Chronic otitis media enables the appearance of a benign middle ear tumor, known as a cholesteatoma, that may compromise hearing. To evaluate the influence of a cholesteatoma growth on the hearing function, a computational middle ear model based on the finite element method was used and three different size of cholesteatoma were modeled. The cholesteatoma solidification and the consequent degradation of the ossicles were also simulated as two condition that commonly occurs during cholesteatoma evolution. A sound pressure level of 80 dB SPL was applied in the tympanic membrane and a steady state analysis was performed for frequencies from 100 Hz to 10 kHz. The displacements of both the tympanic membrane and the stapes footplate were measured. The results were compared with a healthy case and it was shown that the cholesteatoma development leads to a decrease in the umbo and stapes displacements. The ossicles degradation simulation showed the higher difference comparing with the cholesteatoma in an initial stage, with lower displacements in the stapes footplate mainly for high frequencies. The observed displacement differences are directly connected to hearing loss, being possible to conclude that cholesteatoma evolution in the middle ear will lead to hearing problems, mainly in an advanced stage.
ZahnertT. Differenzialdiagnose der schwerhörigkeit. Dtsch Arztebl2011; 108(25): 433–444.
2.
MorrisPSLeachAJ. Acute and chronic otitis media. Pediatr Clin North Am2009; 56(6): 1383–1399.
3.
World Health Organization. Chronic suppurative otitis media: burden of illness and management options. Geneva: WHO, 2004.
4.
World Health Organization. Global costs of unaddressed hearing loss and cost-effectiveness of interventions a WHO report, 2017. Geneva: WHO, 2017.
5.
IkedaMNakazatoHOnodaK, et al. Facial nerve paralysis caused by middle ear cholesteatoma and effects of surgical intervention. Acta Otolaryngol2006; 126(1): 95–100.
6.
KennedyKLSinghAK. Middle ear cholesteatoma. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing, 2020.
7.
LipsLMJNelemansPJTheunissenFMD, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 1.5 T versus 3 T non-echo-planar diffusion – weighted imaging in the detection of residual or recurrent cholesteatoma in the middle ear and mastoid. J Neuroradiol2020; 47(6): 433–440.
8.
ChangPKimS. Cholesteatoma – diagnosing the unsafe ear. Aust Fam Physician2008; 37(8): 631–638.
9.
MankowskiNLRaggioBS. Otoscope exam. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing, 2020.
10.
KhdimMDouimiLChoukryK, et al. Hearing loss in cholesteatoma. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2020; 3(8): 1115.
WangHNorthropCBurgessB, et al. Three-dimensional virtual model of the human temporal bone. Otol Neurotol2006; 27(4): 452–457.
13.
GanRZSunQFengB, et al. Acoustic-structural coupled finite element analysis for sound transmission in human ear – pressure distributions. Med Eng Phys2006; 28(5): 395–404.
14.
GanRZReevesBPWangX. Modeling of sound transmission from ear canal to cochlea. Ann Biomed Eng2007; 35(12): 2180–2195.
15.
PuriaS. Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am2003; 113(5): 2773–2789.
16.
O’Connor16CaiHPuriaS. The effects of varying tympanic-membrane material properties on human middle-ear sound transmission in a three-dimensional finite-element model. J Acoust Soc Am2017; 142(5): 2836–2853.
17.
GentilFParenteMMartinsP, et al. Effects of the fibers distribution in the human eardrum: a biomechanical study. J Biomech2016; 49(9): 1518–1523.
18.
BerdichKGentilFParenteM, et al. Finite element analysis of the transfer of sound in the myringosclerotic ear. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin2016; 19(3): 248–256.
19.
LiuHZhangHYangJ, et al. Influence of ossicular chain malformation on the performance of round-window stimulation: a finite element approach. Proc Inst Mech Eng H2019; 233(5): 584–594.
20.
