The objective of the current work is to assess the performance of different combustion models in predicting turbulent non-premixed combustion in conjunction with the k-∊ turbulence model. The laminar flamelet, equilibrium chemistry, constrained equilibrium chemistry, and flame sheet models are applied to simulate combustion in a CH4/H2 bluff-body flame experimentally studied by the University of Sydney. The computational results are compared to experimental values of mixture fraction, temperature, and constituent mass fractions. The comparison shows that the laminar flamelet model performs better than other combustion models and mimics most of the significant features of the bluff-body flame.
JonesW. P.WhitelawJ. H.Calculations method for reacting turbulent flows: A review. Combust. Flame, 1982, 48, 1–26.
2.
MagnussenB. F.HjertagerB. H.On modelling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst., 1976, 18, 719–729.
3.
VisserB. M.SmartJ. P.Van de KampW. L.WeberR.Measurements and predictions of quarl zone properties of swirling pulverised coal flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 1990, 23, 949–955.
4.
IslamA. K. M. S.HossainM.Prediction of local species concentration in an axisymmetric furnace. J. Energy Heat Mass Transf., 1996, 18, 141–146.
5.
PetersN.Laminar flamelet models in nonpremixed turbulent combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 1984, 10, 319–339.
6.
PetersN.Laminar flamelet concepts in turbulent combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst., 1986, 21, 1231–1250.
7.
BilgerR. W.Conditional moment closure for turbulent reacting flows. Phys. Fluids A, 1993, 5(2), 436–444.
8.
PopeS. B.PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 1985, 11, 119–192.
9.
PopeS. B.Computations of turbulent combustion: Progress and challenges. Proc. Combust. Inst., 1990, 23, 591–612.
10.
KimS. H.HuhK. Y.Use of the conditional moment closure model to predict NO formation in a turbulent CH4/H2 flame over a bluff-body. Combust. Flame, 2002, 130, 94–111.
11.
MasriA. R.Computation of bluff-body stabilized jets and flames. In Proceedings of 5th International Workshop on Measurements and Computation of Turbulent Nonpremixed Flames, Delft, The Netherlands, section 3, 2000, available from http://www.ca.sandia.gov/TNF.
12.
DallyB. B.MasriA. R.BarlowR. S.FiechtnerG. J.Instantaneous and mean compositional structure of bluff-body stabilised nonpremixed flames. Combust. Flame, 1998, 114, 119–148.
13.
MasriA. R.Data-base available from the Department of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, The University of Sydney, Australia available from http://www.aeromech.usyd.edu.au/thermofluids.
14.
DallyB. B.FletcherD. F.MasriA. R.Flow and mixing fields of turbulent bluff-body jets and flames. Combust. Theory Model, 1998, 2, 193–219.
15.
MerciB.DickE.VierendeelsJ.RoekaertsD.PeetersT. W. J.Application of a new cubic turbulence model to piloted and bluff-body diffusion flames. Combust. Flame, 2001, 126, 1533–1556.
16.
LiG.NaudB.RoekaertsD.Numerical investigation of a bluff-body stabilised nonpremixed flame with differential Reynolds-stress models. Flow Turbul. Combust., 2003, 70, 211–240.
17.
YanJ.ThieleF.BuffatM.A turbulence model sensitivity study for CH4/H2 bluff-body stabilized flames. Flow Turbul. Combust., 2004, 73, 1–24.
18.
HossainM.MalalasekeraW.Numerical study of bluff-body flame structures using laminar flamelet model. Proc. IMechE Part A: J. Power and Energy, 2005, 219, 361–370.
19.
HossainM.MalalasekeraW.Modelling of a bluff body stabilised CH4/H2 flames based on a laminar flamelet model with emphasis on NO prediction. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs Part A: J. Power and Energy, 2003, 217, 201–210.
20.
HossainM.JonesJ. C.MalalasekeraW.Modelling of a bluff-body nonpremixed flame using a coupled radiation/flamelet combustion model. Flow Turbul. Combust., 2001, 67, 217–234.
21.
MuradogluM.LiuK.PopeS. B.PDF modelling of a bluff-body stabilized turbulent flame. Combust. Flame, 2003, 132, 115–117.
22.
LiuK.PopeS. B.CaugheyD. A.Calculations of bluff-body stabilised flames using a joint probability density function model with detailed chemistry. Combust Flame, 2005, 141, 89–117.
23.
WarnatzJ.MassU.DibbleR. W.Combustion: physical and chemical fundamentals, modelling and simulation, experiments, pollutant formation, 1996 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
24.
RoggB.RUN-1DL: the laminar flame and flamelet code, user's manual, 1995.
25.
BilgerR. W.Structure of turbulent nonpremixed flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 1988, 22, 475–488.
26.
PetersN.Flame calculations with reduced mechanisms-an outline. In Reduced kinetic mechanisms for applications in combustion systems (Eds N. Peters and B. Rogg), 1993, chapter 1, pp. 3–14 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
27.
BarlowR. S.DibbleR. W.LuchtR. P.ChenJ.-Y.Effect of Damkohler number on superequilibrium OH concentration in turbulent nonpremixed jet flames. Combust. Flame, 1990, 82, 235–251.
28.
DrakeM. C.BlintR. J.Structure of laminar opposed flow diffusion flames with CO/H2/N2 fuel. Combust. Sci. Technol., 1988, 61, 187–224.
