The aim of this article is to give readers a general overview of the concepts involved in the latest generation of implantable hearing aids. A section on ear biomechanics has also been included to familiarize readers with the basic concepts involved. These devices have been developed over the last 20 years, driven by problems with conventional hearing aids and by advances in the understanding of middle-ear mechanics. The use of technology borrowed from cochlear implants has enabled the first generation of fully implantable aids to be trialled. The author examines the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of implantable hearing aids over conventional aids and then reviews the technology and clinical results of a range of devices that have been trialled.
van StaadenM. J.RieserM.OttS. R.PabstM. A.RomerH.Serial hearing organs in the atympanate grasshopper Bullacris membracioides (Orthoptera, Pneumoridae). J. Comparative Neurology, 2003, 465(4), 579–592.
2.
MillsR.ZhangJ.Applied comparative physiology of the avian middle ear: The effect of static pressure changes in columellar ears. J. Laryngology Otology, 2006, 120(12), 1005–1007.
3.
KerrA. G. (Ed.) Scott Brown's otolaryngology, 6th edn, 1996 (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford).
4.
DysonM. L.KlumpG. M.GaugerB.Absolute hearing thresholds and critical masking ratios in the European barn owl: A comparison with other owls. J. Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology, 1998, 182(5), 695–702.
5.
YostW. A.Fundamentals of hearing: An introduction, 5th edition, 2006 (Elsevier, Oxford).
WahlbergM.The acoustic behaviour of diving sperm whales observed with a hydrophone array. J. Expl Mar. Biology Ecology, 2002, 281(1–2), 53–62.
8.
VermeijG.Historical contingency and the purported uniqueness of evolutionary innovations. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. USA, 2006, 103(6), 1804–1809.
9.
NummelaS.Scaling of the mammalian middle ear. Hearing Res., 1995, 85(1–2), 18–30.
10.
CrockerM. J. (Ed.) Handbook of acoustics, 1998 (John Wiley, New York).
11.
HeffnerH. E.HeffnerR. S.Auditory perception. In Farm animals and the environment (Eds PhillipsC.PigginsD.), 1992, pp. 159–184 (C.A.B. International, Wallingford, Oxfordshire).
12.
DuncanC. O.Ho-AsjoeM.HittingerR.NishikawaH.WaterhouseN.CoghlanB.JonesB.Demographics and macroeconomic effects in aesthetic surgery in the UK. Br. J. Plastic Surg., 2004, 57(6), 561–566.
13.
DoolingR. J.LohrB.DentM. L.Hearing in birds and reptiles. In Comparative hearing: Birds and reptiles (Eds DoolingR. J.FayR. R.PopperA. H.), 2000, pp. 308–359 (Springer-Verlag, New York).
HuttenbrinkK. B.Middle ear mechanics and their interface with respect to implantable electronic otologic devices. Otolaryngologic Clinics N Am., 2001, 34(2), 315–335.
16.
NobiliR.MammanoF.AshmoreJ.How well do we understand the cochlea? Trends Neurosci., 1998, 21(4), 159–67.
17.
ManoussakiD.DimitriadisE. K.ChadwickR. S.Cochlea's graded curvature effect on low frequency waves. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2006, 96(8), 88–701.
18.
RickardsL.FoxK.RobertsC.FletcherL.GoddardE.Living in Britain general household survey2002, 2004 (HMSO, London).
19.
Maki-TorkkoE. M.SorriM. J.LaukliE.Objective assessment of hearing aid use. Scand. Audiology, 2001, 30, 81–82.
20.
BroschS.MichelsL.MauzP. S.de MaddalenaH.LowenheimH.Factors influencing rehabilitation after sensorineural hearing loss with hearing aids. HNO, 2005, 53(2), 142–147.
21.
KochkinS.MarkeTrak III: Why 20 million in US don't use hearing aids for their hearing loss. Hearing J., 1993, 46(1), 20–27.
22.
ShusinaN. A.RafaelyB.Unbiased adaptive feedback cancellation in hearing aids by closed-loop identification. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Language Processing, 2006, 14(2), 658–665.
23.
