Although the goal of a product recall program is to enhance safety, little is known about whether firms learn from product recalls. This study tests the direct effect of product recalls on future accidents and future recall frequency and their indirect effect through future product reliability in the automobile industry. The authors test the hypotheses on 459 make/year observations involving 27 automobile makers between 1995 and 2011. The findings suggest that increases in recall magnitude lead to decreases in future number of injuries and recalls. This effect, in turn, is partially mediated by future changes in product reliability. The results also suggest that the positive relationship between recall magnitude and future product reliability is (1) stronger for firms with higher shared product assets and (2) weaker for brands of higher prior quality. The findings are robust across alternate measures and alternate model specifications and offer valuable insights for managerial practice and public policy.
BaltagiBadi, H. (2005), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 2d ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
6.
BarberBrad M., and DarroughMasako N. (1996), “Product Reliability and Firm Value: The Experience of American and Japanese Automakers,”Journal of Political Economy, 104(5), 1084–99.
7.
BaronReuben M., and KennyDavid A. (1986), “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–82.
8.
BlincoeL., SeayA., ZaloshnjaE., MillerT., RomanoE., LuchterS. (2002), “The Economic Impact of Motor Vehicle Crashes, 2000,” in National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT HS 809 446.Washington, DC: NHTSA.
9.
BouldingWilliam, and StaelinRichard (1995), “Identifying Generalizable Effects of Strategic Actions on Firm Performance: The Case of Demand-Side Returns to R&D Spending,”Marketing Science, 14(3), G222–G226.
10.
BreuschT.S., and PaganA.R. (1980), “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics,”Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–54.
11.
BurgoonJudee K., and LePoireBeth A. (1993), “Effects of Communication Expectancies, Actual Communication, and Expectancy Disconfirmation on Evaluations of Communicators and Their Communication Behavior,”Human Communications Research, 20(1), 67–96.
12.
ChaoGary H., IravaniSyed M.R., and SavaskanCanan R. (2009), “Quality Improvement Incentives and Product Recall Cost Sharing Contracts,”Management Science, 55(July), 1122–38.
13.
ChenYubo, GanesanShankar, and LiuYong (2009), “Does a Firm's Product Recall Strategy Affect Its Financial Value? An Examination of Strategic Alternatives During Product-Harm Crises,”Journal of Marketing, 73(November), 214–26.
14.
CleerenKathleen, DekimpeMarnik G., and HelsenKristiaan (2008), “Weathering Product-Harm Crises,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(2), 262–70.
CottrellTom, and NaultBarrie R. (2004), “Product Variety and Firm Survival in the Microcomputer Industry,”Strategic Management Journal, 25(October), 1005–1025.
17.
CPSC (2010), “Consumer Product-Related Injuries and Deaths in the United States: Estimated Injuries Occurring in 2010 and Estimated Deaths Occurring in 2008,” CPSC website, (accessed December 13, 2012), [available at http://www.cpsc.gov/library/foia/foia12/os/2010injury.pdf].
18.
CyertRichard M., and MarchJames G. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
DawarNiraj, and PillutlaMadan (2000), “Impact of Product-Harm Crises on Brand Equity: The Moderating Role of Consumer Expectations,”Journal of Marketing Research, 37(May), 215–26.
20.
DekimpeMarnik G., and HanssensDominique M. (1999), “Sustained Spending and Persistent Response: A New Look at Long-Term Marketing Profitability,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36(November), 397–412.
21.
DiMaggioPaul J., and PowellWalter W. (1983), “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,”American Sociological Review, 48(April), 147–60.
22.
FisherMarshall, RamdasKamalini, and UlrichKarl (1999), “Component Sharing in the Management of Product Variety: A Study of Automotive Braking Systems,”Management Science, 45(March), 297–315.
23.
FitzsimmonsGavan (2008), “Death to Dichotomizing,”Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 5–8.
24.
