In this paper, the performance characteristics of a photovoltaic (PV) module are modeled numerically and validated experimentally for the typical climatic conditions of Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. The electrical model is developed using EES software including all the important parameters like cell temperature, maximum power point current, maximum power point voltage, electrical power, and maximum power point efficiency. The model results were compared with the experimental values obtained by exposing the PV panel to the local environmental conditions of Dhahran. The variation of cell temperature, maximum power point current, voltage, maximum power and efficiency of PV module was recorded for a typical day and the effect of climatic conditions including solar irradiance, ambient temperature and wind speed was quantified. Finally, the modeled results were found to be in close agreement with the experimental values with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.98 and root mean square error of e = 5.2% for the overall efficiency and power output.
AadityaG.PillaiR.ManiM., 2013. An insight into real-time performance assessment of a building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) installation in Bangalore (India). Energy for Sustainable Development17(5), 431–437.
2.
AbdullahA.H.GhoneimA.A.Al-HasanA.Y., 2002. Assessment of grid-connected photovoltaic systems in the Kuwaiti climate. Renewable Energy26(2), 189–199.
3.
AdinoyiM.J.SaidS.A.M., 2013. Effect of dust accumulation on the power outputs of solar photovoltaic modules. Renewable Energy60, 633–636.
4.
AhmadG.E.HusseinH.M.S.El-GhetanyH.H., 2003. Theoretical analysis and experimental verification of PV modules. Renewable Energy28(8), 1159–1168.
5.
AlajlanS.A.SmiaiM.S., 1996. Performance and development of PV-plant for water pumping and desalination for remote area in Saudi Arabia. Renewable Energy8(1), 441–446.
6.
AlonsoM.C.GarciaBalenzateguiJ.L., 2004. Estimation of photovoltaic module yearly temperature and performance based on nominal operation cell temperature calculations. Renewable Energy29(12), 1997–2010.
7.
AlshakhsM., 2013. Challenges of solar PV in Saudi Arabia: Submitted as coursework for PH240, Stanford University, Fall 2013, assessed on 7 March 2014.
8.
BelgacemB.G., 2012. Performance of submersible PV water pumping systems in Tunisia. Energy for Sustainable Development16(4), 415–420.
9.
BranoV.L.OrioliA.CiullaG., 2012. On the experimental validation of an improved five-parameter model for silicon photovoltaic modules. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells105, 27–39.
10.
CarrA.J.PryorT.L., 2004. A comparison of the performance of different PV module types in temperate climates. Solar Energy76(1), 285–294.
11.
CharabiY.GastliA., 2013. Integration of temperature and dust effects in siting large PV power plant in hot arid area. Renewable Energy57, 635–644.
12.
De SotoW.KleinS.A.BeckmanW.A., 2006. Improvement and validation of a model for photovoltaic array performance. Solar Energy80(1), 78–88.
13.
DubeyS.TayA.A.O., 2013. Testing of two different types of photovoltaic–thermal (PVT) modules with heat flow pattern under tropical climatic conditions. Energy for Sustainable Development17(1), 1–12.
14.
DuffieJ.A.BeckmanW.A., 2006. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. 3rd Edition. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York, John Wiley and Sons, pp. 928.
15.
GxashekaA.R.Van DykE.E.MeyerE.L., 2005. Evaluation of performance parameters of PV modules deployed outdoors. Renewable Energy30(4), 611–620.
16.
JoshiA.S.TiwariA.TiwariG.N.DincerI.ReddyB.V., 2009. Performance evaluation of a hybrid photovoltaic thermal (PV/T) (glass-to-glass) system. International Journal Thermal Science48(1), 154–164.
17.
KingD.L.BoysonW.E.KratochvilJ.A., 2004. Photovoltaic array performance model, Sandia National Laboratories Report, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 and Livermore, California 94550, United States: SAND2004–3535.
18.
KumarK.A.SundareswaranK.VenkateswaranP.R., 2014. Performance study on a grid connected 20 kWp solar photovoltaic installation in an industry in Tiruchirappalli (India). Energy for Sustainable Development23, 294–304.
19.
KurnikJ.JankovecM.BreclK.TopicM., 2011. Outdoor testing of PV module temperature and performance under different mounting and operational conditions. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells95(1), 373–376.
20.
HornungT.SteinerM.NitzP., 2012. Estimation of the influence of Fresnel lens temperature on energy generation of a concentrator photovoltaic system. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells99, 333–338.
21.
KimJ.P.LimH.SongJ.H.ChangY.J.JeonC.H., 2011. Numerical analysis on the thermal characteristics of photovoltaic module with ambient temperature variation. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells95(1), 404–407.
22.
PadmavathiK.DanielS.A., 2013. Performance analysis of a 3 MWp grid connected solar photovoltaic power plant in India. Energy for Sustainable Development17(6), 615–625.
23.
RehmanS.El-GebeilyM., 2010. Variation of meteorological parameters over Saudi Arabia (1990–2006). World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development7(2), 191–216.
SkoplakiE.BoudouvisA.G.PalyvosJ.A., 2008. A simple correlation for the operating temperature of photovoltaic modules of arbitrary mounting. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells92(1), 1393–1402.
26.
TibaC.RicardoE. D. A., 2012. Siting PV plant focusing on the effect of local climate variables on electric energy production-Case study for Araripina and Recife. Renewable Energy48, 309–317.
27.
TrinurukP.SorapipatanaC.ChenvidhyaD., 2009. Estimating operating cell temperature of BIPV modules in Thailand. Renewable Energy34(11), 2515–2523.
28.
VillalvaM.G.GazoliJ.R.FilhoE.R., 2009. Comprehensive approach to modeling and simulation of photovoltaic arrays. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics24(5), 1198–1208.
