Because negative reviews have the potential to dissuade consumers, brands necessarily worry about them. Prior literature generally supports the notion that negative information offers greater value to and influences consumers more powerfully, yet in specific circumstances, negative online reviews might be less helpful and influential. As the current research establishes, when negative reviews exhibit near (vs. far) temporal proximity cues, relative to a reviewed experience with a product or service, and some degree of negative emotionality, consumers tend to discount them in their decision-making. Such outcomes seemingly arise because consumers identify a negative review that combines near temporal proximity (i.e., posted or written in a way that makes the experience feel temporally close) with negative emotionality as a form of “venting.” They then ascribe the information in the negative review to reviewer-related attributes rather than to relevant product or service quality attributes. Consistent evidence for this venting discount effect emerges from analyses of actual hotel reviews from Tripadvisor as well as multiple experimental studies involving both products and services.
AlickeMark D.BraunJames C.GlorJeffrey E.KlotzMary L.MageeJonSederhoimHeatherSiegelRobin (1992), “Complaining Behavior in Social Interaction,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18 (3), 286–95.
2.
AllardThomasDunnLea H.WhiteKatherine (2020), “Negative Reviews, Positive Impact: Consumer Empathetic Responding to Unfair Word of Mouth,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (4), 86–108.
3.
Babić RosarioAnaDe ValckKristineSotgiuFrancesca (2020), “Conceptualizing the Electronic Word-of-Mouth Process: What We Know and Need to Know About eWOM Creation, Exposure, and Evaluation,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 422–48.
4.
BaraschAlixandraZaubermanGalDiehlKristin (2018), “How the Intention to Share Can Undermine Enjoyment: Photo-Taking Goals and Evaluation of Experiences,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (6), 1220–37.
5.
BaumeisterRoy F.BratslavskyEllenFinkenauerCatrinVohsKathleen D. (2001), “Bad Is Stronger Than Good,” Review of General Psychology, 5 (4), 323–70.
6.
BaumeisterRoy F.VohsKathleen D.DeWallNathan C.ZhangLiqing (2007), “How Emotion Shapes Behavior: Feedback, Anticipation, and Reflection, Rather Than Direct Causation,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11 (2), 167–203.
7.
BennettJ.C. (1991), “The Irrationality of the Catharsis Theory of Aggression as Justification for Educators’ Support of Interscholastic Football,” Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72 (2), 415–18.
8.
BergerJonah (2014), “Word of Mouth and Interpersonal Communication: A Review and Directions for Future Research,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (4), 586–607.
9.
BergerJonahMilkmanKatherine L. (2012), “What Makes Online Content Viral?” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (2), 192–205.
10.
BondCharles F.Jr.,AndersonEvan L. (1987), “The Reluctance to Transmit Bad News: Private Discomfort or Public Display?” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23 (2), 176–87.
11.
BuehnerMarc J.MayJon (2003), “Rethinking Temporal Contiguity and the Judgement of Causality: Effects of Prior Knowledge, Experience, and Reinforcement Procedure,” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 56 (5), 865–90.
12.
BushmanBrad J. (2002), “Does Venting Anger Feed or Extinguish the Flame? Catharsis, Rumination, Distraction, Anger, and Aggressive Responding,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28 (6), 724–31.
13.
BushmanBrad J.BaumeisterRoy F.StackAngela D. (1999), “Catharsis, Aggression, and Persuasive Influence: Self-Fulfilling or Self-Defeating Prophecies?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 (3), 367–76.
14.
CaoQingDuanWenjingGanQiwei (2011), “Exploring Determinants of Voting for the “Helpfulness” of Online User Reviews: A Text Mining Approach,” Decision Support Systems, 50 (2), 511–21.
15.
ChenZoeyLurieNicholas H. (2013), “Temporal Contiguity and Negativity Bias in the Impact of Online Word of Mouth,” Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (4), 463–76.
16.
ChevalierJudith A.MayzlinDina (2006), “The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (3), 345–54.
17.
DalebrouxAnneGoldsteinThalia R.WinnerEllen (2008), “Short-Term Mood Repair Through Art-Making: Positive Emotion Is More Effective Than Venting,” Motivation and Emotion, 32 (4), 288–95.
18.
EastRobertHammondKathyWrightMalcolm (2007), “The Relative Incidence of Positive and Negative Word of Mouth: A Multi-Category Study,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24 (2), 175–84.
