The Candidate and Officer Personnel Survey (COPS) (Guller & Guller, 2003) was developed as a predictor of job performance in public safety candidates. Three studies were conducted to collect normative data for the COPS, to evaluate the reliability of the scales, and to investigate the concurrent validity of the instrument. Reliability coefficients were generally fair to excellent. Concurrent validity was quite good for the discrimination of promotional versus problematic officers. The results suggest the COPS's potential as a predictor of public safety officers' performance.
BarrettG. V.PolomskyM. D.McDanielM. A. (1999). Selection tests for firefighters: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 507–513.
2.
ButcherJ. N.DahlstromW. G.GrahamJ. R.TellegenA.KaemmerB. (1989). MMPI-2: Manual for administering and scoring. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
3.
CochraneR. E.TettR. P.VandecreekL. (2003). Psychological testing and the selection of police officers: A national survey. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 511–537.
4.
FischlerG. L. (2004). Identifying psychological predictors of police officer integrity problems. Washington, DC: Community Oriented Policing Services Office of the United States Department of Justice.
5.
FleissJ. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.
GullerM. (2004). Predicting performance of law enforcement personnel using the Candidate and Officer Personnel Survey and other psychological measures. West Orange, NJ: Seton Hall University.
8.
GullerI. B.GullerM. (2003). C.O.P.S.: Candidate and Officer Personnel Survey technical manual. Oakland, NJ: Institute for Forensic Psychology.
9.
HeyerT. (1998). A follow-up study of the prediction of police officer performance on psychological evaluation variables. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota School of Professional Psychology.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
12.
LoughJ.RyanM. (2005). Psychological profiling of Australian police officers: An examination of post-selection performance. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 8, 15–23.
13.
LoughJ.RyanM. (2006). Psychological profiling of Australian police officers: A longitudinal examination of post-selection performance. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 8, 143–152.
14.
LoughJ.WaldE.ByrneK.WalkerG. (2007). The impact of psychological profiling of Australian correctional officers. Corrections Compendium, 32(4), 1–6.
15.
McGrathR. E.MeyerG. J. (2006). When effect sizes disagree: The case of r and d. Psychological Methods, 11, 386–401.
16.
OnesD. S.ViswesvaranC.DilchertS. (2005). Cognitive ability in selection decisions. In: WilhelmO.EngleR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence (pp. 431–468). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
VarelaJ. G.BoccacciniM. T.ScoginF.StumpJ.CaputoA. (2004). Personality testing in law enforcement employment settings: A meta-analytic review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 649–675.
18.
ZacharyR. A. (2000). Shipley Institute of Living Scale: Revised manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
