This study is retrospective, comparing and contrasting the effects of expansion of the maxillary arch, and its long-term stability, with the use of either a rapid maxillary expansion appliance, quadhelix, or removable appliance. Transverse alteration in the intercanine and intermolar widths were studied, as were the alteration in the inclination of the canine and molar teeth during this period.
British Standards Institution (1983) British Standard Glossary of Dental Term, BS 4492, 13 2, Park Street, London W1A 2BS
2.
ChaconasS. J., De AlbaY., and LevyJ. A. (1977) Orthopaedic and Orthodontic applications of the quadhelix appliance, American Journal of Orthodontics, 72, 422–428.
3.
DahlbergG. (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students.New York, Interscience.
4.
FerrisH. C. (1914) Discussion of Dr G. V. I. Brown's paper, Dental Cosmos, 56, 218.
5.
GoddardC. L. (1893) Separation of the superior maxillae at the symphysis, Dental Cosmos, 35, 880–882.
6.
GoddardC. L. (1894) Separation of the superior maxillae at the symphysis, Transcription of the World's Columbian Dental Congress, 2, 89.
7.
Linder-AronsonS. and LindgrenJ. (1979) The skeletal and dental effects of rapid maxillary expansion, British Journal of Orthodontics, 6, 25–29.
8.
StoreyE. (1973) Tissue response to the movement of bones, American Journal of Orthodontics, 64, 229–247.
9.
TakadaK., LoweA. A., and DeCouR. (1983) Operational performance of the reflex metrograph and its applicability to the three dimensional analysis of dental casts, American Journal of Orthodontics, 83, 195–199.
10.
TimmsD. J. and MossJ. P. (1971) An histological investigation into the effect of rapid maxillary expansion on the teeth and their supporting tissues. Transcriptions of the European Orthodontic Society, 263–271.
