Prior research shows that positive online reviews are less valued than negative reviews. The authors argue that this is due to differences in causal attributions for positive versus negative information such that positive reviews tend to be relatively more attributed to the reviewer (vs. product experience) than negative reviews. The presence of temporal contiguity cues, which indicate that review writing closely follows consumption, reduces the relative extent to which positive reviews are attributed to the reviewer and mitigates the negativity bias. An examination of 65,531 Yelp.com restaurant reviews shows that review value is negatively related to review valence but that this negative relationship is absent for reviews that contain temporal contiguity cues. A series of lab studies replicates these findings and suggests that temporal contiguity cues enhance the value of a positive review and increase the likelihood of choosing a product with a positive review by changing reader beliefs about the cause of the review.
AlbertA., and AndersonJ.A. (1984), “On the Existence of Maximum Likelihood Estimates in Logistic Regression Models,”Biometrika, 71 (1), 1–10.
2.
AmabileTeresa M., and AnnH. Glazebrook (1982), “A Negativity Bias in Interpersonal Evaluation,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18 (1), 1–22.
3.
AndersonJohn R. (1995), The Architecture of Cognition.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
AngelisMatteo, BonezziAndrea, PelusoAlessandro, RuckerDerek, and CostabileMichele (2012), “On Braggarts and Gossips: A Self-Enhancement Account of Word-of-Mouth Generation and Transmission,”Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (August), 551–63.
5.
BaSulin, and PaulA. Pavlou (2002), “Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior,”MIS Quarterly, 26 (3), 243–68.
6.
BasuroySuman, ChatterjeeSubimal, and Abraham RavidS. (2003), “How Critical Are Critical Reviews? The Box Office Effects of Film Critics, Star Power, and Budgets,”Journal of Marketing, 67 (October), 103–117.
7.
BaumeisterRoy F., BratslavskyEllen, FinkenauerCatrin, and KathleenD. Vohs (2001), “Bad Is Stronger Than Good,”Review of General Psychology, 5 (4), 323–70.
8.
BelsleyDavid A., KuhEdwin, and RoyE. Welsch (1980), Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
9.
BergerJonah, and EricM. Schwartz (2011), “What Drives Immediate and Ongoing Word of Mouth?”Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (October), 869–80.
10.
BondCharles F., and EvanL. Anderson (1987), “The Reluctance to Transmit Bad News: Private Discomfort or Public Display?”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23 (2), 176–87.
11.
BuehnerMarc J., and MayJon (2003), “Rethinking Temporal Contiguity and the Judgement of Causality: Effects of Prior Knowledge, Experience, and Reinforcement Procedure,”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56 (5), 865–90.
12.
BullockMerry, GelmanRochel, and BaillargeonRenée (1982), “The Development of Causal Reasoning,” in The Developmental Psychology of Time, WilliamJ. Friedman, ed. New York: Academic Press, 209–254.
13.
CheemaAmar, and AndrewM. Kaikati (2010), “The Effect of Need for Uniqueness on Word of Mouth,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (June), 553–63.
14.
ChevalierJudith A., and MayzlinDina (2006), “The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews,”Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (August), 345–54.
15.
CohenJacob (1960), “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales,”Educational Psychological Measurement, 20 (1), 37–46.
ElliottAlan C., and WayneA. Woodward (2007), Statistical Analysis Quick Reference Guidebook: With SPSS Examples.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
21.
EpleyNicholas, KeysarBoaz, Van BovenLeaf, and GilovichThomas (2004), “Perspective Taking as Egocentric Anchoring and Adjustment,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 (3), 327–39.
22.
FeldmanJack M., and JohnG. LynchJr. (1988), “Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 (3), 421–35.
23.
FeldmanRobert H.L. (1984), “The Influence of Communicator Characteristics on the Nutrition Attitudes and Behavior of High School Students,”Journal of School Health, 54 (4), 149–51.
24.
FiskeSusan T. (1980), “Attention and Weight in Person Perception: The Impact of Negative and Extreme Behavior,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38 (6), 889–906.
25.
FolkesValerie S. (1988), “Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions,”Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (4), 548–65.
26.
FowlerGeoffrey, and De AvilaJoseph (2009), “On the Internet, Everyone's a Critic but They're Not Very Critical,”The Wall Street Journal, (accessed October 4, 2011), [available at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125470172872063071.html].
27.
FrankMark G., and GilovichThomas (1989), “Effect of Memory Perspective on Retrospective Causal Attributions,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (3), 399–403.
28.
FriestadMarian, and WrightPeter (1994), “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts,”Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (1), 1–31.
29.
GilbertDaniel T., and PatrickS. Malone (1995), “The Correspondence Bias,”Psychological Bulletin, 117 (1), 21–38.
30.
GodesDavid, and MayzlinDina (2004), “Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication,”Marketing Science, 24 (4), 545–60.
31.
GreeneWilliam H. (2008), Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice-Hall.
GriceH.P. (1975), “Logic and Conversation,” in Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3: Speech Acts, ColePeter, and JerryL. Morgan, eds. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.
34.
HayesAndrew F. (2012), “Process: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling,” white paper, (accessed April 25, 2013), [available at http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf].
35.
HeiderFritz, and SimmelMarianne (1944), “An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior,”American Journal of Psychology, 57 (2), 243–59.
36.
HerrPaul M., FrankR. Kardes, and KimJohn (1991), “Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective,”Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (4), 454–62.
37.
HouserDaniel, and WoodersJohn (2006), “Reputation in Auctions: Theory, and Evidence from eBay,”Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 15 (2), 353–69.
