A study was carried out to investigate the effect of thermal treatment on biological resistance of Populus tremuloides wood against four decay fungi, including T. versicolor, P. placenta, G. trabeum and C. puteana. The weight loss data showed that degradation of untreated wood by the white rot fungus T. versicolor resulted in higher weight loss (57·1%) compared to those by brown rot fungi G. trabeum (21·9%), P. placenta (36·7%) and C. puteana (7·1%). When this species was heat treated at 220°C, the weight loss was reduced to <10%. Increasing temperature and the holding time appeared to affect the resistance against T. versicolor, P. placenta and G. trabeum attacks, but the effect on the resistance against C. puteana was not significant. The humidity during thermal modification affected the degradation of wood against T. versicolor attack, but it did not have a significant effect on the other fungi.
DanielG. 2003. Microview of wood under degradation by bacteria and fung.In Goodell et al. 2003, 34–72.
8.
de GrootWF, PanWP, RahmanMD, RichardsGN. 1988. First chemical events in pyrolysis of wood.J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolys. 13: 221–231.
9.
EN 113. 1986. Wood preservatives. Determination of toxic values of wood preservatives against wood destroying basidiomycetes cultured on AN agar medium. Norme Française NF EN 113 produits de préservation des bois-Détermination du seuil d'efficacité contre les champignons basidiomycetes lignivores cultivés sur milieu gélosé.
GaroteG, Domo˘A˘nguezH, ParajoJC. 2001. Study on the deacetylation of hemicelluloses during the hydrothermal processing of Eucalyptus wood. Hol Roh Werkst59(1–2): 53–59.
12.
GonzalesM, BreeseMC, HaleMDC. 2005. Studies on the relaxation of heat treated wood. Proc. 2nd Conf. on ‘Wood modification’. , MilitzH, HillCAS (eds). Göttingen, Germany, October 2005. Pages 87–90.
13.
GreenFIII, HighleyTL. 1997. Mechanism of brown rot decay: paradigm or paradox.Int. Biodeter. Biodegrad. 39(2): 113–124.
14.
HakkouM, PetrissansM, GérardinP, ZoulalianA. 2006. Investigations of the reasons for fungal durability of heat-treated beech wood.Polym. Degrad. Stab. 91(2): 393–397.
15.
HighleyTL. 1999. Biodeterioration of wood. In US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Forest Products Laboratory 1999. 463.
16.
HillC. 2006. Wood modification-chemical, thermal and other processes. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Press.
17.
HomanW, TjeerdsmaB, BeckersE, JorissenA. 2000. Structural and other properties of modified wood. Proc. Conf. on ‘Timber engineering’. Whistler Resort, BC, Canada, July–August 2000. World Conference on Timber Engineering. Paper 8.
18.
KamdemDP, PizziA, GuyonnetR, JermannaudA. 1999. Durability of heat treated wood. Proc. 30th Annual Meeting of The International Research Group on Wood Preservation. Rosenheim, Germany, June 1999. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation. Doc. No IRG/WP/99-40145.
KocaefeD, PoncsákS, BolukY. 2008. Effect of thermal treatment on the chemical composition and mechanical properties of birch and aspen.Bioresources3(2): 517–537.
21.
LekounougouS, PétrissansM, JacquotJP, GelhayeE, GérardinP. 2009. Effect of heat treatment on extracellular enzymatic activities involved in beech wood degradation by Trametes versicolor.Wood. Sci. Technol. 43: 331–341.
22.
LevanSL, RossRL, WinandyJE. 1990. Effects of fire retardant chemicals on bending properties of wood at elevated temperatures. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, USA. Research paper FPL-RP-498.
23.
Metsä-KortelainenS, PaajanenL, ViitanenH. 2011. Durability of thermally modified Norway spruce and Scots pine in above-ground conditions.Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 6(4): 1–7.
24.
NazerianM, GhalehnoMD, KashkooliAB. 2010. Effect of wood species, amount of juvenile wood and heat treatment on mechanical and physical properties of laminated veneer lumber.J. Appl. Sci. 11: 980–987.
25.
PaesJB, MoraisVdeM., de LimaC.R. 2004. Natural resistance of nine woods of brasilian semi-arid region to wood-destroying fungi under laboratory conditions.Rev. Ávores28(2): 275–282.
26.
PoncsákS, KocaefeD, BouazaraM, PichetteA. 2006. Effect of high temperature treatment on the mechanical properties of birch (Betula papyrifera).Wood. Sci. Technol. 40: 647–663.
27.
SchwarzeFWR, BaumS, FinkS. 2000. Dual modes of degradation by Fistulina hepatica in xylem cell walls of Quercus robur.Mycol. Res. 104: 846–852.
28.
ten HaveR, TeunissenPJM. 2001. Oxidative mechanisms involved in lignin degradation by white-rot-fungi.Chem. Rev. 101: 3397–3413.
29.
TjeerdsmaBF, BoonstraM, PizziA, TekelyP, MilitzH. 1998. Characterisation of thermally modified wood: molecular reasons for wood performance improvement.Holz Roh Werkst56: 149–153.
30.
TjeerdsmaBF, MilitzH. 2005. Chemical changes in hydrothermal treated wood FTIR analysis of combined hydro thermal and dry heat-treated wood.Holz Roh Werkst63(2): 102–111.
31.
TjeerdsmaBF, StevensM, MilitzH. 2000. Durability aspects of (hydro) thermal treated wood. Proc. 31st Annual Meeting of The International Research Group on Wood Protection. Kona Surf, HI, USA, May 2000. The International Research Group on Wood Protection. Doc. No. IRG/WP00-40160.
32.
TjeerdsmaB, StevensM, MilitzH, van AckerJ. 2002. Effect of process conditions on moisture content and decay resistance of hydro-thermally treated wood.Holzfor. Holz. 5: 94–99.
33.
WeilandJJ, GuyonnetR. 2003. Study of chemical modifications and fungi degradation of thermally modified wood using DRIFT spectroscopy.Holz Roh Werkst61: 216–220.
34.
WelzbacherCR, RappAO. 2007. Durability of thermally modified timber from industrial-scale processes in different use classes: results from laboratory and field tests.Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2: 4–14.
35.
YildizS, GümüşkayaE. 2007. The effect of thermal modification on crystalline structure of cellulose in soft and hardwood.Build. Environ. 42(4): 62–67.
