Although the returns of customer participation on new product development (NPD) performance can vary substantially, the current literature lacks a systematic conceptual and empirical integration showing when customer participation is valuable in enhancing NPD performance. Building on knowledge management theory, the authors present a conceptual framework that synthesizes a variety of contingency factors. A meta-analysis empirically examines the moderating effects of contextual factors between customer participation and NPD performance. The analysis reveals that involving customers in the ideation and launch stages of NPD improves new product financial performance directly as well as indirectly through acceleration of time to market, whereas customer participation in the development phase slows down time to market, deteriorating new product financial performance. Furthermore, the benefits of customer participation on NPD performance are greater in technologically turbulent NPD projects, in emerging countries, in low-tech industries, for business customers, and for small firms. The authors discuss several theoretical and managerial implications about when to engage customers in the innovation process.
ArnoldTodd J., FangEric (Er), and PalmatierRobert W. (2011), “The Effects of Customer Acquisition and Retention Orientations on a Firm's Radical and Incremental Innovation Performance,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (2), 234–51.
2.
BettisRichard A. and PrahaladCoimbatore K. (1995), “The Dominant Logic: Retrospective and Extension,”Strategic Management Journal, 16 (1), 5–14.
3.
BogersMarcel, AfuahAllan, and BastianBettina (2010), “Users as Innovators: A Review, Critique, and Future Research Directions,”Journal of Management, 36 (July), 857–75.
4.
BorensteinMichael, HedgesLarry V., HigginsJulian P.T., and RothsteinHannah R. (2009), Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Cornwall, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
5.
BoydEric D., ChandyRajesh K., and CunhaMarcusJr. (2010), “When Do Chief Marketing Officers Affect Firm Value? A Customer Power Explanation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (December), 1162–76.
6.
BrockhoffKlaus (2003), “Customers’ Perspectives of Involvement in New Product Development,”International Journal of Technology Management, 26 (5/6), 464–81.
7.
BrockmanBeverly K. and MorganRobert M. (2003), “The Role of Existing Knowledge in New Product Innovativeness and Performance,”Decision Sciences, 34 (2), 385–419.
8.
CarbonellPilar, Rodríguez-EscuderoAna I., and PujariDevashish (2009), “Customer Involvement in New Service Development: An Examination of Antecedents and Outcomes,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26 (5), 536–50.
9.
ChanKimmy Wa, YimChi Kin, and LamSimon S.K. (2010), “Is Customer Participation in Value Creation a Double-Edged Sword? Evidence from Professional Financial Services Across Cultures,”Journal of Marketing, 74 (May), 48–64.
10.
ChatterjiAaron K. and FabrizioKira R. (2014), “Using Users: When Does External Knowledge Enhance Corporate Product Innovation?”Strategic Management Journal, 35 (10), 1427–45.
11.
ChesbroughHenry W. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
12.
ChesbroughHenry W. and CrowtherAdrienne K. (2006), “Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries,”R&D Management, 36 (3), 229–36.
13.
ChristensenClayton M. (1997), The Innovator's Dilemma. New York: HarperBusiness.
14.
ChristensenClayton M. and BowerJoseph L. (1996), “Customer Power, Strategic Investment, and the Failure of Leading Firms,”Strategic Management Journal, 17 (3), 197–218.
15.
CohenWesley M. and LevinthalDaniel A. (1990), “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128–52.
16.
CovielloNicole E. and JosephRichard M. (2012), “Creating Major Innovations with Customers: Insights from Small and Young Technology Firms,”Journal of Marketing, 76 (November), 87–104.
17.
CuiAnna S. and WuFang (2015), “Utilizing Customer Knowledge in Innovation: Antecedents and Impact of Customer Involvement on New Product Performance,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, (published electronically March 12), [DOI: 10.1007/s11747-015-0433-x].
18.
DanneelsErwin and SethiRajesh (2011), “New Product Exploration Under Environmental Turbulence,”Organization Science, 22 (4), 1026–39.
19.
De LucaLuigi M. and Atuahene-GimaKwaku (2007), “Market Knowledge Dimensions and Cross-Functional Collaboration: Examining the Different Routes to Product Innovation Performance,”Journal of Marketing, 71 (January), 95–112.
20.
De LucaLuigi M., VeronaGianmario, and VicariSalvio (2010), “Market Orientation and R&D Effectiveness in High-Technology Firms: An Empirical Investigation in the Biotechnology Industry,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27 (3), 299–320.
21.
DuvalSue and TweedieRichard (2000), “A Nonparametric ‘Trim and Fill’ Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95 (449), 89–98.
22.
EggersFabian, KrausSascha, and CovinJeffrey G. (2014), “Traveling into Unexplored Territory: Radical Innovativeness and the Role of Networking, Customers, and Technologically Turbulent Environments,”Industrial Marketing Management, 43 (8), 1385–93.
23.
EisendMartin (2015), “Have We Progressed Marketing Knowledge? A Meta-Meta-Analysis of Effect Sizes in Marketing Research,”Journal of Marketing, 79 (May), 23–40.
24.