TognolaG.ParazziniM.SveltoC.RavazzaniP.GrandoriF.Three-dimensional laser scanning and reconstruction of ear canal impressions for optimal design of hearing aid shells. Proc. SPIE, 2003, 5009, 19–26.
24.
KimH. H.BarrsD. M.Hearing aids: A review of what's new. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg., 2006, 134, 1043–1050.
25.
KukF.Maximum useable insertion gain with various earmould configurations. J. Amer. Acad. Audiology, 1994, 5, 44–51.
26.
KukF.LudvigsenC.KaulbergT.Understanding feedback and digital feedback cancellation strategies. Hearing Rev., 2002, 9, 36–41.
27.
LupsakkoT. A.KautiainenH. J.SulkavaR.The non-use of hearing aids in people aged 75 years and over in the city of Kuopio in Finland. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2005, 262(3), 165–169.
28.
PalmerC.OrtmannA.Hearing loss and hearing aids. Neurologic Clinics, 2005, 23, 901–918.
YoshizawaM.KomiyaY.MoriyaT.Transducer vibration method for interference-based reflection-type in vivo measurement for acoustic impedance of bone. Jap. J. Appl. Physics Part 1: Regular Papers Brief Commun. Rev. Papers, 2006, 45(5B), 4703–4705.
35.
KieferJ.ArnoldW.StaudenmaierR.Round window stimulation with an implantable hearing aid (Soundbridge (R)) combined with autogenous reconstruction of the auricle - a new approach. ORL J. Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Related Specialities, 2006, 68(6), 378–385.
36.
WinterM.WeberB.LenarzT.The use of reverse transfer funtion (RTF) in the fitting of implantable hearing devices. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Electronic implants in otology and conventional hearing aids, 2003, pp. 59–62 (Cochlear Implant International, Toulouse).
37.
WullsteinH.Theory and practice of tympano-plasty. Laryngoscope, 1956, 66, 1076–1093.
38.
DjournoA.EyriesC.Prothese auditive par excitation electrique a distance du nerf sensorial al'aide d'un bobinage inclus a demeure. Presse Med., 1957, 35, 14–17.
39.
SheaJ. J.Tympanoplasty in chronic right otitis media: A case report. Memphis Medicine, 1958, 33, 271–275.
40.
BallG. R.Implantable magnetic hearing aid transducer. US Pat. 5456654, 1 July 1993.
SnikA.CremersC.Audiometric evaluation of an attempt to optimize the fixation of the transducer of a middle-ear implant to the ossicular chain with bone cement. Clin. Otolaryngology, 2004, 29(1), 5–9.
43.
GanR. Z.DyerR. K.WoodM. W.DormerK. J.Mass loading on the ossicles and middle ear function. Ann. Otology Rhinology Laryngology, 2001, 110(5), 478–485.
44.
NeedhamA. J.JiangD.BibasA.JeronimidisG.O'ConnorA. F.The effects of mass loading the ossicles with a floating mass transducer on middle ear transfer function. Otology Neurotology, 2005, 26(2), 218–224.
45.
TodtI.SeidlR. O.GrossM.ErnstA.Comparison of different vibrant Soundbridge audioprocessors with conventional hearing aids. Otology Neurotology, 2002, 23(5), 669–673.
46.
TodtI.SeidlR. O.ErnstA.Hearing benefit of patients after vibrant soundbridge implantation. ORL J. Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Related Specialities, 2005, 67(4), 203–206.
47.
BabighianG.MazzoliM.Implantable middle ear devices: Our experience. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Electronic Implants in Otology and Conventional Hearing Aids, 2003, pp. 65–69 (Cochlear Implant International, Toulouse).
48.
SterkersO.BoucarraD.LabassiS.BebearJ. P.DubreuilC.FrachetB.FraysseB.LavieilleJ.-P.MagnanJ.MartinC.TruyE.UzielA.VaneeclooF. M.A middle ear implant, the Symphonix Vibrant Soundbridge: Retrospective study of the first 125 patients implanted in France. Otology Neurotology, 2003, 24(3), 427–436.
49.
SchmuzigerN.SchimmannF.WengenD.PatschekeJ.ProbstR.Long-term assessment after implantation of the Vibrant Sound-bridge device. Otology Neurotology, 2006, 27(2), 183–188.
