A product placement can be characterized by its prominence and its plot connection. This research scrutinizes the interaction between these two elements in the context of the consumer perceptual process. The results of a survey based on 32,662 exposures to brand placements in DVD movies showed that prominent and plot connected placements lead to better brand recall (spontaneous day-after recall) than prominent placements that are not plot connected, and that the latter leads to better brand recall than plot connected placements that are not prominent. The brands appearing in non prominent and non plot connected placements are the worst recalled.
AlfordB.L. and EngellandB.T. (2004), Measurement validation in marketing research: A review and commentary, Journal of Business Research, 57, 2, 95–97.
2.
AnzaiY. (2003), The perception of Japanese university students concerning product placement in Hollywood movies, The Economic Journal of Takasaki City University of Economics, 46, 3, 107–116.
3.
BaddeleyA. (1997), Human memory: theory and practice (revised edition), London, Psychology Press.
4.
BagozziR.P. and SilkA.J. (1983), Recall, recognition, and the measurement of memory for print advertisement, Marketing Science, 2, 2, 95–134.
5.
BalasubramanianS.K. (1994), Beyond advertising and publicity: Hybrid messages and public policy issues, Journal of Advertising, 23, 4, 29–46.
6.
BatraR. and AtholaO.T. (1990), Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes, Marketing Letters, 2, 2, 159–170.
7.
BatraR. and RayM. (1986), Situational effects of advertising: The moderating influence of motivation, ability and opportunity to respond, Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 4, 432–445.
8.
BattaisL. (2003), L'efficacité des actions de marketing direct sur les marchés de grande consommation: L'expérience BehaviorScan en France et en Allemagne, Décisions Marketing, 30, 63–75.
9.
BelchG.E. (1982), The effects of television commercial repetition on cognitive response and message acceptance, Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 1, 56–65.
10.
BlackstonM. (2000), Pay attention! This advertising is effective, Admap, March.
11.
BlondéK. and RoozenI. (2007), An explorative study testing the effectiveness of product placement compared to 30-second commercials, paper presented at the Congrès des Tendances Marketing Paris-Venice, Paris, 26-27 January.
12.
BréeJ. (1996), Le placement de produits dans les films: Une communication originale, Décisions Marketing, 8, 65–74.
13.
BrennanI. and BabinL.A. (2004), Brand placement recognition: The influence of presentation mode and brand familiarity, Journal of Promotion Management, 10, 1/2, 185–202.
14.
BrennanS., RosenbergerP.J.III and HementeraV. (2004), Product placements in movies, an Australian consumer perspective and their ethicality and acceptability, Marketing Bulletin, 15, 1, 1–16.
15.
BressoudE. and LehuJ.-M. (2008), Le placement de marques dans les films. Panorama, modalités d'exécution et efficacité, La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 233, 101–114.
16.
BressoudE., LehuJ.-M. and RussellC. (2008), Integrating placement and audience characteristics to assess the recall of product placements in film: findings from a field study, paper presented at the 7th International Conference “Research in Advertising” (ICORIA), Antwerp, Belgium, 27-28 June.
17.
BundesenC. (1990), A theory of visual attention, Psychological Review, 97, 4, 523–547.
18.
BusharaK.O., WeeksR.A., IshiiK., CatalanM.J., TianB., RauscheckerJ.P. and HallettM. (1999), Modality-specific frontal and parietal areas for auditory and visual spatial localization in humans, Nature Neuroscience, 2, 8, 759–766.
19.
CalderB.J., PhillipsL.W. and TyboutA.M. (1982) The concept of external validity, Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 3, 240–244.
20.
CampbellM.C. and KirmaniA. (2000), Consumers' use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent, Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 1, 69–83.
21.
CampbellM.C., MohrG.S. and VerleghP. (2007), Examining effects of product placement and sponsorship disclosure: a flexible correction approach, paper presented at La Londe Seminar in Marketing Communications and Consumer Behavior, La Londe, 5–8 June.
22.
ChapmanR.M., McCraryJ.W. and ChapmanJ.A. (1978), Short-term memory: The “storage” component of human brain responses predicts recall, Science, 202, 4373, 1211–1214.
23.
CNC (2005a), Le marché du cinéma en vidéo, CNC Info, le dossier du CNC, Spécial Vidéo, n° 293, March.
24.
