This study examines the interplay of product development strategy, knowledge utilization, and product innovation performance in the context of Chinese subsidiaries of multinational companies. When firms strive to develop highly innovative products (breakthrough focus), the amount of resources allocated has a U-shaped relationship to subsequent product innovation performance (i.e., market rewards of new products). When the aim of product development activity is to reinforce and maintain moderately innovative products (platform focus), increased resource allocation shows a positive relationship to product innovation performance. The amount of resources allocated to minor revisions (incremental focus) shows no significant relationship to product innovation performance. Knowledge utilization is an important predictor of the benefits of developing highly and moderately innovative products. Moreover, it helps to mitigate the drawbacks of a breakthrough focus and strengthens the positive impact of a platform focus.
AlmeidaPaul, and PheneAnupama (2004), “Subsidiaries and Knowledge Creation: The Influence of the MNC and Host Country on Innovation,”Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9), 847–64.
2.
AmitRaphael, and SchoemakerPaul J.H. (1993), “Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent,”Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33–45.
3.
AnderssonUlf, ForsgrenMats, and HolmUlf (2002), “The Strategic Impact of External Networks: Subsidiary Performance and Competence Development in the Multinational Corporation,”Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 979–96.
4.
ScotArmstrong J., and OvertonTerry S. (1977), “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys,”Journal of Marketing Research, 24(August), 396–402.
5.
BanburyCatherine M., and MitchellWill (1995), “The Effect of Introducing Important Incremental Innovations on Market Share and Business Survival,”Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 161–82.
6.
BarneyJay (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,”Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
7.
BaronReuben M., and KennyDavid A. (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–82.
8.
BartlettChristopher A., and GhoshalSumantra (1989), Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
9.
BennerMarry J., and TushmanMichael L. (2003), “Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited,”Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–56.
10.
BergkvistLars, and RossiterJohn R. (2007), “The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item Versus Single-Item Measures of the Same Constructs,”Journal of Marketing Research, 44(May), 175–84.
11.
BirkinshawJulian (1996), “How Multinational Subsidiary Mandates Are Gained and Lost,”Journal of International Business Studies, 27(3), 467–95.
12.
BondEdward U., and HoustonMark B. (2003), “Barriers to Matching New Technologies and Market Opportunities in Established Firms,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 120–35.
13.
BrockmanBeverly K., and MorganRobert M. (2003), “The Role of Existing Knowledge in New Product Innovativeness and Performance,”Decision Sciences, 34(2), 385–419.
14.
BrownShona L., and EisenhardtKathleen M. (1995), “Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions,”Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343–79.
15.
BurtRonald S. (1997), “The Contingent Value of Social Capital,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339–65.
16.
ByrneBarbara M. (2001), Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17.
CalantoneRoger J., ChanKwong, and CuiAnna S. (2006), “Decomposing Product Innovativeness and Its Effects on New Product Success,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(5), 408–421.
18.
CalantoneRoger J., and Di BenedettoAnthony (1988), “An Integrative Model of the New Product Development Process: An Empirical Validation,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5(3), 201–216.
19.
CantwellJohn, and MudambiRam (2004), “Multinational Enterprises and Competence-Creating Knowledge Flows: A Theoretical Analysis,” in Knowledge Flows, Governance and Multinational Enterprise, MahnkeVolker, and PedersenTorben, eds. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 38–60.
20.
CavesRichard E. (1996), Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis.New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
ChesbroughHenry (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
22.
CohenJacob, and CohenPatricia (1983), Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
CooperRobert G. (1979), “Identifying Industrial New Product Success: Project Newprod,”Industrial Marketing Management, 8(April), 124–35.
24.
CooperRobert G., and KleinschmidtElko J. (1987), “New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers?”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4(September), 169–84.
25.
CooperRobert G., and KleinschmidtElko J. (1995), “Benchmarking the Firm's Critical Success Factors in New Product Development,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(5), 374–91.
26.
DanneelsErwin, and KleinschmidtElko J. (2001), “Product Innovativeness from the Firm's Perspective: Its Dimensions and Their Relation with Project Selection and Performance,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(6), 357–73.
27.
DoughertyDeborah (1992), “Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms,”Organization Science, 3(2), 179–202.
28.
DrazinRobert, and Van de VenAndrew H. (1985), “Alternative Forms of Fit in Contingency Theory,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(4), 514–40.
29.
ErnstHolger (2002), “Success Factors of New Product Development: A Review of the Empirical Literature,”International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(1), 1–40.
30.