EpleyNicholasKeysarBoazVan BovenLeafGilovichThomas (2004), “Perspective Taking as Egocentric Anchoring and Adjustment,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 (3), 327–39.
21.
FolkesValerie S. (1988), “Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (4), 548–65.
22.
FriestadMarianWrightPeter (1994), “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (1), 1–31.
23.
GentileDouglas A. (2013), “Catharsis and Media Violence: A Conceptual Analysis,” Societies, 3 (4), 491–510.
24.
GhoseAnindyaIpeirotisPanagiotis G. (2011), “Estimating the Helpfulness and Economic Impact of Product Reviews: Mining Text and Reviewer Characteristics,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23 (10), 1498–512.
25.
GollwitzerMarioDenzlerMarkus (2009), “What Makes Revenge Sweet: Seeing the Offender Suffer or Delivering a Message?” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (4), 840–44.
26.
GolmohammadiAlirezaHavakhorTahaGauriDinesh K.ComprixJoseph J. (2021), “Complaint Publicization in Social Media,” Journal of Marketing, 85 (6), 1–23.
27.
GrewalLaurenStephenAndrew T. (2019), “In Mobile We Trust: The Effects of Mobile Versus Non-Mobile Reviews on Consumer Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (5), 791–808.
28.
GrewalLaurenStephenAndrew T.ColemanNicole Verrochi (2019), “When Posting About Products on Social Media Backfires: The Negative Effects of Consumer Identity Signaling on Product Interest,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (2), 197–210.
29.
HayesAndrew F. (2017), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press.
30.
Hennig-ThurauThorstenGwinnerKevin P.WalshGianfrancoGremlerDwayne D. (2004), “Electronic Word-of-Mouth via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet?” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18 (1), 38–52.
31.
HerhausenDennisLudwigStephanGrewalDhruvWulfJochenSchoegelMarcus (2019), “Detecting, Preventing, and Mitigating Online Firestorms in Brand Communities,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (3), 1–21.
32.
HerrPaul M.KardesFrank R.KimJohn (1991), “Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (4), 454–62.
33.
HuttoClayton J.GilbertEric (2014), “VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text,” in Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
34.
HydockChrisChenZoeyCarlsonKurt (2020), “Why Unhappy Customers Are Unlikely to Share Their Opinions with Brands,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (6), 95–112.
35.
KährAndreaNyffeneggerBettinaKrohmerHarleyHoyerWayne D. (2016), “When Hostile Consumers Wreak Havoc on Your Brand: The Phenomenon of Consumer Brand Sabotage,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (3), 25–41.
36.
KimJunyongGuptaPranjal (2012), “Emotional Expressions in Online User Reviews: How They Influence Consumers’ Product Evaluations.,” Journal of Business Research, 65 (7), 985–92.
37.
KopelmanShirliRosetteAshleigh ShelbyThompsonLeigh (2006), “The Three Faces of Eve: Strategic Displays of Positive, Negative, and Neutral Emotions in Negotiations,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99 (1), 81–101.
38.
KowalskiRobin M. (1996), “Complaints and Complaining: Functions, Antecedents, and Consequences,” Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2), 179–96.
39.
KronrodAnnBartYakov (2024), “The Paradox of Word of Mouth: Do More Certain Transmitters Generate Less Certain Receivers?” working paper.
40.
KrossEthanAydukOzlem (2008), “Facilitating Adaptive Emotional Analysis: Distinguishing Distanced-Analysis of Depressive Experiences from Immersed-Analysis and Distraction,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34 (7), 924–38.
41.
KuporDaniellaTormalaZakary (2018), “When Moderation Fosters Persuasion: The Persuasive Power of Deviatory Reviews,” Journal of Consumer Research, 45 (3), 490–510.
42.
LaczniakRussell N.DeCarloThomas E.RamaswamiSridhar N. (2001), “Consumers’ Responses to Negative Word-of-Mouth Communication: An Attribution Theory Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11 (1), 57–73.
43.
LiuYong (2006), “Word of Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenue,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (3), 74–89.
44.
LudwigStephanDe RuyterKoFriedmanMikeBrüggenElisabeth C.WetzelsMartinPfannGerard (2013), “More Than Words: The Influence of Affective Content and Linguistic Style Matches in Online Reviews on Conversion Rates,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (1), 87–103.
45.