CNC (2005b), De la salle à la vidéo, CNC Info, le dossier du CNC, Spécial Vidéo, n° 293, March.
25.
CostleyC.L., DasS. and BrucksM. (1997), Presentation medium and spontaneous imaging effects on consumer memory, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6, 3, 211–231.
26.
CowleyE. and BarronC. (2008), When product placement goes wrong. The effects of program liking and placement proeminence, Journal of Advertising, 37, 1, 89–98.
27.
CronbachL.J. and MeehlP.E. (1955), Construct validity in psychological tests, Psychological Bulletin, 52, 4, 281–302.
28.
d'AstousA. and ChartierF. (2000), A study of factors affecting consumer evaluations and memory of product placements in movies, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 22, 2, 31–40.
29.
DalliD. (2003), Il product placement cinematografico: oltre la pubblicità?, paper presented at the 3rd Congrès des Tendances Marketing, Venice, 18-29 November.
30.
DambronP. (1991), Sponsoring et politique de marketing, Paris, Éditions d'Organisation.
31.
DarpyD. and VolleP. (2007), Comportement du consommateur, concepts et outils, Paris, Dunod.
32.
DaughertyT. and GangadharbatlaH. (2005), A comparison of consumers' responses to traditional advertising and product placement strategies: implications for advertisers, paper presented at AMA Winter Educators' conference, San Antonio, TX, 11-14 February.
33.
Deloitte (2005), TMT Trends: predictions, 2005: a focus on the media sector, LeePaul (Ed.), Cabinet Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, United States, Netherlands, Hong-Kong.
34.
DeLormeD.E. and ReidL.N. (1999), Moviegoers' experiences and interpretations of brands in films revisited, Journal of Advertising, 28, 2, 72–95.
35.
DeLormeD.E., ReidL.N. and ZimmerM.R. (1994), Brands in films: young moviegoers' experiences and interpretations, paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Academy of Advertising.
36.
DonatonS. (2004), Madison & Vine, New York, NY, Editions Advertising Age McGraw-Hill.
37.
DroulersO. (2000), Perception subliminale: Une expérimentation sur le processus d'activation sémantique des marques, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 15, 4, 43–59.
38.
DunnS.W., BarbanA.M., KrugmanD.M. and ReidL.N. (1990), Advertising: its role in modern marketing (7th edition), New York, NY, The Dryden Press (Holt, Rinehart and Winston).
39.
EdwardsS.M., LiH. and LeeJ.H. (2002), Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads, Journal of Advertising, 31, 3, 83–96.
40.
EhrenbergA.S.C. (1974), Repetitive advertising and the consumer, Journal of Advertising Research, 14, 2, 25–34.
41.
EliashbergJ., ElberseA. and LeendersM. (2006), The motion picture industry: Critical issues in practice, current research, and new research directions, Marketing Science, 25, 6, 638–661.
42.
EmlingS. (2008), Men in tights, for real, The Washington Times, September 3rd.
43.
EngelB. (2005), Spring 2005 national consumer studies, Florida, Simons Market Research.
EvrardY., PrasB. and RouxE. (2003), Market, Études et recherches en marketing (3rd edition), Paris, Dunod.
46.
FalcyS. (1993), Pour une approche individuelle des processus de persuasion publicitaire, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 8, 3, 45–63.
47.
FilserM. (1993), Le comportement du consommateur, Paris, Dalloz.
48.
FontaineI. (2001), Le placement de marques dans les films: apports du cadre théorique de la mémoire implicite et proposition d'une méthodologie, working paper 287, April, DMSP Research Centre, University of Paris IX Dauphine.
49.
FontaineI. (2002a), Étude des réponses mémorielles et attitudinales des spectateurs exposés aux placements de marques dans les films, Doctoral dissertation, University of Paris IX Dauphine.
50.
FontaineI. (2002b), Impact persuasif du rôle accordé aux marques au sein de supports non publicitaires: le cas du placement de marques dans les films, Proceedings of the 18th Congrès de l'Association Française du Marketing, Lille, 23-24 May, 177–200.
51.
FontaineI. (2006), Étude du changement d'attitude pour les marques placées dans les films: Persuasion ou effet d'exposition ?, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 21, 1, 1–18.
52.
FreemanH. (2007), And the Oscar goes to… a suitcase?, The Guardian, November 23rd.
