The current state of the art of materials research using multi-objective genetic and evolutionary algorithms is briefly presented with critical analyses. The basic concepts of multi-objective optimisation and Pareto optimality are explained in simple terms and the advantages of an evolutionary approach are emphasised. Current materials related research in this area is summarised, focusing on the achievements to date and the specific needs for further improvement.
CoelloCAC, LamontGB and Van VeldhuisenDA: ‘Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems’, 2nd edn; 2007, New York, Springer.
3.
DebK: ‘Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms’; 2001, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.
4.
NishimotoK, SaidaK and ShinoharaY: ‘Computer aided alloy design of insert metal for transient liquid phase bonding of γ/γ′/β type high aluminium nickel base superalloy’, Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining, 2003, 8, 29–38.
5.
TancretF: ‘Computational thermodynamics, Gaussian processes and genetic algorithms: combined tools to design new alloys’, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2013, 21, 045013, DOI: 10.1088/0965-0393/21/4/045013.
6.
TancretF: ‘Computational thermodynamics and genetic algorithms to design affordable gamma′-strengthened nickel-iron based superalloys’, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2012, 20, 045012, DOI: 10.1088/0965-0393/20/4/045012.
7.
PetterssonF, ChakrabortiN and SaxénH: ‘A genetic algorithms based multi-objective neural net applied to noisy blast furnace data’, Appl. Soft Comput., 2007, 7, 387–397.
8.
GhoshA, SinghSB and ChakrabortiN: ‘Optimization of stability of retained austenite in TRIP aided steel using data-driven models and multi-objective genetic algorithms’, J. ASTM Int. (Mater. Perform. Charact.), 2012, 1.
9.
SunX, ZhaoG, ZhangC, Guan YY and GaoA: ‘Optimal design of second-step welding chamber for a condenser tube extrusion die based on the response surface method and the genetic algorithm’, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2013, 28, 823–834.
10.
ChakrabortiN: in ‘Pareto-optimality in design and manufacturing and how genetic algorithms handle it. Handbook of research on nature inspired computing for economy and management’; 2006, Hershey, PA, Idea Group Inc.
11.
ChakrabortiN: ‘Promise of multiobjective genetic algorithms in coating performance formulation’, Surf. Eng., 2014, 30, 79–82.
12.
GangulyS, KongCS, BroderickSR and RajanK: ‘Informatics-based uncertainty quantification in the design of inorganic scintillators’, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2013, 28, 726–732.
13.
KovačičM, RožejU and BrezočnikM: ‘Genetic algorithm rolling mill layout optimization’, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2013, 28, 783–787.
14.
SharmaTK, PantM and SinghM: ‘Nature-inspired metaheuristic techniques as powerful optimizers in the paper industry’,Mater. Manuf. Process., 2013, 28, 788–802.
15.
DattaS and ChattopadhyayPP: ‘Soft computing techniques in advancement of structural metals’, Int. Mater. Rev., 2013, 58, 475–504.
16.
PaszkowiczW: ‘Genetic algorithms, a nature-inspired tool: a survey of applications in materials science and related fields. Part II’. Mater. Manuf. Process., 2013, 28, 708–725.
17.
MitraK: ‘Genetic algorithms in polymeric material production, design, processing and other applications: a review’, Int. Mater. Rev., 2008, 53, 275–297.
18.
ChakrabortiN: ‘Genetic algorithms in materials design and processing’, Int.Mater.Rev., 2004, 49, 246–260.
19.
ChakrabortiN: ‘Chapter 5 – Evolutionary data-driven modeling’, in ‘Informatics for materials science and engineering’, 71–95; 2013, Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann.
20.
Coello-CoelloCA and RicardoLB: ‘Evolutionary multiobjective optimization in materials science and engineering’, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2009, 24, 119–129.
21.
JhaR, SenPK and ChakrabortiN: ‘Multi-objective genetic algorithms and genetic programming models for minimizing input carbon rates in a blast furnace compared with a conventional analytic approach’, Steel Res. Int., 2014, 85, 219–232.
22.
KumarA, ChakrabartiD and ChakrabortiN: ‘Data-driven Pareto optimization for microalloyed steels using genetic algorithms’, Steel Res. Int., 2012, 83, 169–174.
23.
SinhaA, SikdarS, ChattopadhyayPP and DattaS: ‘Optimization of mechanical property and shape recovery behavior of Ti–(similar to 49 at.) Ni alloy using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm’, Mater. Design, 2013, 46, 227–234.
24.
DattaS, ZhangQ, SultanaN and MahfoufM: ‘Optimal design of titanium alloys for prosthetic applications using a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm’, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2013, 28, 741–745.
25.
Yegorov-EgorovIN, DulikravichGS and ColaçoMJ: ‘Optimizing chemistry of bulk metallic glasses for improved thermal stability’, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2008, 16, 075010, DOI: 10.1088/0965-0393/16/7/075010.
26.
BansalA, BarmanA, GhoshS and ChakrabortiN: ‘Designing Cu–Zr glass using multiobjective genetic algorithm and evolutionary neural network metamodels–based classical molecular dynamics simulation’,Mater. Manuf. Process., 2013, 28, 733–740.
27.
NandiAK, DebK, GangulyS and DattaS: ‘ Investigating the role of metallic fillers in particulate reinforced flexible mould material composites using evolutionary algorithms’, Appl. Soft Comput., 2012, 12, 28–39.
28.
NandiAK, DebK and DattaS: ‘Genetic algorithm–based design and development of particle-reinforced silicone rubber for soft tooling process’, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2013, 28, 753–760.
29.
GujarathiA, MotagamwalaAH and BabuBV: ‘Multiobjective optimization of industrial naphtha cracker for production of ethylene and propylene’, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2013, 28, 803–810.