GolderPeter N., MitraDebanjan, and MoormanChristine (2012), “What Is Quality? An Integrative Framework of Processes and States,”Journal of Marketing, 76(July), 1–23.
25.
GrangerClive W.J., and NewboldPaul (1974), “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics,”Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111–20.
26.
GreveHenrich, R. (1998), “Performance, Aspirations, and Risky Organizational Change,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 58–86.
27.
HanssensDominique M., ParsonsLeonard J., and SchultzRandall L. (2003), Market Response Models: Econometric and Time Series Analysis.Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
28.
HaunschildPamela R., and RheeMooweon (2004), “The Role of Volition in Organizational Learning: The Case of Automotive Product Recalls,”Management Science, 50(11), 1545–60.
29.
HaunschildPamela R., and SullivanBilian N. (2002), “Learning from Complexity: Effects of Prior Accidents and Incidents on Airlines’ Learning,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 609–43.
30.
HauserJohn, H. (1999), “Strategic Priorities in Product Development,” working paper, MIT Sloan School, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
31.
IrwinJulie R., and McClellandGary H. (2001), “Misleading Heuristics and Moderated Multiple Regression Models,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38(February), 100–109.
32.
JarrellGreg, and PeltzmanSam (1985), “The Impact of Product Recalls on the Wealth of Sellers,”Journal of Political Economy, 93(3), 512–36.
33.
PowerJ.D., and Associates (2004), “Consumer Survey in the Auto Industry,” (accessed February 10, 2012), [available at http://www.jdpower.com].
34.
KimMinChung, and McAlisterLeigh M. (2011), “Stock Market Reaction to Unexpected Growth in Marketing Expenditure: Negative for Sales Force, Contingent on Spending Level for Advertising,”Journal of Marketing, 75(July), 68–85.
35.
KrishnanV., and GuptaSaurabh (2001), “Appropriateness and Impact of Platform-Based Product Development,”Management Science, 47(January), 52–68.
36.
LeeflangPeter (2011), “Paving the Way for Distinguished Marketing,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(2), 76–88.
37.
LevinDaniel, Z. (2000), “Organizational Learning and the Transfer of Knowledge: An Investigation of Quality Improvement,”Organization Science, 11(6), 630–47.
38.
LevinthalDaniel A., and MarchJames G. (1993), “The Myopia of Learning,”Strategic Management Journal, 14(Winter), 95–112.
39.
LevittBarbara, and MarchJames G. (1988), “Organizational Learning,”Annual Review of Sociology, 14(Winter), 319–40.
40.
MarchJames, G. (1991), “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,”Organizational Science, 2(1), 71–87.
41.
McAlisterLeigh, SrinivasanRaji, and KimMinChung (2007), “Advertising, Research and Development, and Systematic Risk of the Firm,”Journal of Marketing, 71(January), 35–48.
42.
McDonaldKevin, M. (2009), “Do Auto Recalls Benefit the Public?”Regulation, (Summer), 12–17.
43.
MeyerMark H., and UtterbackJames M. (1992), “The Product Family and Dynamics of Core Capability,”Sloan Management Review, 34(3), 29–47.
44.
MinerAnne S., KimJi-Yub, HolzingerIngo W., and HaunschildPamela R. (1999), “Fruits of Failure: Organizational Failure and Population-Level Learning,” in Advances in Strategic Management, MinerA.S., and AndersonP., eds. Stamford, CT: JAI Press, 187–220.
45.
MitraDebanjan, and GolderPeter N. (2006), “How Does Objective Quality Affect Perceived Quality? Short-Term Effects, Long-Term Effects and Asymmetries,”Marketing Science, 25(May/June), 230–47.
46.
MizikNatalie, and JacobsonRobert (2007), “Myopic Marketing Management: Evidence of the Phenomenon and Its Long-Term Performance Consequences in the SEO Context,”Marketing Science, 26(3), 361–79.
47.
MizikNatalie, and JacobsonRobert (2008), “The Financial Value Impact of Perceptual Brand Attributes,”Journal of Marketing Research, 45(February), 15–32.
