A laminar flamelet model prediction of a bluff body stabilized CH4/H2 flame is reported. The predicted results of temperature and major and minor species as well as NO are compared against the Raman/Rayleigh/LIF data available from the University of Sydney. The effect of differential diffusion is also studied. The calculation shows that temperature and concentration of major and minor species are better predicted by the unity Lewis number flamelet. It is also shown that the current steady state flamelet approach has difficulties in predicting experimental NO levels.
PetersN.Laminar flamelet model in non-premixed turbulent combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 1984, 10, 319–339.
2.
PetersN.Laminar flamelet concepts in turbulent combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst., 1986, 21, 1231–1250.
3.
BilgerR.W.Conditional moment closure for turbulent reacting flows. Physics Fluids A, 1993, 5(2), 436–444.
4.
BilgerR.W.Future progress in turbulent combustion research. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 2000, 26, 367–380.
5.
PopeS.B.PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 1985, 11, 119–192.
6.
PopeS.B.Computation of turbulent combustion: Progress and challenges. Proc. Combust. Inst., 1990, 23, 591–612.
7.
SandersJ.P.H.ChenJ.-Y.GökalpI.G.Flamelet based modeling of NO formation in turbulent hydrogen jet diffusion flames. Combust. Flame,, 1997, 111, 1–15.
8.
SchlatterM.FerreiraJ.C.FluryM.GassJ.Analysis of turbulence-chemistry interaction with respect to NO formation in turbulent, nonpremixed hydrogen-air flames. Proc. Combust. Inst.,, 1996, 26, 2215–2222.
9.
SandersJ.P.H.GökalpI.G.Flamelet based predictions and scaling laws of NO formation in turbulent hydrogen diffusion flames. In 18th International Symposium on Transport Phenomenon in Combustion, San Francisco, California, 1995, pp. 286–297.
10.
ChenJ.-Y.ChangW.C.Flamelet modelling of CO and NOx emission from a turbulent, methane hydrogen jet nonpremixed flame. Proc. Combust. Inst., 1996, 26, 2207–2214.
11.
VranosA.KnightB.A.ProsciaW.M.ChiappettaL.SmookeM.D.Nitric oxide formation and differential diffusion in a methane hydrogen diffusion flame. Proc. Combust. Inst., 1992, 24, 377–384.
12.
BarlowR.S.CarterC.D.Raman/Rayleigh/LIF measurements of nitric oxide formation in turbulent hydrogen jet flames. Combust. Flame, 1994, 97, 261–280.
13.
DallyB.B.MasriA.R.BarlowR.W.FiechtnerG.J.FletcherD.F.Measurements of NO in turbulent non-premixed flames stabilized on a bluff body. Proc. Combust. Inst., 1996, 26, 2191–2197.
14.
DallyB.B.MasriA.R.BarlowR.W.FiechtnerG.J.Instantaneous and mean compositional structure of bluff-body stabilized nonpremixed flames. Combust. Flame, 1998, 114, 119–148.
15.
MasriA.R.Database available from Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
16.
PetersN.Turbulent Combustion, 2000 (Cambridge University Press).
17.
PetersN.Flame calculations with reduced mechanisms-an outline. Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms for Applications in Combustion Systems (Eds PetersN.RoggB.), 1993, Ch. 1, pp. 3–14 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
18.
RoggB.RUN-1DL: The laminar flame and flamelet code, 1995.
19.
BilgerR.W.Structure of turbulent non-premixed flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 1988, 22, 475–488.
20.
TurnsS.R.Understanding NOx formation in nonpremixed flames: experiments and modelling. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 1995, 21, 361–385.
DupontV.PourkashanianM.RichardsonA.P.WilliamsA.The importance of prompt-NO formation and of NO reconversion in strained binary rich partially premixed flames. In 18th International Symposium on Transport Phenomenon in Combustion, San Fransisco, California, 1995, 263–274.
23.
MillerJ.A.BowmanC.T.Mechanism and modeling of nitrogen chemistry in combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 1989, 15, 287–338.
24.
WarnatzJ.MassU.DibbleR. W.Combustion: Physical and Chemical Fundamentals, Modelling and Simulation, Experiment, Pollutant Formation, 1996 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
25.
McGuirkJ.J.RodiW.The calculation of three-dimensional free jets. 1st Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows (Eds DurstF.), 1979, pp. 71–83.
26.
PopeS.B.An explanation of the turbulent round-jet/plane-jet anamoly. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 1978, 16, 279–281.
27.
DallyB.B.FletcherD.F.MasriA.R.Flow and mixing fields of turbulent bluff body jets and flames. Combust. Theory Model., 1998, 2, 193–219.
28.
HossainM.JonesJ.C.MalalasekeraW.Modelling of a bluff-body nonpremixed flame using a coupled radiation/flamelet combustion model. Flow Turbulence and Combust., 2001, 67, 217–234.
29.
Website of the International Workshop on Measurements and Computation of Turbulent Nonpremixed Flames.
