The Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA) requires certain projects with federal government triggers to undergo an environmental assessment before receiving federal government approval. On request under CEAA, Health Canada provides advice on the health effects of noise to responsible authorities for wind turbine projects. The advice that Health Canada provides on the health effects of noise is generally based only on well-accepted scientific evidence for a link between noise exposure and health. For quiet rural areas, in which annoyance reactions towards intruding noise may be augmented, this paper proposes noise mitigation if predicted wind turbine noise levels exceed 45 dBA at noise sensitive receptors. In this proposal, a cautious approach is adopted by using predicted noise levels that are evaluated at the wind speed that produces the highest wind turbine noise, and background noise is evaluated in calm winds. This accounts for sheltering by obstructions. Wind speed gradient effects related to stable atmospheric conditions are also accounted for with this approach. The proposal is based on predicted project-noise related changes in long-term high annoyance, rattle and sleep disturbance. Noise mitigation for wind turbine construction noise is proposed based on potential for expectation of complaints.
Alberta Energy Utilities Board (2007). “Directive 038 Noise Control” (revised edition February 16, 2007).
2.
ANSI (1995). “Criteria for evaluating room noise,” ANSI S12.2-1995 (R1999).
3.
BothaP. (2005). “The use of 10 m wind speed measurements in the assessment of wind farm developments,”INCE/Europe Proc. Wind Turbine Noise Perspectives for Control, Berlin.
4.
British Columbia Ministry of Transportation and Highways (1993). “Revised policy for mitigating the effects of traffic noise from freeways and expressways,” 92-M63- 1.
5.
British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture and Lands (2007). “Land use operational policy, wind power projects on Crown land,” effective Oct 2005, amended Dec 2007.
6.
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (2003). “Reference Guide. Determining whether a project is likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects”.
7.
Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (1981). “Road and Rail Noise: Effects on Housing,” NH15–27.
Department of Trade & Industry (1996). “The asessment and rating of noise from windfarms,” ETSU R-97 for the DTI (pt 5, pg 39). (The Department of Trade & Industry was replaced by the Department of Business Enterprise & Regulartory Reform, BERR in 2007.
10.
Environmental News Service (2007). “Global wind power generate record year in 2006,”Environmental News Service.
11.
FidellS.PearsonsK. L., and SneddonM. (2002). Relationship between low-frequency aircraft noise and annoyance due to rattle and vibration,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am.111, 1743–1750
12.
FieldsJ. M. (1993). “Effect of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am.93, 2753–2763
13.
HansenC.SaurenmanH.TowersD.AndersonG.KiumuraY., and RobertW. (2006). “Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment,” FTA-VA-90-1003-06 May 1-274
14.
McKenzieHayes (2006). “The measurement of low frequency noise at three UK wind farms,” Contract No W/45/00656/00/00 DTI URN No 06/1412.
15.
Health Canada (1999). “Canadian Handbook on Health Impact Assessment,”.
ISO (1996). “Acoustics - Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors - Part 2: General method of calculation,” ISO 9613–2.
18.
ISO (2003). “Acoustics-Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise-Part 1: Basic quantities and assessment procedures,” ISO 1996–1: 2003(E).
19.
KryterK. D. (1982). “Community Annoyance from Aircraft and Ground Vehicle Noise,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am.72, 1222.
20.
LeventhallH. G. (2006). “Infrasound from wind turbines-fact, fiction or deception,”Canadian Acoustics34, 29–34.
21.
Manitoba Environment (1992). “Guidelines for sound pollution, prepared by Environmental Management Division, Manitoba Environment.”
22.
MiedemaH. M. and OudshoornC. G. (2001). “Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals,”Environ. Health Perspect. 109, 409–416.
23.
MiedemaH. M. and VosH. (1998). “Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am.104, 3432–3445.
24.
Ministère du Développement durable, de l'Environnement et des Parcs (2006). “Note d'instructions 98-01 sur le bruit du MDDEP” (révisée en date du 9 juin 2006).
25.
MoorhouseA.HayesM.von HunerbeinS.PiperB., and AdamsM. (2007). “Research into Aerodynamic Modulation of Wind Turbine Noise: Final report,”University of Salford, Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Contract no NANR233.
26.
Natural Resources Canada (2007). “ecoENERGY for Renewable Power,”ecoENERGY for Renewable Power.
27.
New Zealand Standard (NZS 6808: 1998) “Acoustics- The assessment and measurement of sound from wind turbine generators.”
28.
Nova Scotia Environment and Labour (1990). “Guidelines for Environmental Noise Measurement and Assessment.”
29.
OhrstromE. (1997). “Effects of exposure to railway noise. A comparison between areas with and without vibration,”Journal of Sound and Vibration205, 555–560.
30.
Ontario Ministry of the Environment (1978). “Model Municipal Noise Control ByLaw, Final Report,”.
31.
Ontario Ministry of the Environment (1997). “Noise Assessment Criteria in Land Use Planning Publication LU-131,” LU-131.
32.
Ontario Ministry of the Environment (2004). “Interpretation for applying MOE NPC technical publications to wind turbine generators”, Report No. 4709e.
33.
PaulsenR. and KastkaJ. (1995). “Effects of combined noise and vibration on annoyance,”Journal of Sound and Vibration181, 295–314.
34.
PedersenE. and HalmstadH.I. (2003) Noise annoyance from wind turbines- A review. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Report 5308.
35.
PedersenE. and WayeK.P. (2007). “Wind turbine noise, annoyance and self-reported health and wellbeing in different living environments,”Occup. Environ. Med.64, 480–486.
36.
PedersenE. and WayeK. P. (2004). “Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise—a dose-response relationship,”J Acoust. Soc Am. 116, 3460–3470.
37.
SalomonsE. M.van den BergF. H. A., and BrackenhoffH. E. A. (1994). “Long-term average sound transfer through the atmosphere: Predictions based on meteorological statistics and numerical computations of sound propagation,”Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on long Range Sound Propagation (Ottawa), 209–228.
38.
SchomerP. D. (2002). “On normalizing DNL to provide better correlation with response,”Sound and Vibration Magazine14–23.
39.
SchomerP. D. (2004). “The importance of proper integration of and emphasis on the low-frequency sound energies for environmental noise assessment,”Noise Control Engineering52, 26–39.
40.
SchomerP. D. and AverbuchA. (1989). “Indoor human response to blast sounds that generate rattles,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am.86, 665–673.
41.
SchomerP. D. and NeathammerR. D. (1987). “The role of helicopter noise-induced vibration and rattle in human response,”J Acoust. Soc Am. 81, 966–976.
42.
South Australia Environmental Protection Agency (2007), “Wind farms Environmental noise guidelines (interim)”.
43.
Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (2001). “Ljud fran vindkraftverk” (“Noise from wind turbines”), Report 6241, Stockholm, Sweden.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1974). “Information on levels of environmental noise requisite to protect public health and welfare with an adequate margin of safety,” 550/9-74-004, 1-G15.
46.
van den BergG. (2004). “Effects of the wind profile at night on wind turbine sound,”Journal of Sound and Vibration277, 955–970.