38.
IsenAlice M., ThomasE. Nygren, and Gregory AshbyF. (1988), “Influence of Positive Affect on the Subjective Utility of Gains and Losses: It Is Just Not Worth the Risk,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55 (5), 710–17.
39.
IsenAlice M., and PatrickRobert (1983), “The Effect of Positive Feelings on Risk Taking: When the Chips Are Down,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31 (2), 194–202.
40.
JonesEdward E., KennethJ. Gergen, and RobertE. Jones (1963), “Tactics of Ingratiation Among Leaders and Subordinates in a Status Hierarchy,”Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 77 (3), 1–20.
41.
KaminsMichael A., ValerieS. Folkes, and PernerLars (1997), “Consumer Responses to Rumors: Good News, Bad News,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6 (2), 165–87.
42.
KanouseDavid E., and Reid HansonL. (1972), “Negativity in Evaluation,” in Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior, EdwardE. Jones, eds. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 47–62.
KummerHans (1995), “Causal Knowledge in Animals,” in Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate, Symposia of the Fyssen Foundation, SperberDan, PremackDavid, and PremackAnn, eds. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 26–39.
47.
LiuYong (2006), “Word of Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenue,”Journal of Marketing, 70 (July), 74–89.
48.
ManisMelvin S., CornellDouglas, and JeffreyC. Moore (1974), “Transmission of Attitude Relevant Information Through a Communication Chain,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30 (1), 81–94.
49.
MichotteAlbert (1963), The Perception of Causality.New York: Basic Books.
MizerskiRichard W. (1982), “An Attribution Explanation of the Disproportionate Influence of Unfavorable Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (3), 301–310.
52.
MooreSarah (2012), “Some Things Are Better Left Unsaid: How Word of Mouth Influences the Storyteller,”Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (6), 1140–54.
53.
NickersonRaymond S. (1999), “How We Know—and Sometimes Misjudge—What Others Know: Imputing One's Own Knowledge to Others,”Psychological Bulletin, 125 (6), 737–59.
54.
NiederhofferKate G., and JamesW. Pennebaker (2009), “Sharing One's Story: On the Benefits of Writing or Talking About Emotional Experience,” in Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology, 2d edition SnyderC.R., and ShaneJ. Lopez, eds. New York: Oxford University Press, 621–32.
PeetersGuido, and CzapinskiJanusz (1990), “Positive–Negative Asymmetry in Evaluations: The Distinction Between Affective and Informational Negativity Effects,”European Review of Social Psychology, 1 (1), 33–60.
57.
PreacherKristopher J., DerekD. Rucker, and AndrewF. Hayes (2007), “Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions,”Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42 (1), 185–227.
RozinPaul, and EdwardB. Royzman (2001), “Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion,”Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5 (4), 296–320.
60.
SchlosserAnn E. (2005), “Posting Versus Lurking: Communicating in a Multiple Audience Context,”Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (2), 260–65.
61.
SchlosserAnn E. (2011), “Can Including Pros and Cons Increase the Helpfulness and Persuasiveness of Online Reviews? The Interactive Effects of Ratings and Arguments,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21 (3), 226–39.
62.
SenShahana, and LermanDawn (2007), “Why Are You Telling Me This? An Examination into Negative Consumer Reviews on the Web,”Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21 (4), 76–94.
63.
ShanksDavid R., SusanM. Pearson, and DickinsonAnthony (1989), “Temporal Contiguity and the Judgment of Causality by Human Subjects,”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section B, 41 (2), 139–59.
SkowronskiJohn J., and DonalE. Carlston (1989), “Negativity and Extremity Biases in Impression Formation: A Review of Explanations,”Psychological Bulletin, 105 (1), 131–42.
66.
SperberDan, PremackDavid, and PremackAnn James eds. (1995), Causal Cognition.New York: Oxford University Press.
TaylorShelley E. (1991), “Asymmetrical Effects of Positive and Negative Events: The Mobilization–Minimization Hypothesis,”Psychological Bulletin, 110 (1), 67–85.
69.
TesserAbraham, and RosenSidney (1975), “The Reluctance to Transmit Bad News,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 8, BerkowitzLeonard, ed. New York: Academic Press, 193–232.
70.
ThibautJohn W., and HenryW. Riecken (1955), “Some Determinants and Consequences of the Perception of Social Causality,”Journal of Personality, 24 (2), 113–33.
71.
TirunillaiSeshadri, and TellisGerard (2012), “Does Chatter Really Matter? Dynamics of User-Generated Content and Stock Performance,”Marketing Science, 31 (2), 198–215.
72.
WangZhongmin (2010), “Anonymity, Social Image, and the Competition for Volunteers: A Case Study of the Online Market for Reviews,”B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 10 (1), 1–33.
WeissAllen M., NicholasH. Lurie, and DeborahJ. MacInnis (2008), “Listening to Strangers: Whose Responses Are Valuable, How Valuable Are They, and Why?”Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (August), 425–36.
75.
WhitePeter A. (1988), “Causal Processing: Origins and Development,”Psychological Bulletin, 104 (1), 36–52.
76.
WojnickiAndrea C., and DavidB. Godes (2013), “Signaling Success: Strategically Positive Word of Mouth,” working paper, University of Toronto.
77.
WrightPeter (1974), “The Harassed Decision Maker: Time Pressures, Distractions, and the Use of Evidence,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 59 (5), 555–61.
78.
ZhaoXinshu, JohnG. LynchJr., and ChenQimei (2010), “Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths About Mediation Analysis,”Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (2), 197–206.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