ForsgrenMats, and PedersonTorben (1998), “Centers of Excellence in Multinational Companies: The Case of Denmark,” in Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development, BirkinshawJulian, and HoodNeil, eds. London: MacMillan, 141–61.
31.
FossNicolai J., and PedersenTorben (2002), “Transferring Knowledge in MNCs: The Role of Sources of Subsidiary Knowledge and Organizational Context,”Journal of International Management, 8(1), 49–67.
GolderPeter N., and TellisGerard J. (1993), “Pioneer Advantage: Marketing Logic or Marketing Legend?”Journal of Marketing Research, 30(May), 158–71.
34.
GriffinAbbie (1997), “PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(6), 429–58.
35.
GuillénMauro F. (2003), “Experience, Imitation, and the Sequence of Foreign Entry: Wholly Owned and Joint-Venture Manufacturing by South Korean Firms and Business Groups in China, 1987–1995,”Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2), 185–98.
36.
GuptaAnil K., and GovindarajanVijay (1991), “Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations,”Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 768–93.
37.
HairJoseph F., BlackWilliam C., BabinBarry J., AndersonRolph E., and TathamRonald L. (2006), Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
38.
HansenMorten T., MorsMarie Louise, and LøvåsBjørn (2005), “Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: Multiple Networks, Multiple Phases,”Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 776–93.
39.
HauserJohn, TellisGerard J., and GriffinAbbie (2006), “Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science,”Marketing Science, 25(6), 687–717.
40.
HelfatConstance E., and RaubitschekRuth S. (2000), “Product Sequencing: Co-Evolution of Knowledge, Capabilities and Products,”Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 961–79.
41.
HenardDavid H., and SzymanskiDavid M. (2001), “Why Some New Products Are More Successful Than Others,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38(August), 362–75.
42.
HurleyRobert F., and TomasG., HultM. (1998), “Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination,”Journal of Marketing, 62(July), 42–54.
43.
HymerStephen H. (1976), The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44.
ImSubin, NakataCheryl, ParkHeungsoo, and HaYoung-Won (2003), “Determinants of Korean and Japanese New Product Performance: An Interrelational and Process View,”Journal of International Marketing, 11(4), 81–113.
45.
InkpenAndrew C., and TsangEric W.K. (2005), “Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer,”Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146–65.
46.
JamesLawrence R., MulaikStanley A., and BrettJeamme M. (2006), “A Tale of Two Methods,”Organization Research Methods, 9(2), 233–44.
47.
KleinschmidtElko J., and CooperRobert G. (1991), “The Impact of Product Innovativeness on Performance,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(4), 240–51.
48.
KlineRex B. (1998), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling.New York: The Guilford Press.
49.
KotabeMasaaki, Dunlap-HinklerDenise, ParenteRonaldo, and MishraHarsh A. (2007), “Determinants of Cross-National Knowledge Transfer and Its Effect on Firm Innovation,”Journal of International Business Studies, 38(2), 259–82.
50.
KuemmerleWalter T.J. (1999), “The Drivers of Foreign Direct Investment into Research and Development: An Empirical Investigation,”Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1), 1–24.
51.
KuemmerleWalter T.J. (2002), “Home Base and Knowledge Management in International Ventures,”Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 99–122.
52.
LaursenKeld, and SalterAmmon (2006), “Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among U.K. Manufacturing Firms,”Strategy Management Journal, 27(November), 131–50.
53.
LiHaiyang, and Atuahene-GimaKwaku (2001), “Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Ventures in China,”Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123–35.
54.
LiJiatao, and YueDeborah R. (2005), “Managing Global Research and Development in China: Patterns of R&D Configuration and Evolution,”Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(3), 317–37.
55.
LuoYadong, and ParkSeung Ho (2001), “Strategic Alignment and Performance of Market-Seeking MNCs in China,”Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 141–55.
56.
LuoYadong, and PengMike W. (1999), “Learning to Compete in a Transition Economy: Experience, Environment, and Performance,”Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 269–95.
57.
MakinoShiege, and InkpenAndrew C. (2003), “Knowledge Seeking FDI and Learning Across Borders,” in The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, Easterby-SmithMark, and LylesMarjorie A., eds. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 233–52.
58.
MarchJames G. (1991), “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,”Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
59.
McDermottChristopher M., and O'ConnorGina Colarelli (2002), “Managing Radical Innovation: An Overview of Emergent Strategy Issues,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(6), 424–39.
60.
McEvilySusan K., and ChakravarthyBala (2002), “The Persistence of Knowledge-Based Advantage: An Empirical Test for Product Performance and Technological Knowledge,”Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), 285–305.
61.
