.
MooreSarah (2012), “Some Things Are Better Left Unsaid: How Word of Mouth Influences the Storyteller,”Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1140–54.
64.
MorNilly, and WinquistJennifer (2002), “Self-Focused Attention and Negative Affect: A Meta-Analysis,”Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 638–62.
65.
MullenBrian (1983), “Operationalizing the Effect of the Group on the Individual: A Self-Attention Perspective,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(4), 295–322.
66.
NaamanMor, BoaseJeffrey, and LaiChih-Hui (2010), “Is It Really About Me? Message Content in Social Awareness Streams,” in Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.Savannah, GA: Association for Computing Machinery, 189–92.
67.
PackardGrant, and WootenDavid B. (2013), “Compensatory Knowledge Signaling in Consumer Word-of-Mouth,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 434–50.
68.
PaulhusDelroy L., GrafPeter, and SelstMark Van (1989), “Attentional Load Increases the Positivity of Self-Presentation,”Social Cognition, 7(4), 389–400.
69.
PaulhusDelroy L., and LevittKaren (1987), “Desirable Responding Triggered by Affect: Automatic Egotism?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(2), 245–59.
70.
PennebakerJames W., FrancisMartha E., and BoothRoger J. (2001), Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC 2001.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
71.
PiagetJean (1926), The Language and Thought of the Child.London: Routledge & Regan Paul.
72.
PylyshynZenon W. (1978), “When Is Attribution of Beliefs Justified?”Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 592–93.
73.
RatnerRebecca K., and KahnBarbara E. (2002), “The Impact of Private Versus Public Consumption on Variety-Seeking Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 246–57.
74.
RichinsMarsha L. (1984), “Word of Mouth Communications as Negative Information,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11, ThomasC. Kinnear, ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 697–702.
75.
RossMichael, and SicolyFiore (1979), “Egocentric Biases in Availability and Attribution,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 322–36.
76.
SchauHope Jensen, and GillyMary C. (2003), “We Are What We Post? Self-Presentation in Personal Web Space,”Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 385–404.
77.
SchlosserAnn E. (2005), “Posting Versus Lurking: Communicating in a Multiple Audience Context,”Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 260–65.
78.
SedikidesConstantine (1993), “Assessment, Enhancement, and Verification Determinants of the Self-Evaluation Process,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 317–38.
79.
SedikidesConstantine, and StrubeMichael J. (1995), “The Multiply Motivated Self,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(12), 1330–35.
80.
SlovicPaul (2007), “‘If I Look at the Mass I Will Never Act’: Psychic Numbing and Genocide,”Judgment and Decision Making, 2(2), 79–95.
81.
SmithRobert W., FaroDavid, and BursonKatherine A. (2013), “More for the Many: The Influence of Entitativity on Charitable Giving,”Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 961–76.
82.
SundaramD.S., MitraKaushik, and WebsterCynthia (1998), “Word-of-Mouth Communications: A Motivational Analysis,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 25, JosephW. Alba, and Wesley HutchinsonJ., eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 527–31.
83.
TamirDiana I., and MitchellJason P. (2012), “Disclosing Information About the Self Is Intrinsically Rewarding,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(21), 8038–43.
84.
TausczikYla R., and PennebakerJames W. (2010), “The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods,”Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54.
85.
TaylorShelley E., and ThompsonSuzanne C. (1982), “Stalking the Elusive ‘Vividness’ Effect,”Psychological Review, 89(2), 155–81.
86.
TiceDianne M. (1991), “Esteem Protection or Enhancement? Self-Handicapping Motives and Attributions Differ by Trait Self-Esteem,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 711–25.
87.
ToubiaOlivier, and StephenAndrew T. (2013), “Intrinsic vs. Image-Related Utility in Social Media: Why Do People Contribute Content to Twitter?”Marketing Science, 32(3), 368–92.
88.
TrommsdorffGisela, and JohnHelga (1992), “Decoding Affective Communication in Intimate Relationships,”European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(1), 41–54.
89.
TrusovMichael, BucklinRandolph E., and PauwelsKoen (2009), “Effects of Word-of-Mouth Versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site,”Journal of Marketing, 73(September), 90–102.
90.
Van den BulteChristophe, and WuytsStefan (2009), “Leveraging Customer Networks,” in The Network Challenge: Strategy, Profit and Risk in an Interlinked World, WindJerry (Yoram), and KleindorferPaul R., eds. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing, 243–58.
91.
WaltherJoseph B. (2007), “Selective Self-Presentation in Computer-Mediated Communication: Hyperpersonal Dimensions of Technology, Language, and Cognition,”Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2538–57.
92.
WeberErnst H. (1834), De Pulsu, Resorptione, Auditu et Tactu.Leipzig, Germany: Koehler.
93.
WegnerDaniel M., and GiulianoTony (1980), “Arousal-Induced Attention to Self,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(5), 719–26.
94.
WeinsteinNeil D. (1983), “Reducing Unrealistic Optimism About Illness Susceptibility,”Health Psychology, 2(1), 11–20.
95.
WellmanHenry M. (1988), “First Steps in the Child's Theorizing About the Mind,” in Developing Theories of Mind, JanetW. Astington, HarrisPaul L., and OlsonDavid R., eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 64–92.
96.
WojnickiAndrea C., and GodesDavid (2011), “Word-of-Mouth as Self-Enhancement,” HBS Marketing Research Paper No. 06-01, Harvard Business School, Harvard University.
97.
ZhangYan, and EpleyNicholas (2012), “Exaggerated, Mispredicted, and Misplaced: When ‘It's the Thought That Counts’ in Gift Exchanges,”Journal of Experimental Psychology, 141(4), 667–81.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