ManisMelvinCornellS. DouglasMooreJeffrey C. (1974), “Transmission of Attitude Relevant Information Through a Communication Chain,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30 (1), 81–94.
MenonKalyaniDubéLaurette (2007), “The Effect of Emotional Provider Support on Angry Versus Anxious Consumers,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24 (3), 268–75.
48.
MizerskiRichard W. (1982), “An Attribution Explanation of the Disproportionate Influence of Unfavorable Information,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (3), 301–10.
49.
MudambiSusan M.SchuffDavid (2010), “What Makes a Helpful Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com,” MIS Quarterly, 34 (1), 185–200.
50.
NyerPrashanth U. (2000), “An Investigation into Whether Complaining Can Cause Increased Consumer Satisfaction,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17 (1), 9–19.
51.
PanYueZhangJason Q. (2011), “Born Unequal: A Study of the Helpfulness of User-Generated Product Reviews,” Journal of Retailing, 87 (4), 598–612.
52.
ParlamisJ.D. (2012), “Venting as Emotion Regulation: The Influence of Venting Responses and Respondent Identity on Anger and Emotional Tone,” International Journal of Conflict Management, 23 (1), 77–96.
53.
PennebakerJames W.BoydRyan L.JordanKaylaBlackburnKate (2015), The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015. University of Texas at Austin.
54.
PocchiariMartinaProserpioDavideDoverYaniv (2025), “Online Reviews: A Literature Review and Roadmap for Future Research,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 42 (2), 275–97.
55.
RiméBernard (2009), “Emotion Elicits the Social Sharing of Emotion: Theory and Empirical Review,” Emotion Review, 1 (1), 60–85.
56.
RocklageMatthew D.FazioRussell H. (2020), “The Enhancing Versus Backfiring Effects of Positive Emotion in Consumer Reviews,” Journal of Marketing Research, 57 (2), 332–52.
57.
RocklageMatthew D.RuckerDerek D.NordgrenLoran F. (2018), “The Evaluative Lexicon 2.0: The Measurement of Emotionality, Extremity, and Valence in Language,” Behavior Research Methods, 50 (4), 1327–44.
58.
SenShahanaLermanDawn (2007), “Why Are You Telling Me This? An Examination into Negative Consumer Reviews on the Web,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21 (4), 76–94.
59.
SmithCraig A.LazarusRichard S. (1993), “Appraisal Components, Core Relational Themes, and the Emotions,” Cognition & Emotion, 7 (3–4), 233–69.
60.
SpencerSteven J.ZannaMark P.FongGeoffrey T. (2005), “Establishing a Causal Chain: Why Experiments Are Often More Effective Than Mediational Analyses in Examining Psychological Processes,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (6), 845–51.
61.
SundaramD.S.MitraKaushikWebsterCynthia (1998), “Word-of-Mouth Communications: A Motivational Analysis,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 25, AlbaJoseph W.HutchinsonJ. Wesley, eds. Association for Consumer Research, 527–31.
62.
WeinerBernard (2014), “The Attribution Approach to Emotion and Motivation: History, Hypotheses, Home Runs, Headaches/Heartaches,” Emotion Review, 6 (4), 353–61.
63.
WetzerInge M.ZeelenbergMarcelPietersRik (2007), “‘Never Eat in That Restaurant, I Did!’: Exploring Why People Engage in Negative Word-of-Mouth Communication,” Psychology & Marketing, 24 (8), 661–80.
64.
WillemsenLotte M.NeijensPeter C.BronnerFredDe RidderJan A. (2011), “‘Highly Recommended!’ The Content Characteristics and Perceived Usefulness of Online Consumer Reviews,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17 (1), 19–38.
65.
WoolleyKaitlinSharifMarissa A. (2021), “Incentives Increase Relative Positivity of Review Content and Enjoyment of Review Writing,” Journal of Marketing Research, 58 (3), 539–58.
66.
WuPhilip Fei (2013), “In Search of Negativity Bias: An Empirical Study of Perceived Helpfulness of Online Reviews,” Psychology & Marketing, 30 (11), 971–84.
67.
YinDezhiBondSamuelZhangHan (2021), “Anger in Consumer Reviews: Unhelpful but Persuasive?” MIS Quarterly, 45 (3), 1059–86.
68.
ZhuFengZhangXiaoquan (2010), “Impact of Online Consumer Reviews on Sales: The Moderating Role of Product and Consumer Characteristics,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (2), 133–48.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
