This article describes several field and laboratory experiments that investigate an identity congruency effect on donations. Experiment 1 is a field experiment showing that consumers give more money to a public radio station if they are told that a previous donor who shares their identity also made a large contribution. This effect is more likely to occur when consumers have high collective-identity esteem (measured in Experiment 2a) and when attention is focused on others (manipulated in Experiment 2b). The authors measure these two moderators simultaneously and observe and replicate a three-way interaction. Again, the identity congruency effect is the strongest when consumers have high collective-identity esteem and when attention is focused on others (Experiment 3a and Experiment 3b). These results provide a novel understanding of the causes of the identity congruency effect on donations. The authors conclude with a discussion of the theoretical and substantive implications of these findings.
AakerJennifer L., and LeeAngela Y., (2001), “‘I’ Seek Pleasures and ‘We’ Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion,”Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 33–49.
2.
AikenLeona S., and WestStephen G., (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
3.
AmaldossWilfred, and JainSanjay, (2005), “Pricing of Conspicuous Goods: A Competitive Analysis of Social Effects,”Journal of Marketing Research, 41(February), 30–42.
4.
American Association of Fundraising Counsel (2005), Giving USA.Glenview, IL: American Association of Fundraising Counsel.
5.
AronArthur, AronElaine N., and SmollanDanny, (1992), “Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the Structure of Interpersonal Closeness,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612.
6.
BemSandra, L., (1981), “Gender Schema Theory: A Cognitive Account of Sex Typing,”Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–64.
7.
BoltonLisa E., and ReedAmericusII, (2004), “Sticky Priors and Identification-Based Judgments,”Journal of Marketing Research, 41(November), 397–410.
8.
BontempoRobert, and RiveroJ.C., (1992), “Cultural Variation in Cognition: The Role of Self-Concept in the Attitude Behavior Link,” paper presented at the meeting of the American Academy of Management, Las Vegas (August 8–13).
9.
BurnkrantRobert, and CousineauAlain, (1975), “Informational and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 2(3), 206–215.
CohenJoel, (2005), “Seeing If,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24(Fall), 181–82.
12.
CohenJoel, and GoldenEllen, (1972), “Informational Social Influence and Product Evaluation,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(1), 54–59.
13.
DeauxKay, ReidAnne, MizrahiKim, and EthierKathleen A., (1995), “Parameters of Social Identity,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 280–91.
14.
DemarreeKenneth G., WheelerChristian S., and PettyRichard E., (2005), “Priming a New Identity: Self-Monitoring Moderates the Effects of Nonself Primes on Self-Judgments and Behavior,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 657–71.
15.
EiserRichard J., and SabineP., (2001), “Optimism, Pessimism, and the Direction of Self-Other Comparisons,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(1), 77–84.
16.
FeldmanJack M., and LynchJohn G., (1988), “Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421–35.
17.
ForehandMark R., and DeshpandéRohit, (2001), “What We See Makes Us Who We Are: Priming Ethnic Self-Awareness and Advertising Response,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38(August), 335–48.
18.
ForehandMark R., DeshpandéRohit, and ReedAmericusII, (2002), “Identity Salience and the Influence of Differential Activation of the Social Self-Schema on Advertising Response,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1086–1099.
19.
FrableDeborrah, E., (1989), “Sex Typing and Gender Ideology: Two Facets of the Individual's Gender Psychology That Go Together,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 95–108.
LuhtanenRiia K., and CrockerJennifer, (1992), “A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-Evaluation of One's Social Identity,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302–318.
22.
MandelNaomi, (2003), “Shifting Selves and Decision Making: The Effects of Self-Construal Priming on Consumer Risk-Taking,”Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 30–40.
23.
MarkusHazel, and NuriusPaula, (1986), “Possible Selves,”American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–69.
24.
MillerJoan, G., (1994), “Cultural Diversity in the Morality of Caring: Individual Oriented Versus Duty-Based Interpersonal Moral Codes,”Cross Cultural Research, 28(1), 3–39.
25.
MussweilerThomas, RuterKatja, and EpstudeKai, (2004), “The Ups and Downs of Social Comparison: Mechanisms of Assimilation and Contrast,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 832–44.
26.
NelsonMichelle R., ShavittSharon, SchunnumAngela, and BarkmeierJacqueline, (1997), “Prediction of Long-Term Advertising Effectiveness: New Cognitive Response Approaches,” in Measuring Advertising Effectiveness: Advertising and Consumer Psychology, WellsWilliam D., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 133–55.
27.
ReedAmericusII, (2004), “Activating the Self-Importance of Consumer Selves: Exploring Identity Salience Effects on Judgments,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 286–95.
28.
ReedAmericusII, and ForehandMark, (2007), “Managing Social Identity: Strategies for Creating Brand Identification and Community,” working paper, the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
29.
ReingenPeter, H., (1982), “Test of a List Procedure for Inducing Compliance with a Request to Donate Money,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(1), 110–18.
30.
SalamonLester, M., (2002), The State of Nonprofit America.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
31.
SchmittBernd H., LeclercFrance, and Dube-RiouxLaurette, (1988), “Sex Typing and Consumer Behavior: A Test of Gender Schema Theory,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15(1), 122–28.
32.
ShangJen, and CrosonRachel, (2005), “Field Experiments in Charitable Contribution: The Impact of Social Influence on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods,” working paper, the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
33.
ShavittSharon, (1989), “Operationalizing Functional Theories of Attitude,” in Attitude Structure and Function, PratkanisAnthony R., BrecklerSteven J., and GreenwaldAnthony G., eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 331–37.
34.
ShavittSharon, (1990), “The Role of Attitude Objects in Attitude Functions,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26(2), 124–48.
35.
ShavittSharon, and NelsonMichelle R., (2000), “The Social-Identity Function in Person Perception: Communicated Meanings of Product Preferences,” in Why We Evaluate: Functions of Attitudes, MaioGregory R., and OlsonJames M., eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 37–57.
36.
SmithM. Brewster, BrunerJerome S., and WhiteRobert W., (1956), Opinions and Personality.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
37.
SpencerSteven J., ZannaMark P., and FongGeoffrey T., (2005), “Establishing a Causal Chain: Why Experiments Are Often More Effective Than Mediational Analyses in Examining Psychological Processes,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–51.
38.
StapelDiederik A., and KoomenWillem, (2000), “How Far Do We Go Beyond the Information Given? The Impact of Knowledge Activation on Interpretation and Inference,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 19–37.
39.
TroppLinda R., and WrightStephen C., (2001), “Ingroup Identification as the Inclusion of Ingroup in the Self,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 585–600.
40.
VisserPenny S., and MirabileRobert R., (2004), “Attitudes in the Social Context: The Impact of Social Network Composition on Individual-Level Attitude Strength,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 779–95.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
