In general, consumers establish a preference for one product early in a decision process. When this preference does not include consideration of product prices, the currently preferred product is called the “benefits leader.” This article proposes that consumers who switch to a cheaper product after learning prices retain a trace of preference for the benefits leader. Retention of the benefits leader is evidenced by the distortion of new information to favor the benefits leader and by greater-than-normative reversion to it. The authors also find that reversion does not occur when the initially leading product (that consumers switch from) is based on a cost savings. This suggests that though consumers retain cognitive elements associated with benefits leaders, they do not retain similar elements associated with leaders based on cost savings.
BondS.D., CarlsonK.A., MeloyM.G., RussoJ.E., and TannerR.J., (2007), “Precommitment Bias in the Evaluation of Single Options,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 240–54.
CarlsonKurt A., MeloyMargaret G., and Edward RussoJ., (2006), “Leader-Driven Primacy: Using Attribute Order to Impact Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 32(March), 513–18.
4.
ChildersTerry L., HoustonMichael J., and HecklerSusan E., (1985), “Measurement of Individual Differences in Visual Versus Verbal Information Processing,”Journal of Consumer Research, 12(September), 125–34.
5.
CohenJoel B., and ReedAmericusII, (2006), “A Multiple Pathway Anchoring and Adjustment (MPAA) Model of Attitude Generation and Recruitment,”Journal of Consumer Research, 33(June), 1–15.
6.
CronleyMaria L., PosavacSteven S., MeyerTracy, KardesFrank R., and KellarisJames J., (2005), “A Selective Hypothesis Testing Perspective on Price-Quality Inference and Inference-Based Choice,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(2), 159–69.
7.
DamasioA.R., (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain.New York: Avon.
8.
FestingerLeon, (1957), A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance.Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
FischerPeter, GreitemeyerTobias, and FreyDieter, (2008), “Self-Regulation and Selective Exposure: The Impact of Depleted Self-Regulation Resources on Confirmatory Information Processing,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(3), 382–95.
10.
GerardHarold, B., (1967), “Choice Difficulty, Dissonance, and the Decision Sequence,”Journal of Personality, 35(January), 91–108.
11.
HorskyDan, NelsonPaul, and PosavacSteven S., (2004), “Stating Preference for the Ethereal but Choosing the Concrete: How the Tangibility of Attributes Affects Attribute Weighting in Value Elicitation and Choice,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1–2), 132–40.
12.
JeckerJon, D., (1964), “Selective Exposure to New Information,” in Conflict, Decision and Dissonance, FestingerLeon, ed. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 65–82.
13.
KardesFrank R., CronleyMaria L., KellarisJames J., and PosavacSteven S., (2004), “The Role of Selective Information Processing in Price–Quality Inference,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31(September), 368–74.
14.
KhanUzma, and DharRavi, (2007), “Where There Is a Way, Is There a Will? The Effect of Future Choices on Self-Control,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(May), 277–88.
15.
KivetzRan, and ZhengYuhuang, (2006), “Determinants of Justification and Self-Control,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(November), 572–87.
16.
LichtensteinDonald R., RidgwayNancy M., and NetemeyerRichard G., (1993), “Price Perceptions and Consumer Shopping Behavior: A Field Study,”Journal of Marketing Research, 30(May), 234–45.
17.
MeloyMargaret, G., (2000), “Mood-Driven Distortion of Product Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27(December), 345–59.
18.
MilkmanKatherine L., RogersTodd, and BazermanMax H., (2007), “I'll Have the Ice Cream Soon and the Vegetables Later: Decreasing Impatience over Time in Online Grocery Orders,” Working Paper No. 07–078, Negotiation, Organizations & Markets Unit, Harvard Business School, Harvard University.
19.
MontgomeryHenry, (1983), “Decision Rules and the Search for a Dominance Structure: Towards a Process Model of Decision Making,” in Analysing and Aiding Decision Processes, HumphreysP.C., SvensonOla, and VariA., eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 343–69.
20.
PetersonRobert A., and SauberMatthew H., (1983), “A Mood Scale for Survey Research” in 1983 AMA Educators’ Proceedings, No. 49, MurphyPatrick, ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 409–414.
21.
PettyRichard E., TormalaZakary L., BrinolPablo, and BlairW., JarvisG., (2006), “Implicit Ambivalence from Attitude Change: An Exploration of the PAST Model,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(January), 21–41.
22.
PosavacSteven S., SanbonmatsuDavid M., KardesFrank R., and FitzsimmonsGavan J., (2004), “The Brand Positivity Effect: When Evaluation Confers Preference,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31(December), 643–51.
23.
RussoJ. Edward, MeloyMargaret G., and MedvecVictoria H., (1998), “Predecisional Distortion of Product Information,”Journal of Marketing Research, 35(November), 438–52.
24.
ShivBaba, and FedorikhinAlexander, (1999), “Heart and Mind in Conflict: The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making,”Journal of Consumer Research, 26(December), 278–92.
25.
WebsterDonna M., and KruglanskiArie W., (1994), “Individual Differences in Need for Cognitive Closure,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(December), 1049–1062.
