Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study compares the responses of health professionals to multiple sclerosis (MS) and motor neurone disease (MND) in order to determine similarities and variations in responses to the two disorders and the issues critical to caring for patients with these conditions. Health professionals were more negative about MND compared with MS in terms of the amount they felt able to offer patients, their confidence in managing patients and their ability to convey hope. For a number of issues concerning the management of patients, the level of difficulty experienced by health professionals was similar for both MS and MND. These were resource issues, the health professionals' ability to remain positive in the face of progressive disability, interdisciplinary team problems and difficulties regarding patient care. The main concern of health professionals, for both conditions, was the effect of progressive disability on the patient. For MND, management issues which health professionals found comparatively more difficult than for MS were patients' short prognosis and impending death, communication problems and progressive disability. Issues which were comparatively more difficult for MS than MND were changes in patients' affect, cognition and personality, problems with planning care because of the disorder's unpredictable course, problems with diagnosis such as making and disclosing the diagnosis, and the tendency for patients to be difficult or demanding. Some notable differences in responses between health professionals in different health care settings were found. The findings have implications for changing health professionals' conceptualization of ‘hope’, developing ways of improving communication between health professionals in different health care settings so as to enable them to learn from each other's expertise and experiences and redressing gaps in service provision, especially for young people with MS.

Keywords

hope (non-MeSH)delivery of health care,integrated palliative care patient care planning multiple sclerosis motor neurone disease

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Silverstein MD , Stocking CB et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and life-sustaining therapy: patients' desires for information, participation in decisionmaking and life-sustaining therapy. Mayo Clin Proc 1991; 66: 906–913.

Hainsworth MA , Burke ML , Lindegren CL et al. Chronic sorrow in multiple sclerosis. Home Healthcare Nurse 1993; 11: 9–13.

Allen CM . Conscious but paralysed: releasing the locked in. Lancet 1993; 342: 867–868.

O'Brien MT . Multiple sclerosis: stressors and coping strategies in spousal caregivers. J Comm Health Nurs 1993; 10: 123–135.

Des Rosier MB , Cantanzano M , Pillar J . Living with chronic illness: social support and well spouse perspective. Rehab Nurse 1992; 17: 87–91.

McDonald ER , Carpenter CL . Survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol 1994; 51: 17–23.

Hainsworth MA . Living with multiple sclerosis: the experience of chronic sorrow. J Neurosci Nurs 1994; 26: 237–240.

Scheinberg LC . Multiple sclerosis: therapeutic strategies. Ann Neurol 1994;36: s122.

Kim T . Hope as a mode of coping in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurosci Nurs 1989; 6: 342–347.

10.

O'Brien MT . Palliative care and taboos with motor neurone disease. Palliat Med 1993; 7: 69–72.

11.

Langton-Hewer R , Newrick P . Motor neurone disease: can we do better? A study of 42 patients. Br Med J 1984; 289: 539–542.

12.

Meininger V . Breaking the bad news in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Palliat Med 1993; 7(suppl to issue 4): 37–40.

13.

Norris F . Motor neurone disease. Br Med J 1992; 304: 459–460.

14.

Cardy P . Research and the associations: an era for partnership. Palliat Med 1993; 7: 3–9.

15.

Hirschmann T , Zimmermann CW . Multiple sclerosis-disclosing the diagnosis: attitude of patients: when? how? disclosure at all? Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 1987; 55: 263–272.

16.

O'Connor P , Detsky AS , Tansey C et al. Effect of diagnostic testing for multiple sclerosis on patient health perceptions. Arch Neurol 1991; 51: 46–51.

17.

Johnston M , Earll L , Mitchell E , Morrison V , Wright S . Communicating the diagnosis of motor neurone disease. Palliat Med 1996; 10: 23–34.

18.

Counte MA , Bieliauskas LA , Pavlou M . Stress and personal attitudes in chronic illness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 272–275.

19.

Evers KJ , Karnilowicz W . Patient attitude as a function of disease state in multiple sclerosis. Soc Sci Med 1996; 43: 1245–1251.

20.

Woodruff R . Palliative medicine–symptomatic and supportive care for patients with advanced cancer and AIDS, 2nd edn. Melbourne: Asperula, 1996.

21.

Noy S , Achiron U , Barak Y et al. A new approach to affective symptoms in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Compr Psychiatry 1995; 36: 390–395.

22.

Devins GM , Seland TP . Emotional impact of multiple sclerosis: recent findings and suggestions for future research. Psychol Bull 1987; 101: 363–375.

23.

Miller J . Hope inspiring strategies of the critically ill. Appl Nurs Res 1989; 2: 23–29.

24.

Cohen RS , Mount BM , Strobel MG , Bul F . The McGill quality of life questionnaire: a measure of quality appropriate for people with advanced disease. A preliminary study of validity and acceptability. Palliat Med 1995; 9: 207–219.

25.

Scanlon C . Creating a vision of hope: the challenge of palliative care. Onc Nurs Forum 1989; 16: 491–496.

26.

Cutcliffe J . How do nurses inspire and instil hope in terminally ill HIV patients? J Adv Nurs 1995; 22: 888–895.

Health professionals' responses to multiple sclerosis and motor neurone disease

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References