Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2011-9
Will Consumers be Willing to Pay more when your Competitors Adopt your Technology? The Impacts of the Supporting-Firm Base in Markets with Network Effects
Network effects and standards competition introduce significant market uncertainty, creating a substantial challenge to the success of innovating firms. Although the literature has highlighted the importance of establishing a large installed-user base (the number of users adopting the same product) in such markets, the authors draw attention to a different, but potentially important, market force: the supporting-firm base, which they define as the number of firms supporting the same technological standard. They test their proposed hypotheses using data from two markets: the floppy disk drive and personal digital assistant markets. Their results show that (1) consumer product valuation is positively affected not only by the installed-user base but also by the supporting-firm base, (2) the two positive effects interact with each other and the nature of the interaction changes over the evolution of the market (i.e., they strengthen each other's impact in the early stage but weaken each other's impact in the late stage of the product life cycle), and (3) not all supporting firms are equally valuable to the innovator—specifically, consumers are affected more by firms exclusively supporting a single standard than by firms supporting multiple standards and by incumbents than by new entrants.
BasuAmiya, MazumdarTridib, and RajS.P. (2003), “Indirect Network Externality Effects on Product Attributes,”Marketing Science, 22(2), 209–221.
2.
BayusBarry L., JainSanjay, and RaoAmbar G. (1997), “Too Little, Too Early: Introduction Timing and New Product Performance in the Personal Digital Assistant Industry,”Journal of Marketing Research, 34(February), 50–63.
3.
BayusBarry L., JainSanjay, and RaoAmbar G. (2001), “Truth or Consequences: An Analysis of Vaporware and New Product Announcements,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38(February), 3–11.
4.
BerrySteven (1992), “Estimation of a Model of Entry in the Airline Industry,”Econometrica, 60(4), 889–917.
5.
BerrySteven (1994), “Estimating Discrete-Choice Models for Product Differentiation,”RAND Journal of Economics, 25(2), 242–62.
6.
BresnahanTimothy F., and ReissPeter (1990), “Entry in Monopoly Markets,”Review of Economic Studies, 57(4), 531–53.
7.
BresnahanTimothy F., and ReissPeter (1991), “Entry and Competition in Concentrated Markets,”Journal of Political Economy, 99(5), 977–1009.
8.
BrynjolfssonErik, and KemererChris F. (1996), “Network Externalities in Microcomputer Software: an Econometric Analysis of the Spreadsheet Market,”Management Science, 42(12), 1627–47.
9.
ChakravartiAmitav, and XieJinhong (2006), “Standards Competition and Effectiveness of Advertising Formats in New Product Introduction,”Journal of Marketing Research, 43(May), 224–36.
10.
ChristensenClayton M., SuarezFernando F., and Utter-backJames M. (1998), “Strategies for Survival in Fast-Changing Industries,”Management Science, 44(2, Part 2 of 2), S207–20.
CusumanoMichael A., MylonadisYiorgos, and RosenbloomRichard S. (1992), “Strategic Maneuvering and Mass-Market Dynamics: The Triumph of VHS over Beta,”Business History Review, 66(1), 51–94.
13.
EconomidesNicholas (1996), “Network Externalities, Complementarities, and Invitation to Enters,”European Journal of Political Economy, 12, 211–33.
14.
FarrellJoseph, and SalonerGarth (1986), “Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncement and Predation,”The American Economic Review, 76(5), 940–55.
15.
FeldmanJack, and LynchJohn (1988), “Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421–35.
GuptaSachin, JainDipak C., and SawhneyMohanbir S. (1999), “Modeling the Evolution of Markets with Indirect Network Externalities: An Application to Digital Television,”Marketing Science, 18(3), 396–416.
18.
HeckmanJames J. (1976), “Common Structure of Statistical-Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models,”Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5(4), 475–92.
19.
HeilOliver, and RobertsonThomas S. (1991), “Toward a Theory of Competitive Market Signaling: A Research Agenda,”Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 403–418.
20.
JedidiKamel, and JagpalSharan (2009), “Willingness to Pay: Measurement and Managerial Implications,” in Handbook of Pricing Research in Marketing, RaoVithala R., ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 37–60.
21.
JedidiKamel, and John ZhangZ. (2002), “Augmenting Conjoint Analysis to Estimate Consumer Reservation Price,”Management Science, 48(10), 1350–68.
