Prepared samples of light-activated composite were cured by transillumination of tooth tissue in healthy volunteers. Positioning of the samples and the direction of illumination was designed to simulate curing during direct bonding. The effectiveness of curing was investigated by determination of surface microhardness. The degree of polymerization of the specimens cured by transillumination was found to be reduced compared to the control samples cured by direct exposure to the light source.
FriedmanJ. and HassanR. (1984) Comparison study of visible curing lights and hardness of light-cured restorative materials, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 54, 504–506.
3.
LoviusB. B. J., PenderN., HewageS., O'DowlingI., and TomkinsA. (1987) A Clinical trial of a Light-Activated Bonding Material over an 18-month period, British Journal of Orthodontics, 14, 11–20.
4.
MoseleyH., StrangR., and StephenK. W. (1986) An assessment of visible light polymerising sources, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 13, 215–224.
5.
ReadM. J. F. (1984) The bonding of orthodontic attachments using a visible light curing adhesive, British Journal of Orthodontics, 2, 16–20.
6.
StrangR., CummingsA., and StephenK. W. (1986) Laboratory studies of visible-light cured fissure sealants: Setting times and depth of polymerisation, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 13, 305–310.
7.
StrangR., MacdonaldI., O'HaganS., MurrayJ., and StephenK. W. (1987) Units variations in performance of curing light by determination of resin composite setting time, British Dental Journal, 162, 63–65.
8.
TavasM. A. and WattsD. C. (1979) Bonding of Orthodontic Bracket by Transillumination of light activated composite; an in vitro study, British Journal of orthodontics, 6, 207–208.
9.
TavasM. A. and WattsD. C. (1984) A visible Light-activated Direct Bonding Material: An In Vitro Comparative Study, British Journal of Orthodontics, 11, 33–37.
10.
WattsD. C., AmerO., and CombeE. C. (1984) Characteristics of Visible-light-activated Composite Systems, British Dental Journal, 156, 209–215.