50.
DietzT. G.BallG. R.KatzB. H.Partially implantable vibrating ossicular prosthesis in Proceedings of the1997International Conference on Solid-state sensors and actuators (TRANSDUCERS 97), Chicago, Illinois, USA. 1997, pp. 433–436 (IEEE, New York).
51.
TodtI.SeidlR. O.MutzeT.ErnstA.MRI scanning and incus fixation in Vibrant Soundbridge implantation. Otology Neurotology, 2004, 25(6), 969–972.
52.
JorgeJ. R.PfisterM.ZennerH. P.ZalamanI. M.MaassenM. M.In vitro model for intraoperative adjustments in an implantable hearing aid (MET). Laryngoscope, 2006, 116(3), 473–481.
HoughJ. V. D.MatthewsP.WoodM. W.DyerR. K.Middle ear electromagnetic semi-implantable hearing device - results of the phase II SOUNDTEC Direct System clinical trial. Otology Neurotology, 2002, 23(6), 895–903.
55.
SilversteinH.AtkinsJ.ThompsonJ. H.GilmanN.Experience with the SOUNDTEC implantable hearing aid. Otology Neurotology, 2005, 26(2), 211–217.
56.
DyerR. K.DormerK. J.HoughJ. V. D.NakmaliU.WickershamR.Biomechanical influences of magnetic resonance imaging on the SOUNDTEC Direct System implant. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg., 2002, 127(6), 520–530.
57.
DyerR. K.NakmaliD.DormerK. J.Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System. Laryngoscope, 2006, 116(8), 1321–1333.
58.
MatthewsP.The SOUNDTEC Direct System. Trends Amplification, 2002, 6(2), 61–65.
59.
ManigliaA. J.KoW. H.GarverickS. L.AbbassH.KaneM.RosenbaumM.MurrayG.Semi-implantable middle ear electromagnetic hearing device for sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Nose Throat J., 1997, 76(5), 333–341.
60.
ManigliaA. J.NakabayashiN.PaparellaM. M.WerningJ. W.A new adhesive bonding material for the cementation of implantable devices in otologic surgery. Am. J. Otology, 1997, 18(3), 322–327.
61.
SpindelJ. H.LambertP. R.RuthR. A.The round window electromagnetic implantable hearing aid approach. Otolaryngologic Clinics N. Am., 1995, 28(1), 189–205.
62.
ZennerH. P.LimbergerA.BaumannJ. W.ReischlG.ZalamanI. M.MauzP. S.SweetowR. W.PlinkertP. K.ZimmermannR.BaumannI.De MaddalenaH.LeysietfferH.MaassenM. M.Phase III results with a totally implantable piezoelectric middle ear implant: Speech audiometry, spatial hearing and psychosocial adjustment. Acta Oto-Laryngolica, 2004, 124(2), 155–164.
63.
ZennerH. P.Personal conversation regarding the current status of TICA, 2006.
64.
YanagiharaN.SatoH.HinohiraY.GyoK.HoriK.Long-term results using a piezoelectric semi-implantable middle ear hearing device - The Rion Device E-type. Otolaryngologic Clinics N. Am., 2001, 34(2), 389–400.
DormerK.SeeneyC.LewellingK.LianG. D.GibsonD.JohnsonM.Epithelial internalization of superparamagnetic nanoparticles and response to external magnetic field. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(14), 2061–2072.
69.
SichelJ. Y.FreemanS.FleishmanZ.EliasharR.SohmerH.New approach for implantable hearing aids: A feasibility study. Ann. Otology Rhinology Laryngology, 2004, 113(11), 936–940.
70.
MillsR. P.WangZ. G.AbelE. W.EngC.In vitro study of a multi-layer piezoelectric crystal attic hearing implant. J. Laryngology Otology, 2001, 115(5), 359–362.
71.
WangZ. G.AbelE. W.MillsR. P.LiuY.Assessment of multi-layer piezoelectric actuator technology for middle-ear implants. Mechatronics, 2002, 12(1), 3–17.
72.
PerkinsR.Earlens tympanic contact transducer: A new method of sound transduction to the human ear. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg., 1996, 114(6), 720–728.
