North American railroads are experiencing an increased number of axle failures. The greatest increase has been observed in unit train coal wagons that are operated with 32400 kg axle loads. This level of loading has recently been permitted in service and represents a 10 per cent increase in the formerly permitted level. Failure statistics and the resulting increase in stress are discussed and several solutions are presented.
Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices, Section G, Part I, 1990, pp. 65–88 (Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC).
2.
HorgerO.Wheel, axle, and rail stress problems related to higher capacity cars—axle problems In Anthology of Rail Vehicle Dynamics, Vol. 3, Axles, Wheels, and Rail-Wheel Interaction, 1973, pp. 49–58 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York).
3.
ByrneR. Railroad axle design factors. ASME paper 67-RR-3, 23 January 1967.
4.
Axles with improved fatigue strength. Railroad Facts Technical Report 3, United States Steel, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1969.
5.
DedmonS.PilchJ.LonsdaleC.A comparison of railroad axle stress results using different design sizes, loading criteria, and analysis methods. In Proceedings of the 2001 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress, 2001, Vol. 3, paper RTD 25721 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York).
6.
Rolling stock, bogies—running gear, axle design calculation method, UIC 515–3, 1994 (Union International des Chemins de Fer, Paris).
7.
Railway applications—wheelsets and bogies, non-powered axles—method of design. CEN prEN 13103, Final Draft, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, January 1999.
8.
Design guide for the calculation of stresses in non-driving axles, BASS 504, British Railways Board, August 1985.
9.
ASTM Standard A 730–93 Standard Specification for Forgings, Carbon and Alloy Steel, for Railway Use, 1993 (American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshocken, Pennsylvania).