22.
KatzMichael, and ShapiroCarl (1985), “Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility,”American Economic Review, 75(3), 424–40.
23.
KatzMichael, and ShapiroCarl (1994), “System Competition and Network Effects,”Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 93–115.
24.
LernerJosh (1997), “An Empirical Exploration of a Technology Race,”RAND Journal of Economics, 28(2), 228–47.
25.
McFaddenDaniel (1974), “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior,” in Frontiers in Econometrics, ZarembkaP., ed. New York: Academic Press.
26.
McFaddenDaniel (1986), “The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research,”Marketing Science, 5(4), 275–94.
27.
MitchellWill (1989), “Whether and When? Probability and Timing of Incumbents’ Entry into Emerging Industrial Subfields,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(2), 208–30.
28.
MitchellWill (1991), “Dual Clocks: Entry Order Influences on Incumbent and Newcomer Market Share and Survival When Specialized Assets Retain Their Value,”Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 85–100.
29.
MitchellWill, and SinghKulwant (1993), “Death of the Lethargic: Effect of Expansion into New Technological Subfields on Performance in a Firm's Base Business,”Organization Science, 4(2), 152–80.
30.
NairHarikesh, ChintaguntaPradeep, and DubeJean-Pierre (2004), “Empirical Analysis of Indirect Network Effects in the Market for Personal Digital Assistants,”Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 2(1), 23–58.
31.
OhashiHiroshi (2003), “The Role of Network Effects in the U.S. VCR Market 1978–1986,”Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12(4), 447–94.
32.
OxleyJoanne E., SampsonRachelle C., and SilvermanBrian S. (2009), “Arms Race or Detente? How Interfirm Alliance Announcements Change the Stock Market Valuation of Rivals,”Management Science, 55(8), 1321–37.
33.
PorterJames (1983), Disk/Trend Report.Mountain View, CA: Disk/Trend Inc.
34.
ShankarVenkatesh, and BayusBerry L. (2003), “Network Effects and Competition: An Empirical Analysis of the Home Video Game Industry,”Strategic Management Journal, 24(4), 375–84.
35.
ShapiroCarl, and VarianHal R. (1998), Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
36.
SinghVishal, and ZhuTing (2008), “Pricing and Market Concentration in Oligopoly Markets,”Marketing Science, 27(6), 1020–35.
37.
SrinivasanRaji, LilienGary L., and RangaswamyArvind (2004), “First In, First Out? The Effects of Network Externalities on Pioneer Survival,”Journal of Marketing, 68(January), 41–58.
38.
SrinivasanRaji, LilienGary L., and RangaswamyArvind (2006), “The Emergence of Dominant Designs,”Journal of Marketing, 70(April), 1–17.
39.
SrinivasanRaji, LilienGary L., and RangaswamyArvind (2008), “The Effects of Diversity of Product-Market Portfolios on Firm Exit,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(2), 119–28.
40.
SunBaohong, XieJinhong, and Henry CaoH. (2004), “Product Strategy for Innovators in Markets with Network Effects,”Marketing Science, 23(2), 243–54.
41.
SwaminathanVanitha, and MoormanChristine (2009), “Marketing Alliances, Firm Networks, and Firm Value Creation,”Journal of Marketing, 73(September), 52–69.
42.
SwannG.M. Peter (1987), “Industry Standard Microprocessors and the Strategy of Second Source Production,” in Product Standardization and Competitive Strategy, Landis GabelH., ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 239–62.
43.
ValigraJ. (1981), “Sony Enters OEM Market with 3 1/2 Inch Floppy,”Mini Micro System, (April).
44.
WadeJames (1995), “Dynamics of Organizational Communities and Technological Bandwagons: An Empirical Investigation of Community Evolution in the Microprocessor Market,”Strategic Management Journal, 16(Summer), 111–33.
45.
WangQi, ChenYubo, and XieJinhong (2010), “Survival in Markets with Network Effects: Product Compatibility and Order-of-Entry Effects,”Journal of Marketing, 74(July), 1–14.
XieJinhong, and SirbuMarvin (1995), “Price Competition and Compatibility in the Presence of Positive Demand Externalities,”Management Science, 41(5), 909–926.
48.
ZeithamlValarie A. (1988), “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means–End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,”Journal of Marketing, 52(July), 2–22.
