The nano/ultrafine grains with different orientations were obtained by reversion transformation for austenitic stainless steel, and their tensile properties were investigated at room temperature. Comparing with the transverse direction sample, the much slower transformation induced plasticity was responsible for excellent elongation of rolled direction sample and the much higher strength originated from the presence of a considerable number of nanotwin bundles and the finer dislocations inside twins. The lower strength and plasticity in transverse direction sample could be attributed to the forming of shear bands and lack of deformation nanotwins.
RezaeeA, KermanpurA, NajafizadehA, MoallemiM: ‘Production of nano/ultrafine grained AISI 201L stainless steel through advanced thermo-mechanical treatment’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, A528, 5025–5029.
2.
LeeSJ, ParkYM, LeeYK: ‘Reverse transformation mechanism of martensite to austenite in a metastable austenitic alloy’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, A515, 32–37.
3.
MisraRDK, Ravi KumaB, SomaniM, KarjalainenP: ‘Deformation processes during tensile straining of ultrafine/nanograined structures formed by reversion in metastable austenitic steels’, Scr. Mater., 2008, 59, 79–82.
4.
Ravi KumarB, RaabeD: ‘Tensile deformation characteristics of bulk ultrafine-grained austenitic stainless steel produced by thermal cycling’, Scr. Mater., 2012, 66, 634–637.
5.
LiuGZ, TaoNR, LuK: ‘316L austenite stainless steels strengthened by means of nano-scale twins’, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2010, 26, (4), 289–292.
6.
LuK, LuL, SureshS: ‘Strengthening materials by engineering coherent internal boundaries at the nanoscale’, Science, 2009, 324, 349–352.
7.
UejiR, TsuchidaN, TeradaD, TsujiN, TanakaY, TakemuraA, KunishigeK: ‘Tensile properties and twinning behavior of high manganese austenitic steel with fine-grained structure’, Scr. Mater., 2008, 59, 963–966.
8.
YangP, XieQ, MengL, DingH, TangZ: ‘Dependence of deformation twinning on grain orientation in a high manganese steel’, Scr. Mater., 2006, 55, 629–631.
9.
YooCS, ParkYM, JungYS, LeeYK: ‘Effect of grain size on transformation-induced plasticity in an ultrafine-grained metastable austenitic steel’, Scr. Mater., 2008, 59, 71–74.
10.
HuangCX, YangG, WangC, ZhangZF, WuSD: ‘Mechanical behaviors of ultrafine-grained 301 austenitic stainless steel produced by equal channel angular pressing’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A., 2011, 42A, 2061–2071.
11.
SpencerK, EmburyJD, ConlonKT, VéronM, BréchetY: ‘Strengthening via the formation of strain-induced martensite in stainless steels’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A., 2004, A387–A389, 873–881.
12.
IdrissiH, RenardK, SchryversD, JacquesPJ: ‘On the relationship between the twin internal structure and the work-hardening rate of TWIP steels’, Scr. Mater., 2010, 63, 961–964.
13.
ByunTS: ‘On the stress dependence of partial dislocation separation and deformation microstructure in austenitic stainless steels’, Acta Mater., 2003, 51, 3063–3071.
14.
YamakovV, WolfD, PhillpotSR, GleiteH: ‘Deformation twinning in nanocrystalline Al by molecular-dynamics simulation’, Acta Mater., 2002, 50, 5005–5020.
BouazizO, GueltonN: ‘Modelling of TWIP effect on work-hardening’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A., 2001, A319–A321, 246–249.
17.
MurrLE, MoinE, GreulichF: ‘The contribution of deformation twins to yield stress: The Hall-Petch law for inter-twin spacing’, Scr. Mater., 1978, 12, 1031–1035.
18.
YanFK, LiuGZ, TaoNR, LuK: ‘Strength and ductility of 316L austenitic stainless steel strengthened by nano-scale twin bundles’, Acta Mater., 2012, 60, 1059–1071.
19.
BhadeshiaHKDH, HoneycombeRWK: ‘Steels microstructure and properties’; 2006, Oxford, Elsevier.
20.
SabirovI, EstrinY, BarnettMR, TimokhinaI, HodgsonPD: ‘Tensile deformation of an ultrafine-grained aluminium alloy: Micro shear banding and grain boundary sliding’, Acta Mater., 2008, 56, 2223–2230.