53.
FriestadM. and WrightP. (1994), The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts, Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1, 1–31.
54.
FriestadM. and WrightP. (1995), The persuasion knowledge model: Lay people's and research's beliefs about the psychology of persuasion, Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 1, 62–74.
55.
GalicianM.L. (2004), A rising independent filmmaker argues for product placement: An interview with Samuel A. Turcotte, Journal of Promotion Management, 10, 1/2, 223–226.
56.
GalicianM.L. and BourdeauP.G. (2004), The evolution of product placements in Hollywood cinema: Embedding high-involvement “heroic” brand image, Journal of Promotion Management, 10, 1/2, 15–36.
57.
GarzaS.D. and CallisonC. (2005), The influence of movie genre on audience reaction to product placement, paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Conference, Advertising Division, 9–13 August, San Antonio, TX.
58.
GouldS.J., GuptaP.B. and Grabner-KraüterS. (2000), Product placements in movies: A cross-cultural analysis of Austrian, French and American consumers' attitudes toward this emerging, international promotional medium, Journal of Advertising, 29, 4, 41–58.
59.
GrégoryP. (1993), Notes sur la persuasion subliminale: Quelques acquis de la recherche marketing pour éclairer un mythe, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 8, 3, 79–93.
60.
GreenwaldA.G. (1992), New look 3: Unconscious cognition reclaimed, American Psychologist, 47, 6, 766–779.
61.
GreenwaldA.G., SpangenbergE.R., PratkanisA.R. and EskenaziJ. (1991), Double-blind tests of subliminal self-help audio tapes, Psychological Science, 2, 2, 119–122.
62.
GuptaP.B. and GouldS.J. (1997), Consumers' perceptions of the ethics and acceptability of product placements in movies: Product category and individual differences, Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 19, 1, 37–50.
63.
GuptaP.B. and GouldS.J. (2007), Recall of products placed as prizes versus commercials in game show, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 20, 1, 43–53.
64.
GuptaP.B. and LordK.R. (1998), Product placement in movies: The effect of prominence and mode on audience recall, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 20, 1, 48–59.
65.
HackleyC. and TiwsakulR.A. (2006), Entertainment marketing and experiential consumption, Journal of Marketing Communications, 12, 1, 63–75.
66.
HackleyC., TiwsakulR.A. and PreussL. (2008), An ethical evaluation of product placement: A deceptive practice?, Business Ethics: A European Review, 17, 2, 109–120.
67.
Henderson BrittS. (1969), Are so-called successful advertising campaigns really successful?, Journal of Advertising Research, 9, 2, 3–9.
68.
HendonD.W. (1973), How mechanical factors affect ad perception, Journal of Advertising Research, 13, 4, 39–45.
69.
HudsonS. and HudsonD. (2006), Branded entertainment: A new advertising technique or product placement in disguise?, Journal of Marketing Management, 22, 5/6, 489–504.
70.
JinC. and VillegasJ. (2007), The effect of the placement of the product in film: Consumers' emotional responses to humorous stimuli and prior brand evaluation, Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 15, 4, 244–255.
71.
JolibertA. and Didellon-CarsanaL. (2000), La mesure non hiérarchique de la structure mémorielle des connaissances, Décisions Marketing, 21, 89–97.
72.
JolibertA. and JourdanP. (2006), Marketing Research: méthodes de recherche et d'études en marketing, Paris, Dunod, 158.
73.
KammounM. (2008), Efficacité de la publicité, un état de l'art, La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 229, 111–119.
74.
KarrhJ.A. (1995), Brand placements in feature films: the practitioners' view, in MaddenC. S. (Ed.), proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising, Hankamer University of Baylor, School of Business, Waco, TX, 182–188.
75.
KarrhJ.A. (1998), Brand placement: A review, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 20, 2, 31–49.
76.
KarrhJ.A., Brittain McKeeK. and PardunC.J. (2003), Practitioners' evolving views on product placement effectiveness, Journal of Advertising Research, 43, 2, 138–149.
77.
KishoreA. (2003), The death of the 30-second commercial, August, rapport du Yankee Group Media & Entertainment Strategies, Boston, MA.
78.
KriderR.E. (2006), Research opportunities at the movies, Marketing Science, 25, 6, 662–664.
79.