AreiasBSantosCNatal JorgeRM, et al. Finite element modelling of sound transmission from outer to inner ear. Proc Inst Mech Eng H2016; 230(11): 999–1007.
21.
SørensenMSDobrzenieckiABLarsenP, et al. The visible ear: a digital image library of the temporal bone. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec2002; 64(6): 378–381.
SunQGanRZChangKH, et al. Computer-integrated finite element modeling of human middle ear. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2002; 1(2): 109–122.
24.
De GreefDPiresFDirckxJJJ. Effects of model definitions and parameter values in finite element modeling of human middle ear mechanics. Hear Res2017; 344: 195–206.
25.
MuyshondtPGGDirckxJJJ. Structural stiffening in the human middle ear due to static pressure: finite-element analysis of combined static and dynamic middle-ear behavior. Hear Res2021; 400: 108116.
26.
André Faria AreiasB. Simulação Biomecânica Do Ouvido Humano, Incluindo Patologias Do Ouvido Médio. Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, Portugal. 2014.
27.
HolmKB. The chorda tympani nerve: role in taste impairment in middle ear disease and after ear surgery. Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala University, Sweden. 2017.
28.
GoyalASinghPPDashG. Chorda tympani in chronic inflammatory middle ear disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2009; 140(5): 682–686.
29.
TillemanTRTillemanMMNeumannMHA. The elastic properties of cancerous skin: Poisson’s ratio and Young’s modulus. Isr Med Assoc J2004; 6(12): 753–755.
30.
ZhangXGanRZ. Finite element modeling of energy absorbance in normal and disordered human ears. Hear Res2013; 301: 146–155.
31.
DuboeufFBurt-PichatBFarlayD, et al. Bone quality and biomechanical function: a lesson from human ossicles. Bone2015; 73: 105–110.
32.
NishiharaSGoodeRL. Measurement of tympanic membrane vibration in 99 human ears. In: HüttenbrinkK-B (ed.) Middle ear mechanics in research and otosurgery. Dresden, Germany: Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Dresden University of Technology, 1997, pp.91–93.
33.
HuberABallGAsaiM, et al. The vibration pattern of the tympanic membrane after placement of a total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP). Dresden, Germany: Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Dresden University of Technology, 1997.
34.
JiangXPLiCHDingH, et al. Influence of different materials for artificial auditory ossicle on the dynamic characteristics of human ear and research on hearing recovery. J Vibroengineering2017; 19(4): 2995–3007.
35.
LeeCFChenPRLeeWJ, et al. Computer aided three-dimensional reconstruction and modeling of middle ear biomechanics by high-resolution computed tomography and finite element analysis. Biomed Eng Appl Basis Commun2006; 18(5): 214–221.
36.
GentilFGarbeCParenteM, et al. The biomechanical effects of stapes replacement by prostheses on the tympano-ossicular chain. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng2014; 30(12): 1409–1420.
37.
GanRZWoodMWDormerKJ. Human middle ear transfer function measured by double laser interferometry system. Otol Neurotol2004; 25(4): 423–435.
38.
VossSERosowskiJJMerchantSN, et al. Acoustic responses of the human middle ear. Hear Res2000; 150(1–2): 43–69.
39.
KringlebotnM. Network model for the human middle ear. Scand Audiol2009; 17(2): 75–85.
40.
ASTM International. Standard specification and test methods for metallic bone staples. ASTM F564-17, 2017. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, https://www.astm.org/Standards/F564.htm (accessed 21 May, 2021).
41.
HommaKDuYShimizuY, et al. Ossicular resonance modes of the human middle ear for bone and air conduction. J Acoust Soc Am2009; 125(2): 968–979.
42.
GerigRIhrleSRöösliC, et al. Contribution of the incudo-malleolar joint to middle-ear sound transmission. Hear Res2015; 327: 218–226.
43.
OlsenJMRibeiro FdeAYasuiMM, et al. Hearing loss assessment in primary and secondary acquired cholesteatoma. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol2015; 81(6): 653–657.