30.
MitraK: ‘Assessing optimal growth of desired species in epoxy polymerization under uncertainty’, Chem. Eng. J., 2010, 162, 322–330.
31.
ZhangQ, MahfoufM, PanoutsosG, BeamishK and NorrisI: ‘Knowledge discovery for friction stir welding via data driven approaches. Part 2 – multiobjective modelling using fuzzy rule based systems’, Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining, 2012, 17, 681–693.
32.
TutumCC, DebK and HattelJH: ‘Multi-criteria optimization in friction stir welding using a thermal model with prescribed material flow’, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2013, 28, 816–822.
33.
HariharanK, NguyenN.-T, ChakrabortiN, LeeM.-G and BarlatF: ‘Multi-objective genetic algorithm to optimize variable drawbead geometry for tailor welded blanks made of dissimilar steels’, Steel Res. Int., 2014, in press, DOI: 10.1002/srin.201300471.
34.
UlutanD. and ÖzelT.,‘Multiobjective optimization of experimental and simulated residual stresses in turning of nickel-alloy IN100’. Mater. Manuf. Process., 2013, 28, 835–841.
35.
LiY, ChenY.-Y, ChenC.-Y, ShenC.-H, ChengH.-W, LoI.-H and ChenC.-N: ‘Device simulation–based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for process optimization of semiconductor solar cells’, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2013, 28, 761–767.
36.
MitraK: ‘Evolutionary surrogate optimization of an industrial sintering process’, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2013, 28, 768–775.
37.
HariharanK, ChakrabortiN, LeeM.-G and BarlatF: ‘A novel multi-objective genetic algorithms based calculation of Hill's coefficients’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2014, 45, 2704–2707.
38.
BhattacharyaB, KumarGDR, AgarwalA, ErkoçS, SinghA and ChakrabortiN: ‘Analyzing Fe–Zn system using molecular dynamics, evolutionary neural nets and multi-objective genetic algorithms’, Comp. Mater. Sci., 2009, 46, 821–827.
39.
RajakP, TewaryU, DasS, BhattacharyaB and ChakrabortiN: ‘Phases in the Zn-coated Fe analyzed through an evolutionary meta-model and multi-objective genetic algorithms’, Comp. Mater. Sci., 2011, 50, 2502–2516.
40.
RajakP, GhoshS, BhattacharyaB and ChakrabortiN: ‘Pareto-optimal analysis of Zn-coated Fe in the presence of dislocations using genetic algorithms’, Comp. Mater. Sci., 2012, 62, 266–271.
41.
BagS, DeA and DebRoyT: ‘A genetic algorithm-assisted inverse convective heat transfer model for tailoring weld geometry’, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2009, 24, 384–397.
42.
GiriBK, HakanenJ, MiettinenK and ChakrabortiN: ‘Genetic Programming through Bi-objective genetic algorithms with study of a sSimulated moving bed process involving multiple objectives’, Appl. Soft Comput., 2013, 13, 2613–2623.
43.
GiriBK, PetterssonF, SaxénH and ChakrabortiN: ‘Genetic programming evolved through bi-objective genetic algorithms applied to a blast furnace’, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2013, 28, 776–782.
44.
KantAet al.: ‘Comparison of multi-objective evolutionary neural network, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and bootstrap-based neural network for flood forecasting’, Neural Comput. Appl., 2013, 23, S231–S246.
45.
HillR: ‘A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals’. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A: Math. Phys. Sci., 1948, 193, (1033), 281–297.
46.
NandanR, DebRoyT and BhadeshiaHKDH: ‘Recent advances in friction-stir welding – process, weldment structure and properties’, Prog. Mater. Sci., 2008, 53, 980–1023.
47.
KotasP and HattelJH: ‘Modelling and simulation of A segregates in steel castings using thermal criterion function. Part II – Optimisation of real industrial cast part’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2012, 28, 911–917.
48.
MondalDN, SarangiK, PetterssonF, SenPK, SaxénH and ChakrabortiN: ‘Cu-Zn separation by supported liquid membrane analyzed through multi-objective genetic algorithms’, Hydrometallurgy, 2011, 107, 112–123.
49.
PetterssonF and SaxénH: ‘Method for the selection of inputs and structure of feedforward neural networks’, Comput. Chem. Eng., 2006, 30, 1038–1045.
50.
FarinaM and AmatoP: ‘On the optimal solution definition for many-criteria optimization problems’, Proc. NAFIPS–FLINT Int. Conf. 2002, Piscataway, NJ, June 2002, IEEE Service Center, pp. 233–238.
51.
LotovAV, KamenevGK, BerezkinVE and MiettinenK: ‘Optimal control of cooling process in continuous casting of steel using a visualization-based multi-criteria approach’, Appl. Math. Model., 2005, 29, 653–672.
PalaniPK, MuruganN and KarthikeyanB: ‘Process parameter selection for optimising weld bead geometry in stainless steel cladding using Taguchi's approach’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2006, 22, 1193–1200.
55.
BigiG: ‘Uniqueness of KKT multipliers in multiobjective optimization’, Appl. Math. Lett., 2004, 17, 1285–1290.
56.
TutumCC and HattelJH: ‘Numerical optimisation of friction stir welding: review of future challenges’, Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining, 2011, 16, 318–324.
57.
AgarwalA, TewaryU, PetterssonF, DasS, SaxénH and ChakrabortiN: ‘Analysing blast furnace data using evolutionary neural network and multiobjective genetic algorithms’, Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2010, 37, 353–359.
58.
NandanR, RaiR, JayakanthR, MoitraS, ChakrabortiN and MukhopadhyayA: ‘Regulating crown and flatness during hot rolling: a multiobjective optimization study using genetic algorithms’, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2005, 20, 459–478.