KrugmanH.E. (1965), The impact of television advertising: Learning without involvement, The Public Opinion Quaterly, 29, 3, 349–356.
80.
KrugmanH.E. (1977), Memory without recall, exposure without perception, Journal of Advertising Research, 17, 4, 7–12.
81.
LawS. and BraunK. (2000), I'll have what she's having: Gauging the impact of product placements on viewers, Psychology & Marketing, 17, 12, 1059–1075.
82.
LawS. and Braun-La TourK.A. (2004), Product placement: How to measure their impact, in ShrumL.J. (Ed.), The psychology of entertainment, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 63–78.
83.
LeeA.Y. (2002), Effects of implicit memory on memory-based versus stimulus-based brand choice, Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 4, 440–454.
84.
LehuJ.-M. and BressoudE. (2008), Effectiveness of brand placement: New insights about viewers, Journal of Business Research, 61, 10, 1083–1090.
85.
LehuJ.-M. (2005a), Le placement de marques au cinéma, proposition de la localisation du placement à l'écran comme nouveau facteur d'efficacité potentielle, Décisions Marketing, 37, 17–31.
86.
LehuJ.-M. (2005b), Le placement de produits au cinéma: Hiérarchie des critères d'utilisation ou hiérarchie des étapes? Une étude exploratoire qualitative auprès d'agents professionnels anglo-saxons, paper presented at the 4th Congrès des Tendances marketing, Paris, 21-22 January.
87.
LehuJ.-M. (2006), La publicité est dans le film, Paris, Éditions d'Organisation.
88.
LindstromM. (2008), buy.ology, New York, NY, Doubleday.
89.
LiuS.S. and StoutP.A. (1987), Effects of message modality and appeal on advertising acceptance, Psychology & Marketing, 4, 3, 167–187.
90.
LewickiP. (1986), Nonconscious social information processing, Orlando, Academic Press.
91.
LynchJ.G.Jr. (1982), On the external validity of experiments in consumer research, Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 3, 225–239.
92.
LynchJ.G.Jr. (1999), Theory and external validity, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 3, 367–376.
93.
MackieD.E. and AsuncionA.G. (1990), On-line and memory-based modification of attitudes: Determinants of message recall-attitude change correspondence, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1, 5–16.
94.
MayerR.E. and MorenoR. (1998), A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory, Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 2, 312–320.
95.
McGaughJ.L. (1966), Time-dependent processes in memory storage, Science, 153, 1351–1358.
96.
McGuireW.J. (1976), Some internal psychological factors influencing consumer choice, Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 4, 302–319.
97.
McKechnieS.A. and ZhouJ. (2003), Product placement in movies: A comparison of Chinese and American consumers' attitudes, International Journal of Advertising, 22, 3, 349–374.
98.
Meyers-LevyJ. and MalaviyaP. (1999), Consumers' processing of persuasive advertisements: An integrative framework of persuasion theories, Journal of Marketing, 63, 4, 45–60.
99.
MooreR.S., StammerjohanC.A. and CoulterR.A. (2005), Banner advertiser-website context congruity and color effects on attention and attitudes, Journal of Advertising, 34, 2, 71–84.
100.
MortonC.R. and FriedmanM. (2002), “I saw it in the movies”: Exploring the link between product placement beliefs and reported usage behavior, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 24, 2, 33–40.
101.
NebenzahlI.D. and SecundaE. (1993), Consumer's attitudes toward product placement in movies, International Journal of Advertising, 12, 1, 1–11.
102.
NelsonR.A. (2004), A product placement resource guide: Recommended Publications and Websites, Journal of Promotion Management, 10, 1/2, 259–267.
103.
NelsonM.R. (2008), The hidden persuaders: Then and now, Journal of Advertising, 37, 1, 113–126.
104.
NelsonM.R. and DevathanN. (2006), Brand placements Bollywood style, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5, 3, 211–221.
105.
OngB.S. and MeriD. (1994), Should product placement in movies be banned?, Journal of Promotion Management, 2, 2/4, 159–175.
106.
PaivioA. (1978), A dual coding approach to perception and cognition, in PickH.I. and SaltzmanE. (Eds.), Modes of perceiving and processing information, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 39–51.
107.
PardunC.J. and McKeeK.B. (1999), Product placements as public relations: An exploratory study of the role of the public relations firm, Public Relations Reviews, 25, 4, 481–493.