48.
ModiSachin B., and MishraSaurabh (2011), “What Drives Financial Performance—Resource Efficiency or Resource Slack? Evidence from U.S. Based Manufacturing Firms from 1991 to 2006,”Journal of Operations Management, 29(March), 259–74.
49.
MoormanChristine, and MinerAnne (1997), “The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity,”Journal of Marketing Research, 34(February), 91–106.
50.
MurthyD.N.P., RausandM., and ØsteråsT. (2008), Product Reliability: Specification and Performance.London: Springer.
51.
NohriaNitin, and GulatiRanjay (1996), “Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation?”Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245–64.
52.
PauwelsKoen, Silva-RissoJorge, SrinivasanShuba, and HanssensDominique M. (2004), “New Products, Sales Promotions, and Firm Value: The Case of the Automobile Industry,”Journal of Marketing, 68(October), 142–56.
53.
RamdasKamalini (2003), “Managing Product Variety: An Integrative Review and Research Directions,”Production and Operations Management, 12(March), 79–101.
54.
RheeMooweon, and HaunschildPamela R. (2006), “The Liability of a Good Reputation: A Study of Product Recalls in the U.S. Automotive Industry,”Organization Science, 17(1), 101–117.
55.
RobertsonDavid, and UlrichKarl (1998), “Planning for Product Platforms,”Sloan Management Review, 39(4), 19–31.
56.
RuppNicholas G., and TaylorCurtis R. (2002), “Who Initiates Recalls and Who Cares? Evidence from the Automobile Industry,”Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2), 123–49.
SinkulaJames (1994), “Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning,”Journal of Marketing, 58(January), 35–45.
59.
SrinivasanShuba, PauwelsKoen, Silva-RissoJorge, and HanssensDominique (2009), “Product Innovations, Advertising, and Stock Returns,”Journal of Marketing, 73(January), 24–43.
60.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M., van HeerdeHarald J., and GeyskensInge (2010), “What Makes Consumers Willing to Pay a Price Premium for National Brands Over Private Labels?”Journal of Marketing Research, 47(December), 1011–24.
61.
SzulanskiGabriel (1996), “Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm,”Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter), 27–43.
62.
TaxStephen S., BrownStephen W., and ChandrashekaranMurali (1998), “Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experiences: Implications for Relationship Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 62(April), 60–76.
63.
ThirumalaiSriram, and SinhaKingshuk K. (2011), “Product Recalls in the Medical Device Industry: An Empirical Exploration of the Sources and Financial Consequences,”Management Science, 57(2), 376–92.
64.
TyreMarcie J., and OrlikowskiWanda J. (1994), “Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations,”Organization Science, 5(February), 98–118.
65.
Van HeerdeHarald J., HelsenKristiaan, and DekimpeMarnik G. (2007), “The Impact of a Product-Harm Crisis on Marketing Effectiveness,”Marketing Science, 26(2), 230–45.
66.
VossGlenn B., SirdeshmukhDeepak, and VossZannie G. (2008), “The Effects of Slack Resources and Environmental Threat on Product Exploration and Exploitation,”Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 147–64.
67.
WakabayashiDaisuke (2010), “How Lean Manufacturing Can Backfire,”The Wall Street Journal, (January 30).
68.
The Wall Street Journal (1983), “GM Accuses U.S. of Unfair Pressure Over X-Car Brakes,” (November 3).
69.
Ward's Auto World (1997), “Suppliers to Cover Warranty Costs,”33(6), 21–22.
70.
WooldridgeJeffrey, M. (2002), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71.
ZhaoXinshu, LynchJohn G., and ChenQimei (2010), “Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths About Mediation Analysis,”Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.
72.
ZhaoYi, ZhaoYing, and HelsenKristiaan (2011), “Consumer Learning in a Turbulent Market Environment: Modeling Consumer Choice Dynamics After a Product Harm Crises,”Journal of Marketing Research, 48(April), 255–67.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
