This article investigates the performance benefits of building suspension systems that employ a newly developed mechanical element called an inerter. The inerter was proposed as a genuine two-terminal mechanical device to substitute for the mass element, which allows mechanical and electrical networks to become truly analogous. This study applied inerters to building suspension control. First, a one-degree-of-freedom (DOF) building model was examined in order to show the significant performance improvement by inerters, especially with a multi-layer design. Second, the discussion was extended to a two-DOF building model. Finally, a ball-screw inerter was constructed for testing. From the results, the inerters were deemed effective in reducing building vibrations.
PazM., Structural dynamics: Theory and computation (New York: Chapman & Hall1997).
2.
NaeimF., The seismic design handbook (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold1989).
3.
AlderA. J.FullerK. N. G., ‘Elastonmeric isolation mounts for buildings and structures: From design to installation’Proc. Inst. Acoust.213 (1999): 17–25.
4.
WallerR. A., Building on springs (Oxford: Pergamon Press1969).
5.
KellyJ. M., ‘A seismic base isolation: Review and bibliography’Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.53 (1986): 202–216.
6.
CloughR. W.PenzienJ., Dynamics of structures (New York: McGraw-Hill1993).
7.
BalendraT.KohC. G.HoY. C. T., ‘Dynamic response of buildings due to trains in underground tunnels’Earthq. Engng Struct. Dyn.203 (1991): 275–291.
8.
Thornely-TaylorR. M., ‘Vibration propagation from a train tunnel: Measurements to validate a numerical model’Acoust. Bull.256 (2000):.
9.
TalbotJ. P.HuntH. E. M., ‘The effect of side-restraint bearings on the performance of base-isolated buildings’Proc. IMechE, Part C: J. Mechanical Engineering Science217C8 (2003): 849–860 DOI: 10.1243/095440603322310404.
PapageorgiouC.SmithM. C., ‘Positive real synthesis using matrix inequalities for mechanical networks: Application to vehicle suspension’IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.133 (2006): 423–435.
13.
EvangelouS.LimebeerD. J. N.SharpR. S.SmithM. C., ‘Steering compensation for high-performance motorcycles’ In Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and control, 2004, pp. 749–754.
14.
WangF. C.LiaoM. K.LiaoB. H.SuW. J.ChanH. A., ‘The performance improvements of train suspension systems with mechanical networks employing inerters’Veh. Syst. Dyn.477 (2009): 805–830.
15.
WangF. C.LiaoM. K., ‘The lateral stability of train suspension systems employing inerters’Veh. Syst. Dyn. (2009): In press. DOI: 10.1080/00423110902993654.
16.
SharifA. K., Dynamic performance investigation of base-isolated structures (1999) PhD Dissertation.
17.
DoyleJ. C.FrancisB. A.TannenbaumA. R., Feedback control theory (New York: Maxwell Macmillan International1992).
TalbotJ. P.HuntH. E. M., ‘A generic model for evaluating the performance of base-isolated buildings’J. Low Freq. Noise Vibr. Active Control223 (2003): 149–160.
20.
PapageorgiouC.SmithM. C., ‘Laboratory experimental testing of inerters’ In Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and control and 2005 European Control Conference 2005, pp. 3351–3356.
21.
WangF. C.SuW. J., ‘The impact of inerter nonlinearities on vehicle suspension control’Veh. Syst. Dyn.467 (2008): 575–595.
22.
LjungL., System identification, theory for the user (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall1999).
23.
HensonP.CharlesJ. G., ‘The IMAX Cinema, Waterloo, London – an acoustic challenge’Proc. Inst. Acoust.216 (1999): 171–178.
