The objective of this work is to study, in a first part, the impact of mesh adaptation on computational estimates of lift and drag coefficients. The convergence of these quantities with successive adaptation is demonstrated by comparing with experimental results. As a second part, optimization of relevant adaptation parameters to accelerate the convergence is investigated. A combination of adaptation variables is proposed to better capture some physical features that are poorly represented when a single variable is used. On the other hand, a new error metric is derived from both Hessian and gradient that are used separately in the framework of mesh adaptation in general. The impact of the proposed improvements is demonstrated through test cases.
AinsworthM.OdenJ. T., A posteriori error estimation in finite element analysisComput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng.142 (1997): 1.
2.
BabucskaI.MillerA., The post-processing approach in the finite element method — part 1: Calculation of displacements, stresses and other higher order derivatives of the displacementsInt. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.20 (1984): 1085.
3.
BakerT. J., Mesh adaptation strategies for problems in fluid dynamicsFinite Elem. Anal. Des.25 (1997): 243.
4.
BakerT. J., Mesh adaptation strategies for problems in fluid dynamicsFinite Elem. Anal. Des.25 (1997): 243.
5.
BeckerR.RannacherR., Weighted a posteriori error control in finite element methods (1998) World Scientific, Singapore.
6.
CaretteJ. C., Adaptive unstructured mesh algorithms and SUPG finite element method for compressible high Reynolds number flows (1997): PhD Thesis, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Belgium.
7.
HabashiW. G.FortinM.YahiaD. A. A.BoivinS.BourgaultY.DompierreJ.RobichaudM. P.TamA.ValletM-G., Anisotropic mesh optimization towards a solver-independent and mesh-independent CFDIn Lecture series in computational fluid dynamics (1996): von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics.
8.
HabashiW. G.DompierreJ.BourgaultY.Ait-Ali-YahiaD.FortinM.ValletM-G., Anisotropic mesh adaptation: Towards user-independent, mesh-independent and solver-independent CFD solutions: Part I: General principlesInt. J. Numer. Methods Fluids326 (2000): 725–744.
9.
Ait-Ali-YahiaD.BaruzziG.HabashiW. G.FortinM.DompierreJ.ValletM-G., Anisotropic mesh adaptation: Towards user-independent, mesh-independent and solver-independent CFD solutions: Part II: Structured gridsInt. J. Numer. Methods Fluids39 (2002): 657–674.
10.
DompierreC. J.ValletM-G.BourgaultY.FortinM.HabashiW.G., Anisotropic mesh adaptation: Towards user-independent, mesh-independent and solver-independent CFD solutions: Part III: Unstructured meshesInt. J. Numer. Methods Fluids39 (2002): 675–702.
11.
HabashiW. G.FortinM.YahiaD. A. A.BoivinS.BourgaultY.DompierreJ.RobichaudM. P.TamA.ValletM.-G., Anisotropic mesh opti-mization towards a solver-independent and mesh-independent CFDIn Lecture series in computational fluid dynamics (1996): von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics.
MohammadiB.PironneauO., Mesh adaption and automatic differentiation in a CAD-free framework for optimal shape designInt. J. Num. Meth. Fluids30 (1999): 127–146.
18.
Castro-DiazM. J.BorouchakiH.GeorgeP. L.HechtF.MohammadiB., Anisotropic adaptive mesh generation in two dimensions for CFDComput. Fluid Dyn.96 (1996): 181–192.
19.
BorouchakiH.GeorgeP. L.MohammadiB., Delaunay mesh generation governed by metric specications: Part 2: Application examplesFinite Elem. Anal. Des25 (1997): 85–109.
20.
RemakiL.LepageC. Y.HabashiW. G., Efficient anisotropic mesh adaptation on weak and multiple shocks (2004): AIAA paper 2004-0084.
21.
RemakiL.HabashiW. G., 3-D mesh adaptation on multiple weak discontinuities and boundary layersSIAM J. Sci. Comput.284 (2006): 1379–1397.
22.
NakahashiK.SharovD.KanoS.KoderaM., Applications of unstructured hybrid grid method to high-Reynolds number viscous flowsInt. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids31 (1999): 97–111.
23.
LarsonM. G.BarthT. J., A posteriori error estimation for discontinuous galerkin approximations of hyperbolic systems (1999): NAS Technical Report NAS-99-010.
24.
PierceN. A.GilesM. B., Adjoint recovery of superconvergent functionals from PDE approximationsSIAM Rev.422 (2000): 247.
25.
BogstadM. C.KhoC.MokhtarianF.RemakiL.LepageC. Y.HabashiW. G., Geometrical- and solution-based mesh adaptation on a NASA semi-span flap (2003): CASI.
26.
StormsB. L.TakahashiT.RossJ. C., Aerodynamic influence of a finite-span flap on a simple wing (1998): SAE paper 951977.
27.
StormsB. L.RossJ. C.HorneW. C.HayesJ. A.DoughertyR. P.UnderbrinkJ. R.ScharpfD. F.MoriartyP. J., An aeroacoustic study of an unswept wing with a three-dimensional high-lift system (1998): NASA/TM-112222.
28.
DavisS. S., NACA 64A010 (NASA Ames model) oscillatory pitching (1982): In Compendium of Unsteady Aerodynamic Measurements, AGARD Report 702, August.
29.
D'azevedoE. F.SimpsonR. B., On optimal triangular meshes for minimizing the gradient errorNüm. Math.594 (1991): 321–348.
30.
FortinM., Anisotropic mesh adaptation through hierarchical error estimators —SIAM J. Numer. Anal.264 (1998): 788–811.