108.
PetersonR.A. (2001), On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis, Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 3, 450–61.
109.
PettyR.E. and CacioppoJ.T. (1979), Issue-involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 10, 1915–1926.
110.
PietersR. and WedelM. (2004), Attention capture and transfer in advertising: Brand, pictorial, and text-size effects, Journal of Marketing, 68, 2, 36–50.
111.
PQ Media (2005), Product placement spending in media 2005 — History, analysis & forecast, 1974 to 2009, Stamford, CT, PQ Media LLC.
112.
PQ Media (2007), PQ Media market analysis finds global product placement spending grew 37% in 2006, Stamford, CT, PQ Media LLC, March.
113.
PratkanisA.R. and AronsonE. (1992), The age of propaganda: the everyday use and abuse of persuasion, New York, WH Freeman.
114.
RosenD.L. and SinghS.N. (1992), An investigation of the subliminal embed effect on multiple measures of advertising, Psychology & Marketing, 9, 2, 157–173.
115.
RosenzweigP. (2008), Common errors in marketing research - and how to fix them, Marketing Research, 20, 3, 6–12.
116.
RussellC.A. (1998), Toward a framework of product placement: Theoretical propositions, Advances in Consumer Research, 25, 1, 357–362.
117.
RussellC.A. (2002), Investigating the effectiveness of product placements in television shows: The role of modality and plot connection congruence on brand memory and attitude, Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 3, 306–318.
118.
RussellC.A. and BelchM. (2005), A managerial investigation into the product placement industry, Journal of Advertising Research, 45, 1, 73–92.
119.
RussellC.A. and SternB.B. (2006), Consumers, characters, and products, Journal of Advertising, 35, 1, 7–21.
120.
SchejterA.M. (2004), Product placement as an international practice: moral, legal, regulatory and trade implications, paper presented at the 32nd Annual Telecommunications Policy and Research Conference, October, The National Center for Technology and the Law, George Mason University School of Law, Arligton, VA.
121.
SchmollN.M., HaferJ., HiltM. and ReillyH. (2006), Baby boomers' attitudes towards product placements, Journal of Current Issues and research in Advertising, 28, 2, 33–53.
122.
SchumacherP. and HelmigB. (2007), The effect of executional variables of product placement on conscious and non-conscious brand processing and its consequences on brand evaluation, paper presented at the 36th European Marketing Academy Conference, Reykjavik, 22-25 May.
123.
SteortzE.M. (1987), The cost efficiency and communication effects associated with brand name exposure within motion pictures, Master's thesis, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
124.
SévilleM. (2006), Doit-on renoncer à l'expérimentation en stratégie ?, paper presented at the 15th Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique (AIMS), Annecy — Geneva, 13-16 June.
TheusK.T. (2006), Subliminal advertising and the psychology of processing unconscious stimuli: Review of research, Psychology & Marketing, 11, 3, 271–290.
127.
TiwsakulR. and HackleyC. (2005), Ethics and regulation of contemporary marketing communication practices: an exploration of the perceptions of UK-based consumers towards the ethical issues raised by product placement in British TV shows, working paper, SoM05502, School of Management, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey.
128.
TseA.C.B. and LeeR.P.W. (2001), Zapping behavior during commercial breaks, Journal of Advertising Research, 41, 3, 25–29.
129.
TurcotteS.A. (1995), Gimme a Bud! The feature film product placement industry, Master's thesis, University of Texas at Austin, TX.
130.
Van der WaldtD.L.R., Du ToitL.S. and RedelinghuysR. (2007), Does branded product placement in film enhance realism and product recognition by consumers?, African Journal of Business Management, 1, 2, 19–25.
131.
VollmersS. and MizerskiR. (1994), A review and investigation into the effectiveness of product placements in films, in KingK.W. (Ed.), proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising, Athens, GA, 97–102.
132.
WeiM.-L., FischerE. and MainK.J. (2008), An examination of the effects of activating persuasion knowledge on consumer response to brands engaging in covert marketing, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 27, 1, 34–44.
133.
WhittleseaB.W.A. and PriceJ.R. (2001), Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect, Memory & Cognition, 29, 2, 234–246.
134.
WinerR.S. (1999), Experimentation in the 21st century: The importance of external validity, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 3, 349–358.
