The three-dimensional translational multi-input/output relative transmissibility and the transmissibility of supine humans during transportation were introduced in this work and were compared with the single-axis input/output condition. Eight healthy subjects were tested under multi-axis input/output whole-body vibration of white noise random signals with frequency content of 0.5–20 Hz and vibration magnitude of 1 m/s2 RMS applied at the platform level, considering three immobilization conditions: rigid-platform, litter-board, and litter-board-collar. The results showed the diagonal components of the multi-axis input/out transmissibility and relative transmissibility to be considerably larger than their out-of-diagonal components. Significant correlations (R2 > 0.93) were found between the diagonal components of the transmissibility of the multi-axis input/output and those of the individual single-axis input/output whole-body vibrations; however, weaker correlation (R2 > 0.11) was shown between their cross-axis components.
KangD.G. and LehmanR.A.Jr, Spine immobilization: Prehospitalization to final destination, Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances, 2011, 20(1), 2–7.
2.
AlbertiE.ChiappaD.MoschioniG.SagginB. and TarabiniM., Whole body vibration in mountain-rescue operations, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2006, 298(3), 580–593.
3.
SilbergleitR.DedrickD.K.PapeJ. and BurneyR.E., Forces acting during air and ground transport on patients stabilized by standard immobilization techniques, Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1991, 20(8), 875–877.
4.
National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians (US), Pre-Hospital Trauma Life Support Committee, and American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, PHTLS: Basic and advanced prehospital trauma life support, Military 5th ed., Mosby Inc., St. Louis, Missouri, 2005.
5.
ShadeB.RothenbergM.WertzE.JonesS. and CollinsT., EMT intermediate textbook, Mosby Inc., Missouri, 2002.
6.
PerryS.D.McLellanB.McIlroyW.E.MakiB.E.SchwartzM. and FernieG.R., The efficacy of head immobilization techniques during simulated vehicle motion, Spine, 1999, 24(17), 1839–1844.
7.
AhnH.SinghJ.NathensA.MacDonaldR.D.TraversA.TallonJ.FehlingsM.G.YeeA., Pre-Hospital care management of a potential spinal cord injured patient: A systematic review of the literature and evidence-based guidelines, Journal of Neurotrauma, 2011, 28, 1341–1361, DOI: 10.1089= neu.2009.1168
8.
HauswaldM.HsuM.StockoffC., Maximizing comfort and minimizing ischemia: A comparison of four methods of spinal immobilization. Prehosp. Emerg. Care, 2000, 4, 250–252.
9.
MainP.W.LovellM.E., A review of seven support surfaces with emphasis on their protection of the spinally injured. J. Accident Emerg. Med.1996, 13, 34–37.
10.
HuangY. and GriffinM.J., Nonlinear dual-axis biodynamic response of the semi-supine human body during longitudinal horizontal whole-body vibration, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2008, 312(1), 273–295.
11.
HuangY. and GriffinM.J., Nonlinear dual-axis biodynamic response of the semi-supine human body during vertical whole-body vibration, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2008, 312(1), 296–315.
12.
HuangY. and GriffinM.J., Nonlinearity in apparent mass and transmissibility of the supine human body during vertical whole-body vibration, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2009, 324(1), 429–452.
13.
MansfieldN.J. and MaedaS., The apparent mass of the seated human exposed to single-axis and multi-axis whole-body vibration, Journal of Biomechanics, 2007, 40(11), 2543–2551.
14.
MandapuramS.C.RakhejaS.MaS.DemontR.G. and BoileauP.E., Influence of back support conditions on the apparent mass of seated occupants under horizontal vibration, Industrial Health, 2005, 43(3), 421–435.
15.
PaddanG.S. and GriffinM.J., A review of the transmission of translational seat vibration to the head, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1998, 215(4), 863–882.
16.
WangW.RakhejaS. and BoileauP.É., Relationship between measured apparent mass and seat-to-head transmissibility responses of seated occupants exposed to vertical vibration, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2008, 314(3), 907–922.
17.
HolmlundP.LundströmR. and LindbergL., Mechanical impedance of the human body in vertical direction, Applied Ergonomics, 2000, 31(4), 415–422.
18.
MansfieldN.J., Impedance methods (apparent mass, driving point mechanical impedance and absorbed power) for assessment of the biomechanical response of the seated person to whole-body vibration, Industrial Health, 2005, 43(3), 378–389.
19.
MeuschJ.RahmatallaS., Whole-body vibration transmissibility in supine humans: Effects of board litter and neck collar, Applied Ergonomics, in press, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.09.007.
20.
MeuschJ., Supine human response and vibration-suppression during whole-body vibration, MS thesis, 2012, University of Iowa. http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/2945
GriffinM.J., Handbook of Human Vibration, Academic Press, London, UK, 1990.
23.
JalilAbdul N.A. and GriffinM.J., Fore-and-aft apparent mass of the back: Nonlinearity and variation with vertical location, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2008, 318(4), 1348–1363.
24.
MansfieldN.J. and GriffinM.J., Non-linearities in apparent mass and transmissibility during exposure to whole-body vertical vibration, Journal of Biomechanics, 2000, 33(8), 933–941.
25.
NawaysehN. and GriffinM.J., Power absorbed during whole-body vertical vibration: Effects of sitting posture, backrest, and footrest, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2010, 329(14), 2928–2938.
26.
DeShawJ. and RahmatallaS., Comprehensive measurement in whole-body vibration, Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 2012, 31(2), 63–74.
27.
NewlandD.E., An introduction to random vibrations and spectral analysis, Longman, New York, 1984.
28.
PaganoM. and GauvreauK., Principles of biostatistics, Duxbury Pacific Grove, California, 2000.
