In this paper a review of various methodologies for burr prediction and minimization in face milling is presented. In particular, the authors look into the geometric solutions employed, which typically consist of understanding and modifying tool engagement conditions. The extent of applicability of various approaches is discussed and the possible direction for future research is indicated.
DornfeldD. A.Intelligent deburring of precision components. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conferenceon Industrial electronics, control, instrumentation and automation, San Diego, USA, 1992, pp. 953–960.
5.
NarayanaswamiR.DornfeldD. A.Design and process planning strategies for burr minimization and deburring. Trans. N. Am. Mfg Res. Inst., SME, 1994, 22, 313–322.
6.
SteinJ. M.DornfeldD. A.An architecture for integrated design and manufacturing of precision mechanical components. Trans. N. Am. Mfg Res. Inst., SME, 1997, XXV, 249–254.
7.
ChuC. H.Integrated edge precision machining. PhD Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, California, 2000.
8.
ParkI.Modeling of burr formation process in metal cutting. PhD Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 1996.
9.
ChernG. L.Analysis of burr formation and breakout in metal cutting. PhD Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 1993.
10.
HashimuraM.DornfeldD. A.Analysis of burr formation mechanism in machining process. In 1st International Machining and Grinding Conference, SME, Dearborn, Michigan, 1995.
11.
HashimuraM.HassamontrJ.DornfeldD. A.Effect of in-plane exit angle and rake angles on burr height and thickness in face milling operation. Trans. ASME, J. Mfg Sci. Engng, 1999, 121, 13–19.
12.
BansalA. K.Burr prediction system for face milling operation. Masters Report, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 2002.
13.
RangarajanA.Optimization of face milling process - tool path and process planning techniques. PhD Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 2005.
14.
HassamontrJ.DornfeldD. A.Review of burr minimization approaches. In Proceedings of the 2nd World Manufacturing Conference, University of Durham, September 1998, pp. 446–452.
15.
SokolowskiA.NarayanaswamiR.DornfeldD. A.Prediction of burr size using neural networks and fuzzy logic. In Proceedings of the Japan-USA Symposium on Flexible automation, ISCIE, Kobe, Japan, 1994, pp. 889–896.
16.
KumarS.Basic model for burr prediction system. Master's Report, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 2001.
17.
NarayanaswamiR.DornfeldD. A.Burr minimization in face milling: A geometric approach. Trans, ASME, J. Mfg Sci. Engng, 1997, 119, 170–177.
18.
HassamontrJ.BlondazL.DornfeldD. A.Avoiding exit burr in CNC end milling by an adapted tool path. In ASME IMECE, Anaheim, California, November 1998, pp. 497–501.
19.
RangarajanA.Priority based tool path planning for face milling. Masters Report, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 2001.
20.
RamachandranP.Tool path planning for face milling. Master's Report, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 2003.
21.
RangarajanA.ChuC. H.DornfeldD. A.Avoiding tool exit in planar milling by adjusting width of cut. Proc. ASME, Mfg Engng Div., 2000, MED-Vol. 11, 1017–1025.