MeyerMarc H., and RobertsEdward B. (1986), “New Product Strategy in Small Technology-Based Firms: A Pilot Study,”Management Science, 32(7), 706–711.
MishraSanjay, KimDongwook, and LeeDae Hoon (1996), “Factors Affecting New Product Success: Cross-Country Comparisons,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(6), 530–50.
64.
MooreKarl, and BirkinshawJulian (1998), “Managing Knowledge in Global Service Firms: Centers of Excellence,”Academy Management Executive, 12(4), 81–92.
65.
MudambiRam (2002), “Knowledge Management in Multinational Firms,”Journal of International Management, 8(1), 1–9.
66.
MurrayJanet Y., KotabeMasaaki, and ZhouJoe Nan (2005), “Strategic Alliance-Based Sourcing and Market Performance: Evidence from Foreign Firms Operating in China,”Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2), 187–208.
67.
NunnallyJum C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2d ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
68.
OlsonEric M., WalkerOrville C., and RuekertRobert W. (1995), “Organizing for Effective New Product Development: The Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness,”Journal of Marketing, 59(January), 48–62.
69.
PearceRobert (1999), “The Evolution of Technology in Multinational Enterprises: The Role of Creative Subsidiaries,”International Business Review, 8(2), 125–48.
70.
PheneAnupama, and AlmeidaPaul (2008), “Innovation in Multinational Subsidiaries: The Role of Knowledge Assimilation and Subsidiary Capabilities,”Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 901–919.
71.
PodsakoffPhilip M., and OrganDennis W. (1986), “Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects,”Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–44.
72.
RoijakkersN., and HagedoornJ. (2006), “Inter-Firm R&D Partnering in Pharmaceutical Biotechnology Since 1975: Trends, Patterns, and Networks,”Research Policy, 35(3), 431–46.
73.
SchulzMartin (2001), “The Uncertain Relevance of Newness: Organizational Learning and Knowledge Flows,”Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 661–82.
74.
SongMichael, and Montoya-WeissMitzi M. (1998), “Critical Development Activities for Really New Versus Incremental Products,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(2), 124–35.
75.
SongMichael, van der BijHans, and WeggemanMathieu (2005), “Determinants of the Level of Knowledge Application: A Knowledge-Based and Information-Processing Perspective,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(5), 430–44.
76.
SorescuAlina B., ChandyRajesh K., and PrabhuJaideep C. (2003), “Sources and Financial Consequences of Radical Innovation: Insights from Pharmaceuticals,”Journal of Marketing, 67(October), 82–102.
77.
SubramaniamMohan, and VenkatramanN. (2001), “Determinants of Transnational New Product Development Capability: Testing the Influence of Transferring and Deploying Tacit Overseas Knowledge,”Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 359–78.
78.
SzymanskiDavid M., KroffMichael W., and TroyLisa C. (2007), “Innovativeness and New Product Success: Insights from the Cumulative Evidence,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 35–52.
79.
UzziBrian (1997), “Social Structure and Competition in Inter-firm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 35–67.
80.
VenkatramanN. (1989), “The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward a Verbal and Statistical Correspondence,”Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423–44.
81.
VernonRaymond (1966), “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(May), 190–207.
82.
WheelwrightSteven C., and ClarkKim B. (1992), “Creating Project Plans to Focus Product Development,”Harvard Business Review, 70(2), 70–82.
83.
WheelwrightSteven C., and SasserW. EarlJr. (1989), “The New Product Development Map,”Harvard Business Review, 67(3), 112–23.
84.
YalcinkayaGoksel, CalantoneRoger J., and GriffithDavid A. (2007), “An Examination of Exploration and Exploitation Capabilities: Implications for Product Innovation and Market Performance,”Journal of International Marketing, 15(4), 63–93.
85.
Yli-RenkoHelena, AutioErkko, and SapienzaHarry J. (2001), “Social Capital, Knowledge Acquisition, and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology-Based Firms,”Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 587–613.
86.
ZaheerSrilata (1995), “Overcoming the Liability of Foreignness,”Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–63.
87.
ZanderIvo (1999), “How Do You Mean Global? An Empirical Investigation of Innovation Networks in the Multinational Corporations,”Research Policy, 28(2-3), 195–213.
88.
ZhangYan, LiHaiyang, HittMichael A., and CuiGeng (2007), “R&D Intensity and International Joint Venture Performance in an Emerging Market: Moderating Effects of Market Focus and Ownership Structure,”Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6), 944–60.
89.
ZhouKevin Zheng, YimChi Kin, and TseDavid K. (2005), “The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations,”Journal of Marketing, 69(April), 42–60.
