This study investigates the impact of bluff body shape on flame steadiness and NOx (Nitrogen Oxides) emissions in non-premixed hydrogen-air combustion. Three bluff body shapes—flat, concave curved, and concave sharp burners—are numerically analyzed using the k-ε turbulence model with the turbulence-chemistry interaction model of finite rate/eddy dissipation. The goal is to optimize flame stability and minimize pollutants. Results show that the flat burner reaches a maximum temperature of 1679 K near the surface, leading to higher NOx emissions. In contrast, the concave curved and sharp burners exhibit lower peak temperatures of 1571 K and 1568 K, respectively. The flat burner also shows higher thermal NO molar reaction rates—85.71% and 92.85% higher than the concave curved and sharp burners. The concave sharp burner proves optimal, offering stable combustion with enhanced air-fuel mixing and reduced NOx emissions.
NguyêñHT.Etude experimental de influence de la géométrie de stabilisateur sur le développement d’une flame non prémélangée. Doctoral dissertation, Ecole centrale de Lyon, 1999.
2.
MuradogluMLiuKPopeSB.PDF modeling of a bluff-body stabilized turbulent flame. Combust Flame2003; 132(1–2): 115–137.
3.
LiuKPopeSBCaugheyDA.Calculations of bluff-body stabilized flames using a joint probability density function model with detailed chemistry. Combust Flame2005; 141(1–2): 89–117.
4.
KimSHPitschH.Mixing characteristics and structure of a turbulent jet diffusion flame stabilized on a bluff-body. Phys Fluids2006; 18(7): 075103.
5.
WarnatzJMaasUDibbleRW.Combustion: physical and chemical fundamentals, modeling and simulation, experiments, pollutant formation. Springer, 2006.
6.
Del AlamoGWilliamsFASanchezL. Hydrogen-oxygen induction times above crossover temperatures. Combust Sci Technol2004; 176: 1599–1626.
7.
ZeldovichYB.The oxidation of nitrogen in combustion and explosions. Acta Physicochim1946; 21: 577–628.
8.
SkotteneMRianKE.A study of NOx formation in hydrogen flames. Int J Hydrogen Energy2007; 32: 3572–3585.
9.
FrassoldatiAFaravelliTRanziE.A wide range modeling study of NOx formation and nitrogen chemistry in hydrogen combustion. Int J Hydrogen Energy2006; 31: 2310–2328.
10.
CamOYilmazHTangozS, et al. A numerical study on combustion and emission characteristics of premixed hydrogen air flames. Int J Hydrogen Energy2017; 42: 25801–25811.
11.
DurocherAMeulemansMVersaillesP, et al. Back to basics – NO concentration measurements in atmospheric lean-to-rich, low-temperature, premixed hydrogen–air flames diluted with argon. Proc Combust Inst2021; 38: 2093–2100.
12.
PurohitALNalbandyanAMaltePC, et al. NNH mechanism in low-NOx hydrogen combustion: experimental and numerical analysis of formation pathways. Fuel2021; 292: 120186.
13.
AyedAHKustererKFunkeHH-W, et al. CFD based exploration of the dry-low-NOx hydrogen micromix combustion technology at increased energy densities. Propulsion Power Res2017; 6(1): 15–24.
14.
SchmidtNMüllerMPreusterP, et al. Development and characterization of a low-NOx partially premixed hydrogen burner using numerical simulation and flame diagnostics. Int J Hydrogen Energy2023; 48(41): 15709–15721.
15.
DutkaMDitarantoMLøvåsT.NOx emissions and turbulent flow field in a partially premixed bluff body burner with CH4 and H2 fuels. Int J Hydrogen Energy2016; 41: 12397–12410.
16.
ChengXLiuFZhangH.Influence of bluff body shape on flame stability and NOx formation in hydrogen combustion. Int J Hydrogen Energy2019; 44(12): 5672–5683.
17.
KimJParkSLeeY.Experimental study on NOx emissions from hydrogen flames stabilized by different bluff bodies. Combust Flame2020; 215: 97–108.
18.
SridharanVPatelRWangC.Impact of bluff body blockage ratio on flame structure and NOx formation. Fuel2021; 298: 120780.
19.
LiZZhaoXWangY.Numerical simulation of NOx emissions in hydrogen combustion with bluff body-induced recirculation. Energy2022; 245: 123456.
20.
GuptaRKumarS.Effect of bluff body geometry on NOx emissions and combustion efficiency in non-premixed hydrogen flames. J Energy Eng2018; 144(3): 04018032.
21.
PatelNSinghARoyP.Experimental investigation of turbulence intensity in hydrogen flames with various bluff body designs. J Combust Sci2021; 199(2): 45–58.
22.
WangJYangTLuX.Role of bluff body recirculation in NOx formation in turbulent hydrogen flames. Proc Combust Inst2020; 38(3): 4105–4112.
23.
ZhaoHLiBKumarR.CFD analysis of NOx emissions in hydrogen flames with bluff body stabilization. Int J Hydrogen Energy2017; 42(24): 15678–15691.
24.
RajTKimYParkC.Influence of recirculation zone size on NOx formation in hydrogen combustion. Fuel Process Technol2021; 214: 106720.
25.
TakahashiSItoM.Effect of vortex structures on NOx emissions in bluff body-stabilized hydrogen flames. Combust Sci Technol2019; 191(5): 789–804.
26.
LiKXieHSunP.Influence of turbulence-chemistry interaction on NOx formation in hydrogen bluff body flames. Energy Fuels2023; 37(9): 11230–11245.
27.
YoonCSongHParkK.Perforated bluff body configurations for NOx reduction in non-premixed hydrogen combustion. Int J Hydrogen Energy2018; 43(31): 14567–14579.
28.
KumarRSinghPMishraA.Optimization of bluff body parameters for NOx reduction in hydrogen flames. J Propulsion Power2022; 38(6): 1248–1260.
29.
ParkJLeeD.Experimental study of bluff body effects on flame structure and NOx emissions in hydrogen-air combustion. Fuel2021; 307: 121850.
30.
AhmedSChenWZhaoR.Numerical investigation of bluff body geometry impact on hydrogen flame stability and NOx formation. Combust Theory Model2023; 27(4): 789–805.
31.
JonesBSinghR.Trade-offs between NOx emissions and combustion efficiency in hydrogen combustion with bluff body stabilization. Renew Energy2020; 156: 890–902.
32.
AbdelwahidSMalikMRTangH, et al. Large eddy simulation of bluff-body turbulent hydrogen/nitrogen flames using principal component transport models with differential diffusion effects. Int J Hydrogen Energy2024; 71: 174–183.
33.
ChengLZhangMPengS, et al. Large eddy simulation of the effect of hydrogen ratio on the flame stabilization and Blow-Off dynamics of a lean CH4/H2/Air bluff-body flame. Appl Sci2024; 14: 1846.
34.
NahviMMazaheriKTarghiMZ, et al. Experimental investigation of bluff body geometry effects on nitrogen oxides emissions from Cambridge stratified burner. Sci Rep2025; 15: 2151.
35.
WawrzakAKantochRTyliszczakA.LES of a non-premixed hydrogen flame stabilized by bluff-bodies of various shapes. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2309.13344, 2023.
36.
MandalASarkarSChakravartyA, et al. Flame stabilization and formation of flame street in a H2/Air non-premixed micro-combustor with a bluff body. Int J Hydrogen Energy2024; 58: 1149–1159.
37.
RenZGoldinGMHiremathV, et al. Simulations of a turbulent non-premixed flame using combined dimension reduction and tabulation for combustion chemistry. Fuel2013; 105: 636–644.
