Abstract
This article comments on the chapter ‘Proof and uncertainty’ in Allan Beever's Rediscovering the law of negligence, from the stand***point of an evidence scholar interested in ‘The New Evidence Scholarship’. The article discusses the nature of uncertainty and probability and their application in contested negligence cases. While the author agrees with Beever's main thrust, this article provides a gloss on Beever's writing, ironing out some ambiguities, expanding some points and correcting some errors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.