EnkelEllen, KauschChristoph, and GassmannOliver (2005), “Managing the Risk of Customer Integration,”European Management Journal, 23 (2), 203–13.
25.
ErnstHolger, HoyerWayne D., and RübsaamenCarsten (2010), “Sales, Marketing, and Research-and-Development Cooperation Across New Product Development Stages: Implications for Success,”Journal of Marketing, 74 (September), 80–92.
26.
EtgarMichael (2008), “A Descriptive Model of the Consumer Co-Production Process,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (1), 97–108.
27.
FangEric (2008), “Customer Participation and the Trade-Off Between New Product Innovativeness and Speed to Market,”Journal of Marketing, 72 (July), 90–104.
28.
FordGary T., SmithDarlene B., and SwasyJohn (1990), “Consumer Skepticism of Advertising Claims: Testing Hypotheses from Economics of Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (4), 433–41.
29.
FrankeNikolaus, KeinzPeter, and KlausbergerKatharina (2013), “Does This Sound Like a Fair Deal? Antecedents and Consequences of Fairness Expectations in the Individual's Decision to Participate in Firm Innovation,”Organization Science, 24 (5), 1495–1516.
30.
FrankeNikolaus, and StegerChristoph J. (2009), “Testing the Value of Customization: When Do Customers Really Prefer Products Tailored to Their Preferences?”Journal of Marketing, 73 (September), 103–21.
31.
GargiuloMartin and BenassiMario (2000), “Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes, and the Adaptation of Social Capital,”Organization Science, 11 (2), 183–96.
32.
GeyskensInge, KrishnanRekha, SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M., and CunhaPaulo V. (2009), “A Review and Evaluation of Meta-Analysis Practices in Management Research,”Journal of Management, 35 (2), 393–419.
33.
GrunerKjell E. and HomburgChristian (2000), “Does Customer Interaction Enhance New Product Success?”Journal of Business Research, 49 (1), 1–14.
34.
HarrisonJeffrey S., BanksGeorge Christopher, PollackJeffrey M., O'BoyleErnest H., and ShortJeremy (2014), “Publication Bias in Strategic Management Research,”Journal of Management, (published electronically May 28), [DOI: 10.1509/0149206314535438].
35.
HenardDavid H. and SzymanskiDavid M. (2001), “Why Some New Products Are More Successful than Others,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (August), 362–75.
36.
HerstattCornelius and von HippelEric (1992), “From Experience: Developing New Product Concepts via the Lead User Method: A Case Study in a ‘Low-Tech’ Field,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9 (3), 213–21.
37.
HittMichael A., DacinM. Tina, LevitasEdward, ArregleJean-Luc, and BorzaAnca (2000), “Partner Selection in Emerging and Developed Market Contexts: Resource-Based and Organizational Learning Perspectives,”Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3), 449–67.
38.
HoxJoop (2010), Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
39.
HoyerWayne D., ChandyRajesh, DoroticMatilda, KrafftManfred, and SinghSiddharth S. (2010), “Consumer Cocreation in New Product Development,”Journal of Service Research, 13 (3), 283–96.
40.
HuffcuttAllen I. and ArthurWinfred (1995), “Development of a New Outlier Statistic for Meta-Analytic Data,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 80 (2), 327–34.
41.
HunterJohn E. and SchmidtFrank L. (1990), Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
42.
JaworskiBernard J. and KohliAjay K. (1993), “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences,”Journal of Marketing, 57 (July), 53–70.
43.
JoshiAshwin and SharmaSanjay (2004), “Customer Knowledge Development: Antecedents and Impact on New Product Performance,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (October), 47–59.
44.
KatzRalph and AllenThomas J. (1985), “Organizational Issues in the Introduction of New Technologies,” in The Management of Productivity and Technology in Manufacturing, KleindorferP.R., ed. New York: Plenum Press, 275–300.
45.
KircaAhmet H., JayachandranSatish, and BeardenWilliam O. (2005), “Market Orientation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of Its Antecedents and Impact on Performance,”Journal of Marketing, 69 (April), 24–41.
46.
LakhaniKarim R., CohenWesley M., IngramKynon, KethalkarTushar, KuzemchemkoMaxim, MalikSantosh, et al. (2014), “Netflix: Designing the Netflix Prize (A),”Harvard Business School Case615-015, (August 14), (accessed October 19, 2015), [available at https://hbr.org/product/Netflix–Designing-the-Ne/an/615015-PDF-ENG].
47.
LeeJongkuk (2011), “The Alignment of Contract Terms for Knowledge-Creating and Knowledge-Appropriating Relationship Portfolios,”Journal of Marketing, 75 (July), 110–27.
48.
Leonard-BartonDorothy (1992), “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development,”Strategic Management Journal, 13 (S1), 111–25.
49.
LiChia-Ying and HsiehChang-Tseh (2009), “The Impact of Knowledge Stickiness on Knowledge Transfer Implementation, Internalization, and Satisfaction for Multinational Corporations,”International Journal of Information Management, 29 (6), 425–35.
50.
LilienGary L., MorrisonPamela D., SearlsKathleen, SonnackMary, and von HippelEric (2002), “Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-Generation Process for New Product Development,”Management Science, 48 (8), 1042–59.
