This paper describes the clinical orthodontic treatment of 2 cases that were successfully entered for the 2004 American Orthodontics MOrth Cases Prize. The first case is that of a patient presenting with a Class III malocclusion treated with rapid maxillary expansion and protraction headgear followed by fixed appliance therapy. The second case demonstrates the use of fixed appliances to correct a moderate Class II division I malocclusion.
RichmondS, ShawWC, RobertsCT, AndrewsMThe PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod1992; 14: 180–7.
2.
BrookPH, ShawWCThe development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod1989; 11: 309–20.
NganP, HaggU, YiuC, MerwinD, WeiSHSoft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with maxillary expansion and protraction headgear treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1996; 109: 38–49.
5.
McNamaraJAJr, BaccettiT, FranchiL, HerbergerTA. Rapid maxillary expansion followed by fixed appliances: a long-term evaluation of changes in arch dimensions. Angle Orthod2003; 73: 344–53.
6.
RickettsRMPerspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. Angle Orthod1981; 51: 115–50.
7.
CoboJM, DiazB, de CarlosF.Maintaining anchorage with a combination Nance-Goshgarian transpalatal arch. J Clin Orthod1998; 32: 681.
