This study reports on a detailed investigation into the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction process of multistory wooden buildings relative to the other life cycle stages: the material production and operation stages. The results showed that the construction stage accounts for 20–30% of the initial embodied emissions and 6–10% of the total emission of the included life cycle stages. Especially the transport process of building components seems to have higher potential to mitigate the emissions than the actual construction work. In addition, the emissions from different construction systems were studied based on the reference buildings. Although definitive conclusion would be difficult to be drawn from this study alone due to the small sample size and the assumptions made, prefabrication work seems to be a more efficient construction method compared to on-site work for wooden buildings.
FrischknechtR, JungbluthN, AlthausHJ, DokaG, DonesR, HischierR, HellwegS, HumbertS, MargniM, NemecekT, and SpielmannM. 2007. Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods: Data v2·0. ecoinvent report No. 3. http://www.ecoinvent.org/fileadmin/documents/en/03_LCIA-Implementation.pdf (accessed 10/10/12).
10.
GangolellsM, CasalsM, GassoT, and ForcadaN. 2009. A methodology for predicting the severity of environmental impacts related to the construction process of residential buildings.Build. Environ. 44(3): 558–571.
11.
HolmL, SchaufelbergerJE, GriffinD, and ColeT. 2005. Construction cost estimating: process and practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
12.
IEA (International Energy Agency). 2012. Energy statistic. http://www.iea.org/ (accessed 28/03/12).
13.
JunnilaA, HorvathA, and GuggemosA. 2006. Life-cycle assessment of office buildings in Europe and the United States.J. Infrastruct. Syst. 12(1): 10–17.
14.
JunnilaA, and HorvathA. 2003. Life-cycle environmental effects of an office building.J. Infrastruct. Syst. 9(4): 157–166.
15.
KeoleianGA, BlanchardS, and ReppeP. 2000. Life-cycle energy, costs, and strategies for improving a single-family house.J. Ind. Ecol. 4(2): 135–156.
16.
OrtizS, CastellsF, and SonnemannG. 2009. Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA.Constr. Build. Mater. 23(1): 28–39.
17.
PeurifoyR, and OberlenderG. 2002. Estimating construction costs. 5th edn. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
18.
Peña-MoraF, AhnC, Golparvar-FardM, HajibabaiL, ShiftehfarS, A S, and AzizZ. 2009. A framework for managing emissions from construction processes. Proc. Int. Conf. and Workshop on Sustainable Green Building Design and Construction. Cairo, Egypt, March 2009. NSF. p. 13.
19.
PopescuCM, PhaobunjongK, and OvararinN. 2005. Estimating building costs. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.
20.
QualeJ, EckelmanMJ, WilliamsKW, SloaditskieG, and ZimmermanJB. 2012. Comparing environmental impacts of building modular and conventional homes in the united states.J. Ind. Ecol. 16(2): 243–253.
21.
SartoriI, and HestnesAG. 2007. Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: a review article.Energy Build. 39: 249–257.
22.
ScheurerC, KeoleianGA, and ReppeP. 2003. Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modelling challenges and design implications.Energy Build. 35: 1049–1064.
23.
VerbeeckG, and HensH. 2007. Life cycle optimization of extremely low energy buildings. Proc. Clima 2007 WellBeing Indoors, Helsinki, Finland, June 2007. FINVAC. pp. 2138–2145.
24.
WatsonC, NewmanJ, UptonRHS, and HackmannP. 2005. Round Table on Sustainable Development, Can transnational sectoral agreements help reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). http://www.oecd.org/sd-roundtable/papersandpublications/39357524.pdf (accessed 09/11/13).