51.
LipseyMark W. and WilsonDavid B. (2000), Practical Meta-Analysis. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 49. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
52.
Lopez-LopezJose Antonio, Marin-MartinezFulgencio, Sanchez-MecaJulio, Van der NoortgateWim, and ViechtbauerWolfgang (2014), “Estimation of the Predictive Power of the Model in Mixed-Effects Meta-Regression: A Simulation Study,”British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 67 (1), 30–48.
53.
MahrDominik, LievensAnnouk, and BlazevicVera (2014), “The Value of Customer Cocreated Knowledge During the Innovation Process,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31 (3), 599–615.
54.
NambisanSatish (2002), “Designing Virtual Customer Environments for New Product Development: Toward a Theory,”Academy of Management Review, 27 (3), 392–413.
55.
NarverJohn C. and SlaterStanley F. (1990), “The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability,”Journal of Marketing, 54 (October), 20–35.
56.
NishikawaHidehiko, SchreierMartin, and OgawaSusumu (2013), “User-Generated Versus Designer-Generated Products: A Performance Assessment at Muji,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30 (2), 160–67.
57.
OttenbacherMichael C. and HarringtonRobert J. (2010), “Strategies for Achieving Success for Innovative Versus Incremental New Services,”Journal of Services Marketing, 24 (1), 3–15.
58.
PoetzMarion K. and SchreierMartin (2012), “The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas?”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29 (2), 245–56.
59.
Product Development Management Association (2013), “The State of Product Development in 2013: A Need for Speed and a Roadmap to Sustainable Innovation,”research report, (accessed August 19, 2015), [available at http://go.planview.com/product-portfolio-management-benchmark-study/].
60.
RuberaGaia, ChandrasekaranDeepa, and OrdaniniAndrea (2015), “Open Innovation, Product Portfolio Innovativeness and Firm Performance: The Dual Role of New Product Development Capabilities,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, (published electronically January 11), [DOI: 10.1007/s11747-014-0423-4].
61.
RuberaGaia and KircaAhmet H. (2012), “Firm Innovativeness and Its Performance Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration,”Journal of Marketing, 76 (May), 130–47.
62.
SchaarschmidtMario and KilianThomas (2014), “Impediments to Customer Integration into the Innovation Process: A Case Study in the Telecommunications Industry,”European Management Journal, 32 (2), 350–61.
63.
SchleimerStephanie C. and ShulmanArthur D. (2011), “A Comparison of New Service Versus New Product Development: Configurations of Collaborative Intensity as Predictors of Performance,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (4), 521–35.
64.
SkålénPer, GummerusJohanna, von KoskullCatharina, and MagnussonPeter R. (2015), “Exploring Value Propositions and Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Study,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (2), 137–58.
65.
SouderWilliam E., ShermanJ. Daniel, and Davies-CooperRachel (1998), “Environmental Uncertainty, Organizational Integration, and New Product Development Effectiveness: A Test of Contingency Theory,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15 (6), 520–33.
66.
SzulanskiGabriel (1996), “Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm,”Strategic Management Journal, 17 (S2), 27–43.
67.
SzymanskiDavid M., KroffMichael W., and TroyLisa C. (2007), “Innovativeness and New Product Success: Insights from the Cumulative Evidence,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35 (1), 35–52.
68.
TroyLisa C., HirunyawipadaTanawat, and PaswanAudhesh K. (2008), “Cross-Functional Integration and New Product Success: An Empirical Investigation of the Findings,”Journal of Marketing, 72 (November), 132–46.
69.
TroyLisa C., SzymanskiDavid M., and VaradarajanP. Rajan (2001), “Generating New Product Ideas: An Initial Investigation of the Role of Market Information and Organizational Characteristics,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29 (1), 89–101.
70.
UnC. Annique and AsakawaKazuhiro (2015), “Types of R&D Collaborations and Process Innovation: The Benefits of Collaborating Upstream in the Knowledge Chain,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32 (1), 138–53.
71.
VargoStephen L. and LuschRobert F. (2004), “The Four Service Marketing Myths: Remnants of a Goods-Based, Manufacturing Model,”Journal of Service Research, 6 (4), 324–35.
72.
VeveaJack L. and WoodsCarol M. (2005), “Publication Bias in Research Synthesis: Sensitivity Analysis Using A Priori Weight Functions,”Psychological Methods, 10(4), 428–43.
73.
Von HippelEric (1986), “Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts,”Management Science, 32 (7), 791–805.
74.
Von HippelEric (1988), The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
75.
Von HippelEric (1994), “‘Sticky Information’ and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation,”Management Science, 40 (4), 429–39.
76.
WitellLars, GustafssonAnders, and JohnsonMichael D. (2014), “The Effect of Customer Information During New Product Development on Profits from Goods and Services,”European Journal of Marketing, 48 (9/10), 1709–30.
77.
ZouHuan, ChenXiaoyun, and GhauriPervex (2010), “Antecedents and Consequences of New Venture Growth Strategy: An Empirical Study in China,”Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27 (3), 393–421.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
